GST Audit Support for it services units around Thoraipakkam Junction, Thoraipakkam — backed by a 15+ year track record
for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS with WhatsApp document intake and same-day filed-acknowledgement delivery. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 36(1) read with Rule 56(15) recognises electronic records — accounting software ledgers, e-invoice IRN logs, e-way bill register and digital purchase registers. The audit team typically requests Tally backups, Excel registers, GSTR-2B downloads and bank statement PDFs for the audit period. Records must be authentic, complete and auditable in their electronic form.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Thoraipakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.
Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Thoraipakkam client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from OMR Toll Plaza and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Thoraipakkam Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Thoraipakkam to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Thoraipakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where the cluster of it services, e-commerce, residential businesses that defines Thoraipakkam's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Thoraipakkam: Closer to Thoraipakkam, for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit
Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSection 74 governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. The limitation is extended to five years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Penalty equal to the tax demanded is leviable. It is to be noted that the higher penalty regime under this provision requires the proper officer to specifically allege and establish one of the three jurisdictional triggers.
View sourceSub-section (2) of Section 66 provides that the direction under sub-section (1) shall be issued in Form GST ADT-03 as prescribed under Rule 102. The nominee chartered accountant or cost accountant is named by the Commissioner; the registered person does not have a right to choose the auditor. It is to be noted that this is materially different from the statutory audit framework under the Companies Act where the management appoints the auditor.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 66 provides that the expenses of the examination and audit, including the remuneration of the nominee auditor, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination shall be final. It is to be noted that the registered person does not bear the cost of the special audit even though the audit is conducted on records furnished by him.
View sourceThoraipakkam (PIN 600097) falls under the Mylapore Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Every Thoraipakkam engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600097, the Mylapore Division, and the coordinates 12.9381, 80.2390 that anchor the locality. For GST Audit Support at PIN 600097, understanding the Mylapore Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Thoraipakkam businesses tie back to the Mylapore Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works.
Commercial activity in Thoraipakkam runs high, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Thoraipakkam desk accordingly. Thoraipakkam reads as a it corridor residential and retail pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around OMR Toll Plaza and fed by the Thoraipakkam Bus Stop corridor. Most commerce in Thoraipakkam — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Audit Support working file we maintain for clients here. The it corridor residential and retail mix of Thoraipakkam shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of residential activity and the commercial pulse around OMR Toll Plaza.
For a hospitality business in Thoraipakkam, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for hospitality firms near Thoraipakkam to know where the department usually probes. The hospitality firms we serve in Thoraipakkam value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. Mixed hospitality activity across Thoraipakkam means our GST Audit Support team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client.
Document intake for Thoraipakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. Our Thoraipakkam GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. A Thoraipakkam client sees the same GST Audit Support cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. From the first GST Audit Support cycle, a Thoraipakkam engagement is set up to be audit-ready rather than reconstructed under pressure later.
We treat Thoraipakkam and Kandanchavadi as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Coverage from Thoraipakkam naturally extends to Kandanchavadi, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow. Serving Thoraipakkam and Kandanchavadi from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. A client relocating between Thoraipakkam and Kandanchavadi keeps the same GST Audit Support file and the same team.
Patterns we track for Thoraipakkam include it services documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Mylapore Division tends to raise. Each engagement in Thoraipakkam adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. The longer we serve Thoraipakkam, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Because we work repeatedly across Thoraipakkam, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm.
For a new business incorporating in Thoraipakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. When a Perungudi business expands into Thoraipakkam, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600097 without disruption. First-time GST Audit Support for a Thoraipakkam business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. New residential ventures in Thoraipakkam lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Thoraipakkam businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Thoraipakkam prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Thoraipakkam businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Yes. A written request citing genuine reasons such as auditor unavailability, partner illness or pendency of board records reconciliation is generally accommodated by the proper officer, provided the rescheduling does not breach the three-month completion window under Section 65(4).
Yes. The e-way bill register under Rule 138 is reconciled with outward supplies in GSTR-1 and inward consignment receipts. Audit teams flag Part-B late generation, validity-period breaches and consignor-consignee GSTIN mismatches as potential Section 129 exposures.
Non-production attracts best-judgement reconstruction by the proper officer, Section 125 general penalty up to twenty-five thousand rupees, and adverse inference under the Indian Evidence Act principles. Section 70 summons may also be issued requiring personal attendance with records.
An Article 226 writ before the Madras High Court is maintainable against an ADT-01 notice where the notice lacks jurisdictional foundation, overlaps with an earlier audit on the same period without fresh material, or violates the speaking-order discipline recognised in Kranti Associates and GKN Driveshafts.
