Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Kandanchavadi · near Tidel Park (nearby) · GST Audit Support desk

GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi, Chennai

GST Audit Support cadence for Kandanchavadi firms near Kandanchavadi Bus Stop — with a documented, audit-ready process

Professional GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi (PIN 600096), Chennai by qualified experts with a 15+ year, zero-penalty record. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

What is Form ADT-02 and when is it issued in Kandanchavadi, Chennai?

ADT-02 is the audit findings report issued under Rule 101(5) at the conclusion of a Section 65 audit. It records the findings of the proper officer along with reasons, taxpayer's rights and obligations, and any short-paid tax, wrong ITC or interest detected. ADT-02 is not a demand notice but a finding — demand follows separately via DRC-01 if findings are not accepted and discharged.

Transparent Pricing

GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic ADT-01 documentation
₹5,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Summary level
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Starter
On-site audit support 1 day
₹15,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (1 day)
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (1 session)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Full audit representation + ADT-02 reply
₹35,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 5 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 5 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item with documentary backup
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Premium
Section 66 special audit + Section 107 appeal
₹85,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 6 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Section 66 Special Audit Coordination with Nominated CA
  • DRC-01 SCN Reply (Section 73/74)
  • Section 107 First Appeal Filing with 10% Pre-deposit
  • Personal Hearing Representation
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 6 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Litigation-grade with case-law backing
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Dedicated Audit Manager
  • Priority 24-Hour Support

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Kandanchavadi Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

ADT-02 Findings Replied With Case-Law

Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.

DRC-03 Voluntary Closure

Where findings are accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 with reference to the audit ARN gets ADT-04 closure issued — no DRC-01 SCN under Section 73 or 74, no penalty escalation.

Section 66 Special Audit Coordination

Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).

6-Year Records Retention Maintained

All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.

Section 107 First Appeal Filed

Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.

15+ Years Chennai Audit Experience

Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.

Key Benefits

What Kandanchavadi Clients Get

Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Without Surprises
For Kandanchavadi businesses above ₹5 crore turnover, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 prepared and self-certified well before 31 December — no Table 8 mismatch, no HSN summary gap.
Confidential Audit Defence
Audit working papers, ADT-02 findings and reconciliation evidence stored under access-controlled channels. Kandanchavadi clients' audit data is never shared with third parties or used for cross-marketing.
Audit Closed Without Demand
Where findings are minor and accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 closes the audit at ADT-04 stage. Kandanchavadi clients avoid DRC-01 SCN, Section 73/74 adjudication and penalty escalation.
ITC Defended Against Supplier Default
ITC questioned solely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer is defended with Section 16 compliance evidence and Madras HC precedent — credits retained without reversal.
Table 8 Mismatch Demand Avoided
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — historically the most-litigated audit finding — prepared with line-item backup so audit team has no basis to propose ITC reversal under Rule 36(4) or Section 16(2)(aa).
RCM Demand Pre-Empted
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA and director payments — paid in cash, ITC reclaimed in same period, fully documented. Kandanchavadi clients face no surprise RCM demand at audit stage.
Comparison

Section 65 (Departmental) vs Section 66 (Special)

Why this matters here — Across Kandanchavadi, the business activity radiating outward from Tidel Park (nearby) and nearby commercial pockets. Practitioners note that with quick access via Kandanchavadi Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Kandanchavadi to the rest of Chennai.