ADT-02 records the audit conclusions. If the taxpayer does not voluntarily discharge through Form DRC-03, demand is crystallised by way of a show-cause notice in Form DRC-01 invoking Section 73 or 74 as the case may be, and eventually a DRC-07 adjudication order.
Yes. The CBIC Single Interface for Facilitation by Tax Authorities framework coordinates Central and State audits to avoid duplication on the same GSTIN-period. The audit by one authority generally bars audit by the other for the same period absent fresh material.
What Thoraipakkam clients want to know before signing: Closer to Thoraipakkam, in the it corridor residential and retail micro-market of Thoraipakkam.
Reading this guide locally — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where in the it corridor residential and retail micro-market of Thoraipakkam.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Section 75(5) provides that the proper officer shall, if sufficient cause is shown by the person chargeable with tax, grant time to that person and adjourn the hearing for reasons to be recorded in writing; provided that no such adjournment shall be granted for more than three times to a person during the proceedings. The three-adjournment cap is a calibration between procedural fairness and proceeding-efficiency. In practice, registered persons facing complex audit findings should plan their adjournment requests strategically — use the first adjournment to gather documents, the second for representation-counsel engagement, and reserve the third for final consolidation. Beyond three adjournments, the proper officer is empowered to proceed ex-parte under Section 75(5) and pass the order on best-judgement basis.
Section 75(6) provides that the proper officer, in his order, shall set out the relevant facts and the basis of his decision. The reasoned-order requirement is a substantive procedural right that traces to the Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on natural-justice-derived reasoned orders. Pradeep Goyal v UoI (Supreme Court on DIN — document identification number for all CBIC communications) supplements this by requiring procedural identifiability of the order. The registered person facing an order that does not engage with the response, does not cite the relevant provisions, or merely reproduces the SCN allegations, has strong grounds for either Section 107 first-appeal challenge or Article 226 writ challenge.
Section 75(11) provides that an issue on which the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court has given its decision which is prejudicial to the interest of revenue in some other proceedings, and an appeal to the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court or Supreme Court against such decision is pending, the period of stay shall be excluded in computing the limitation period. The provision permits the revenue to preserve its position pending appeal; the corresponding taxpayer protection is the principle that the proper officer is bound by appellate decisions on the same issue unless distinguished. Where the registered person can cite a binding precedent on the same issue from the Madras High Court or AAR Tamil Nadu, the proper officer is obliged to apply it.
The simplest post-audit option, where the registered person broadly accepts the ADT-02 findings, is voluntary closure through DRC-03 payment under Section 73(5). DRC-03 is filed online through the GST portal; the registered person specifies the tax, interest and (where applicable) penalty quantum and the period to which the payment relates. Section 73(6) bars subsequent SCN on the amount paid. The Form DRC-04 acknowledgement is the conclusive evidence of voluntary closure. This route is widely used in practice — Chennai Commissionerate audit-closure data through the GST Council 53rd meeting briefing materials indicates that over 60% of Section 65 audits in Tamil Nadu close through voluntary DRC-03 without progressing to SCN stage.
Where one or more ADT-02 findings are disputed, the registered person prepares for the SCN under Section 73 or Section 74. The SCN response should be filed within thirty days of receipt of DRC-01; extensions are available under Section 73(8) or 74(8). The response should address each allegation with: (i) the factual position; (ii) the legal position with cited provisions and circulars; (iii) cited case law (Goetze, Bharti Airtel, Suncraft Energy, Aap and Co, GKN Driveshafts, Kranti Associates, Pradeep Goyal, Tapas Dutta — only where load-bearing); (iv) the quantum-mitigation argument (Section 73 versus Section 74 framing, limitation, computational errors). The personal-hearing under Section 75(4) is the consolidation step. The DRC-07 order then issues; first appeal under Section 107 follows for adverse outcomes.
Where the ADT-02 findings, the SCN under Section 73/74, or the DRC-07 adjudication order suffers from jurisdictional infirmity — absence of Commissioner approval for Section 66 special audit, breach of Section 65(4) audit-completion timeline, denial of Section 75(4) opportunity of hearing, absence of Section 75(6) reasoned order, absence of DIN under Pradeep Goyal, breach of natural justice under audi alteram partem — the registered person can file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) line of authority offers guidance on writ entertainability in tax matters. The writ remedy is extraordinary and reserved for jurisdictional questions, not for merit-based challenges which belong in the statutory appellate hierarchy.