AspectSection 65 (Departmental)Section 66 (Special)
Time limit to completeThree months from commencement, extendable by six months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded in writingNinety days for submission of report by the nominated professional, extendable by another ninety days on application
Stage at which the engagement beginsAny time during the record-retention window under Section 36, generally any complete financial yearAt any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act per Section 66(1)
Concluding instrumentForm ADT-02 records findings; demand if any follows separately through DRC-01 under Section 73 or Section 74Form ADT-04 records the nominated auditor's report; subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or Section 74 as appropriate
Bar on a second audit of the same periodDepartmental audit does not preclude action under other provisions; fresh material is generally needed to revisitSpecial audit may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted on the same period
Who bears the audit costCost is borne by the department; no professional fee burden falls on the registered personExpenses including remuneration of the nominated professional are determined and paid by the Commissioner under Section 66(5)
Permissible defence themesReconciliation completeness, supplier-side bona fide credit per Suncraft Energy, jurisdictional discipline on procedural lapsesChallenge to recorded satisfaction of mis-declaration, opportunity of hearing under Section 66(3), Kranti Associates speaking-order standard
Onward escalation pathwayADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into DRC-01 then DRC-07; first appeal lies under Section 107 with ten per cent pre-depositADT-04 report feeds into Section 73 or 74 proceedings; final order is appealable under Section 107 on the same pre-deposit basis
Operative provisionSub-section (1) of Section 65 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 101 of the CGST RulesSub-section (1) of Section 66 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 102 of the CGST Rules
Authority who orders the auditCommissioner or any officer empowered by general or specific authorisation drives the audit through internal departmental staffOfficer ranked Assistant Commissioner or above, on the Commissioner's prior approval, directs an externally nominated professional
Person who conducts the examinationDepartmental proper officer either visits the registered place or summons books to the officeAn external professional, drawn from the CA or CMA pool and nominated by the Commissioner, examines records for the department
Triggering preconditionSelection on risk parameters; no satisfaction of mis-declaration is required to commenceOpinion that value declared is not correct or credit availed is not within normal limits, recorded with reasons
Initiating form and notice windowForm ADT-01 served at least fifteen working days before commencement per Rule 101(2)Form ADT-03 issued as a direction; no fifteen-day buffer is prescribed since the audit is by a nominated professional
Documents Required

Documents for GST Audit Support

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Kandanchavadi clients.

12 months of GSTR-1 GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns for the audit period
Audited financial statements with Schedule III balance sheet and P&L
ITC ledger with Section 17(5) blocked-credit reversals and Table 8 GSTR-9 working
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 (for AATO above ₹5 crore)
E-way bill register for consignments above ₹50000 with vehicle and route details
RCM register — advocate fees GTA security director payments cash-paid and ITC-claimed
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Kandanchavadi, the cluster of it services, e-commerce, hospitality businesses that defines Kandanchavadi's commercial fabric.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Receipt of audit intimation in Form GST ADT-01 from the proper officer15 daysRecords preparation and place-of-business readinessAudit commences at the place of business or office of proper officer with or without taxpayer-side preparation; observations under Rule 101(4) may proceed on incomplete records
Date of commencement of audit under Explanation to Section 65(4)90 daysAudit completion by proper officerAudit must be completed within ninety days; extension up to six months by Commissioner-recorded order is the only safety valve
Conclusion of audit by the proper officer30 daysGST ADT-02 (findings communication)Proper officer must communicate findings, rights and obligations and reasons within thirty days; non-compliance vitiates the closure step
Service of ADT-01 by the proper officer15 daysRecords production at registered placeAudit commences on the date specified after the fifteen working day minimum notice; non-availability of records can trigger Section 122 proceedings for failure to maintain.
Direction for special audit by Commissioner90 daysADT-03 and audit reportNominated chartered accountant or cost accountant to submit the special audit report within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause shown by the auditor or the registered person.
Request for cross-examination of audit team during adjudicationOn due dateWritten application during personal hearingRight of cross-examination forms part of the opportunity of being heard; denial is a ground of appeal under Section 107
Communication of discrepancy in audit notes by the proper officer30 daysReply to discrepancy memoFailure to reply within the time allowed leads to recording of finding adverse to the registered person in ADT-02
ADT-02 findings indicate short-paid tax or wrongly availed credit1095 daysSection 73 SCN window from due date of annual returnShow-cause notice under Section 73 may be issued at least three months prior to the time-limit for issuance of order; order may be passed within three years from the due date of annual return

Deadline pressure points we see in Kandanchavadi: Closer to Kandanchavadi, for Kandanchavadi IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

GST ADT-02Audit report under Section 65

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit

Within thirty days of conclusion of audit Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GST ADT-03Direction for special audit

Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner

Issued during scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or other proceedings at any stage Officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner with Commissioner approval
GST ADT-04Communication of findings of special audit

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66; carries the nominee auditor's observations and the officer's view

After receipt of special audit report from nominee auditor Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GSTR-9Annual return

Consolidated annual return capturing outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands/refunds; the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored

On or before 31 December of the year following the financial year Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-9CReconciliation statement

Self-certified reconciliation between the value of supplies declared in the annual return and the audited annual financial statement, along with reconciliation of tax paid and ITC

Filed along with GSTR-9 by 31 December of the year following the financial year, where turnover exceeds five crore rupees Common Portal (self-certified by registered person)
DRC-01AIntimation of tax ascertained as payable

Pre-show-cause-notice intimation by the proper officer of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; carries Part A with officer's quantification and Part B for registered person's reply

Issued before formal SCN under Section 73 or 74; reply within the time allowed Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued, taxpayer responds Part B)
DRC-03Voluntary payment intimation

Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings

At any time before issuance of SCN or within the period allowed under the SCN Common Portal (taxpayer)
DRC-01Show cause notice under Section 73 or 74

Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds

Issued at least three months before the time-limit for adjudication order under Section 73(10); six months under Section 74(10) Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)

GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi, Chennai 600096

Kandanchavadi (PIN 600096) falls under the Mylapore Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Records we prepare for Kandanchavadi carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 12.9690, 80.2440, which map each submission back to this locality. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Kandanchavadi businesses tie back to the Mylapore Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. The 600xx geo-zone covering Kandanchavadi groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.

Most commerce in Kandanchavadi — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Audit Support working file we maintain for clients here. Freight and foot traffic from the Kandanchavadi Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Kandanchavadi, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this it corridor omr start pocket. The it corridor omr start mix of Kandanchavadi shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of hospitality activity and the commercial pulse around Tidel Park (nearby). Commercial activity in Kandanchavadi runs high, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Kandanchavadi desk accordingly.

We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for e-commerce firms near Kandanchavadi to know where the department usually probes. For a e-commerce business in Kandanchavadi, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. The e-commerce firms we serve in Kandanchavadi value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. Sector concentration matters: when Kandanchavadi leans toward e-commerce, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle.

Fixed-fee scoping means a Kandanchavadi business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement. Our Kandanchavadi GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. Turnaround for Kandanchavadi GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. The qualified-review step on every Kandanchavadi GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal.

Proximity to Perungudi means a Kandanchavadi engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. We treat Kandanchavadi and Perungudi as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Coverage from Kandanchavadi naturally extends to Perungudi, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow. A client relocating between Kandanchavadi and Perungudi keeps the same GST Audit Support file and the same team.

Common patterns in the Mylapore Division give Kandanchavadi businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Kandanchavadi are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. The longer we serve Kandanchavadi, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Recurring gaps in Kandanchavadi hospitality records are the first thing our GST Audit Support review closes out.

A startup setting up near RMZ Millennia in Kandanchavadi gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Mylapore Division from day one. Shifting principal place of business to Kandanchavadi means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. For a new business incorporating in Kandanchavadi or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. When a Thoraipakkam business expands into Kandanchavadi, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600096 without disruption.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi — Complete Guide

For Kandanchavadi businesses crossing the ₹5 crore aggregate turnover threshold, GSTR-9C self-certification under Section 44 read with Rule 80 is filed alongside GSTR-9. Where the Commissioner directs a Section 66 special audit through ADT-03, FilingPro coordinates with the nominated Chartered Accountant, gives full record access and ensures the 90-day report timeline is managed without prejudice to the taxpayer's position.

GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi, Chennai

Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Kandanchavadi businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.