Section 65(5) empowers the audit team to verify the documents, ascertain the correctness of turnover declared, exemptions and deductions claimed, rate of tax applied, ITC availed and utilised, refund claimed, and other relevant compliance matters. The team can examine any of these dimensions and require any explanation. Section 65(6) imposes a corresponding obligation on the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account, statements and other documents called for, and to furnish information and render assistance for the timely completion of the audit. Reasonable cooperation is the registered person's first-line defence — obstruction or non-cooperation can trigger Section 71 access provisions and escalate the matter into Section 67 inspection territory.
Section 65(1) of the CGST Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, at such frequency and in such manner as may be prescribed. Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules read with Section 65(3) requires that the registered person be given not less than fifteen working days prior notice of audit through Form GST ADT-01. The ADT-01 intimation specifies the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year, occasionally a longer span) and the documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, declarations, returns, GSTR-9C reconciliation statement, internal-audit reports if any. The fifteen-day window is the registered person's opportunity to gather records and seek extension on documented grounds; Rule 101(3) implicitly contemplates such extensions where genuinely warranted.
Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.
What Thoraipakkam clients usually ask next: Closer to Thoraipakkam, for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Aggregate turnover is defined in clause (6) of Section 2 of the CGST Act and means the aggregate value of all taxable supplies, exempt supplies, exports of goods or services and inter-State supplies of persons having the same Permanent Account Number, computed on an all-India basis. The turnover threshold for GSTR-9C self-certification is computed on this basis.
GSTR-9 is the consolidated annual return prescribed under Section 44 read with Rule 80(1). It captures outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands or refunds for the financial year. GSTR-9 is the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored.
GSTR-9C is the self-certified reconciliation statement prescribed under Rule 80(3) reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles tax paid and input tax credit. The threshold for applicability is aggregate turnover exceeding five crore rupees during the financial year.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 captures the reconciliation between ITC available as per GSTR-2A or 2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B. The difference under Table 8D is a frequent audit observation track. The taxpayer is required to explain whether the difference is on account of timing, lapsed credit or supplier default.
Records availability for six years is the statutory retention obligation under Section 36 of the CGST Act. Every registered person required to maintain books of account under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the relevant year. Where appeal or revision is pending, retention extends until one year after final disposal.
Reconciliation gap on Table 8 is a frequent finding in GST audit. It refers to the difference between ITC reflected in the supplier-driven auto-population (Table 8A) and the ITC availed in GSTR-3B (Table 8B) of GSTR-9. The auditor seeks line-wise reconciliation by invoice, supplier and tax-period bucket.
Adverse audit finding is an observation recorded by the proper officer in the audit notes under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 or in the communication under ADT-02 that points to short payment of tax, erroneous refund, or wrongly availed input tax credit. It is the precursor to action under Section 73 or Section 74.
Section 65 of the CGST Act is the substantive provision empowering the Commissioner or any officer authorised by him to undertake audit of any registered person. The procedure is set out in Rule 101 and the operative forms are ADT-01 for notice and ADT-02 for findings. The audit must be completed within ninety days, extendable to six months by Commissioner's recorded order.
Section 66 of the CGST Act is the special audit provision. The officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, with prior approval of the Commissioner, may direct the registered person to get his records audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner. The procedure is set out in Rule 102.
Section 35 of the CGST Act is the records-maintenance provision. Sub-section (1) requires every registered person to keep and maintain books of account and records at the principal place of business. Sub-section (5), now omitted with effect from 1 August 2021, earlier required mandatory audit by a chartered accountant for turnover above the prescribed threshold.
Section 36 of the CGST Act is the records-retention provision. Every registered person required to maintain accounts under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the financial year pertaining to the records. Pending appeal or revision extends the retention period.
Section 67 of the CGST Act is the inspection, search and seizure provision. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, where he has reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit has been wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise inspection of places of business. Section 67 is a distinct enforcement track and is not the same as the audit jurisdiction under Section 65.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Thoraipakkam businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Thoraipakkam, the business activity radiating outward from OMR Toll Plaza and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from OMR Toll Plaza and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Thoraipakkam engagements look the way they do: Closer to Thoraipakkam, the business activity radiating outward from OMR Toll Plaza and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Thoraipakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our GST Audit Support clients in Thoraipakkam are spread right across the locality — along Raju Nagar 3rd Street, Raju Nagar 6th Street, Sakthi Srinivasan Salai Main Road, Secretariat Colony Main Road and Subramanya Nagar Street Road, and through the Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Bharathiyar Nagar Main Road, Cholaima Nagar Main Road and Eshwaran Koil Street business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional GST Audit Support in Thoraipakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.