GST Audit Consultant in Kandanchavadi — Section 65 and Section 66 Expert

A dedicated GST audit consultant in Kandanchavadi prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

ADT-01 Notice Reply and ADT-02 Findings Defence in Kandanchavadi

On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Expert in Kandanchavadi — Above ₹5 Crore Turnover

For Kandanchavadi businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹5,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi
Section 65 departmental audit handled end-to-end for Kandanchavadi clients — ADT-01 to ADT-04 closure with zero adverse demand.
15 working days notice window under Rule 101(2) used for full records compilation — no last-minute scramble at audit start.
GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation prepared in advance — variances explained before the audit team raises queries.
Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC reconciliation tied line-item to GSTR-2B and audited books — no Table 8 mismatch demand.
Section 17(5) blocked-credit workings — motor vehicles personal use, food and beverages, club membership, works contract — pre-disclosed in audit file.
RCM register reconstructed for advocate, GTA, security and director payments — Section 9(3) compliance demonstrated to audit team.
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 for Kandanchavadi businesses above ₹5 crore AATO — Notification 10/2023 compliance evidenced.
ADT-02 findings replied with Tvl. Diya Agencies and Tvl. Raja Stores case-law where supplier-default ITC reversal is proposed.
DRC-03 voluntary closure filed where findings accepted — ADT-04 closure obtained without DRC-01 SCN escalation under Section 73/74.
Section 66 special audit coordination with Commissioner-nominated CA — 90-day report timeline managed with full record access.
People Also Ask — GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi
What is the difference between Section 65 and Section 66 GST audit?
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the place of business, with ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance and 3-month completion (extendable to 6 months). Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with Commissioner's approval) and conducted by an external Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, with 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days). Section 66 audit cost is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5).
How long must GST records be kept for audit?
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the registered person is party to any appeal, revision or proceeding, retention extends to one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later. Cancellation of registration does not extinguish this obligation.
What happens if I do not respond to ADT-01 audit notice?
Non-response leads to ex-parte audit on the basis of available returns and information. Findings communicated via ADT-02 will be unfavourable since the taxpayer's books and reconciliations are absent. The proper officer can then issue DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74 followed by adjudication order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating tax demand with interest and penalty.
Can I voluntarily pay tax based on audit findings?
Yes. Where ADT-02 findings are accepted, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and applicable penalty) can be voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. The proper officer then issues ADT-04 closure order. Voluntary payment under DRC-03 also helps avoid the DRC-01 SCN route under Section 73 or 74.
Is GSTR-9C audit by a CA still mandatory?
No. From FY 2020-21 onwards (Finance Act 2021 amendments) GSTR-9C is self-certified by the registered person, not certified by an external CA. The reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is prepared and filed by the taxpayer alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December, where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in the financial year.
Can the same period be audited twice under GST?
Generally no. Once Section 65 audit is completed and ADT-04 closure order is issued, the same period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Section 66 special audit is a separate power and may be ordered if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
What happens if records are not produced during ADT-01 audit?

Non-production attracts best-judgement reconstruction by the proper officer, Section 125 general penalty up to twenty-five thousand rupees, and adverse inference under the Indian Evidence Act principles. Section 70 summons may also be issued requiring personal attendance with records.

Can a writ petition be filed against an ADT-01 notice itself?

An Article 226 writ before the Madras High Court is maintainable against an ADT-01 notice where the notice lacks jurisdictional foundation, overlaps with an earlier audit on the same period without fresh material, or violates the speaking-order discipline recognised in Kranti Associates and GKN Driveshafts.

How does an ADT-02 finding mature into a tax demand?

ADT-02 records the audit conclusions. If the taxpayer does not voluntarily discharge through Form DRC-03, demand is crystallised by way of a show-cause notice in Form DRC-01 invoking Section 73 or 74 as the case may be, and eventually a DRC-07 adjudication order.

Are Tamil Nadu CGST and SGST audits coordinated?

Yes. The CBIC Single Interface for Facilitation by Tax Authorities framework coordinates Central and State audits to avoid duplication on the same GSTIN-period. The audit by one authority generally bars audit by the other for the same period absent fresh material.

Is professional representation permitted during a GST audit?

Yes. Section 116 permits an authorised representative including a Chartered Accountant, Cost Accountant or advocate to represent the registered person. Representation is widely used in {{area_name}} for ADT-01 audits and Section 66 special-audit coordination to ensure procedural rigour.

What is the difference between Section 65 audit and Section 66 special audit?

Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the proper officer at the registered person's place. Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner directing a Commissioner-nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to conduct the examination on specified grounds.

What Kandanchavadi clients want to know before signing: Closer to Kandanchavadi, on the Perungudi-Sholinganallur corridor that passes through Kandanchavadi.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Gst Audit Support

Reading this guide locally — Across Kandanchavadi, in the it corridor omr start micro-market of Kandanchavadi.

What is a GST audit and where does it sit in the compliance architecture

Self-certification under GSTR-9C and its audit interplay

Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.

Comparative framework — VAT/CST audits versus GST audit

Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.

Statutory framework under Chapter XIII of the CGST Act

The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.

Common audit findings

Reverse-charge under Sections 9(3) and 9(4) — self-invoice gaps

The second-most-common audit finding is missed reverse-charge — supplies where the recipient is liable to pay tax under Section 9(3) (notified categories — GTA without forward-charge election, legal services, sponsorship, services by directors, etc.) or Section 9(4) (supplies from unregistered to registered persons in notified categories for real-estate developers under Notification 07/2019-CT(R) read with 03/2019-CT(R)). Section 31(3)(f) requires the recipient to issue a self-invoice; many registered persons miss this step. The audit-team computes the missed output liability under reverse-charge, the corresponding ITC eligibility (subject to time-limit under Section 16(4)), and the interest under Section 50. Voluntary disclosure via DRC-03 is the standard close-out.

Classification and rate-of-tax disputes

The third-recurrent audit finding is classification and rate-of-tax. The GST rate structure across the rate notifications (Notification 01/2017-CT(R) and amendments, Notification 11/2017-CT(R) for services) contains thousands of HSN-and-SAC line items with rates from nil to 28%; classification borderlines are inherent. Audit-team challenges typically focus on: dual-rate items (5%/12%/18% pharmaceutical formulations, footwear, restaurants), composite versus mixed supplies under Section 8 (where the principal-supply classification determines the rate), and works-contract versus pure services classification. The Section 97 Advance Ruling mechanism offers a forward-looking certainty path; for historical classifications, the response is to cite the CBIC circulars (e.g. Circular 164/20/2021-GST on services classification clarifications) and contemporaneous trade-practice evidence.

Place-of-supply errors and IGST versus CGST/SGST

Place-of-supply errors are the fourth common finding — typically where the registered person charged CGST/SGST (intra-State) when the place of supply under Sections 10 to 13 IGST Act was inter-State (requiring IGST), or vice versa. Section 77 of the CGST Act provides a corrective mechanism — where tax was paid under one head but is actually payable under another, the wrongly-paid tax can be claimed as refund and the correctly-payable tax should be paid; the registered person is not penalised, only interest under Section 50 may apply. Audit teams sometimes overlook Section 77 and compute full short-payment additions; citing Section 77 with documented evidence of the corresponding refund-eligible head closes the issue at audit stage.

Pre-audit preparation

Document marshalling on receipt of ADT-01

Upon receipt of Form ADT-01, the registered person's first task in the fifteen-day window is structured document marshalling. The recommended sequence is: (i) compile the full year's GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A / 2B downloads; (ii) compile GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C with the underlying reconciliation working papers; (iii) compile sales register, purchase register and stock register from the accounting system; (iv) compile bank statements and cash-book extracts; (v) compile e-way bill summaries; (vi) compile reverse-charge self-invoice register under Section 31(3)(f); (vii) compile Rule 42 / 43 ITC apportionment working papers; (viii) compile statutory audit and tax audit reports for the corresponding financial year. This structured marshalling enables the audit team to verify systematically and shortens the audit cycle materially.

Internal reconciliation walkthrough

Before the audit-team's arrival, the registered person should conduct an internal reconciliation walkthrough — replicating the audit-team's likely interrogation map. The walkthrough should cover: GSTR-1 outward supply versus books turnover; GSTR-3B Table 3.1 versus GSTR-1 invoice-summary; GSTR-3B Table 4(A) ITC claimed versus GSTR-2A / 2B vendor uploads; GSTR-9 Tables 4 to 8 versus GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B aggregates; GSTR-9C Tables 5, 7, 9, 12 to 14 versus audited financial statements. Any variance identified at the walkthrough is an opportunity for voluntary DRC-03 payment before the audit-team formalises it; voluntary disclosure during the walkthrough phase typically attracts no penalty under Section 73(5) read with Section 73(6).

Engagement of representation counsel

For audits of even moderate complexity, engagement of a representation counsel — a Chartered Accountant with GST practice depth, or a tax advocate for procedural-rights-heavy cases — is the standard professional practice. The counsel's role is to mediate communication with the audit team, draft formal responses to audit observations, attend personal hearings, and prepare voluntary-disclosure computations where applicable. The Section 116 representation framework under the CGST Act permits authorised representatives — relatives, employees, advocates, Chartered Accountants, Cost Accountants, and Company Secretaries — to appear before the proper officer. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents counsel-engagement as a standard taxpayer-rights practice across mature tax jurisdictions.

Representation rights under Section 75

Bound-by-appellate-decisions principle under Section 75(11)

Section 75(11) provides that an issue on which the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court has given its decision which is prejudicial to the interest of revenue in some other proceedings, and an appeal to the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court or Supreme Court against such decision is pending, the period of stay shall be excluded in computing the limitation period. The provision permits the revenue to preserve its position pending appeal; the corresponding taxpayer protection is the principle that the proper officer is bound by appellate decisions on the same issue unless distinguished. Where the registered person can cite a binding precedent on the same issue from the Madras High Court or AAR Tamil Nadu, the proper officer is obliged to apply it.

Opportunity of being heard under Section 75(4)

Section 75(4) of the CGST Act provides that an opportunity of being heard shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person. The opportunity is a substantive procedural right derived from the principles of natural justice and the constitutional audi alteram partem principle. The GKN Driveshafts (India) v ITO Supreme Court principle on the pre-decisional opportunity is applied in the GST context with full force. The proper officer's failure to grant the opportunity, or grant in a perfunctory manner, vitiates the order and provides grounds for writ relief under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court.

Multiple adjournments and Section 75(5)

Section 75(5) provides that the proper officer shall, if sufficient cause is shown by the person chargeable with tax, grant time to that person and adjourn the hearing for reasons to be recorded in writing; provided that no such adjournment shall be granted for more than three times to a person during the proceedings. The three-adjournment cap is a calibration between procedural fairness and proceeding-efficiency. In practice, registered persons facing complex audit findings should plan their adjournment requests strategically — use the first adjournment to gather documents, the second for representation-counsel engagement, and reserve the third for final consolidation. Beyond three adjournments, the proper officer is empowered to proceed ex-parte under Section 75(5) and pass the order on best-judgement basis.

What Kandanchavadi clients usually ask next: Closer to Kandanchavadi, for Kandanchavadi IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

Section 35

Section 35 of the CGST Act is the records-maintenance provision. Sub-section (1) requires every registered person to keep and maintain books of account and records at the principal place of business. Sub-section (5), now omitted with effect from 1 August 2021, earlier required mandatory audit by a chartered accountant for turnover above the prescribed threshold.

Section 36

Section 36 of the CGST Act is the records-retention provision. Every registered person required to maintain accounts under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the financial year pertaining to the records. Pending appeal or revision extends the retention period.

Section 67

Section 67 of the CGST Act is the inspection, search and seizure provision. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, where he has reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit has been wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise inspection of places of business. Section 67 is a distinct enforcement track and is not the same as the audit jurisdiction under Section 65.

Section 73

Section 73 of the CGST Act governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed for reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Order under sub-section (10) may be passed within three years from the due date of annual return; SCN at least three months prior.

Section 74

Section 74 of the CGST Act governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. The limitation extends to five years from the due date of the annual return. Penalty equal to the tax demanded is leviable.

Rule 101

Rule 101 of the CGST Rules prescribes the procedure for audit under Section 65. Sub-rule (1) provides that the audit period shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) deals with discrepancy notes and sub-rule (5) prescribes Form ADT-02 for communication of findings.

Rule 102

Rule 102 of the CGST Rules prescribes the procedure for special audit under Section 66. Sub-rule (1) prescribes Form ADT-03 for the direction to the registered person, and sub-rule (2) prescribes Form ADT-04 for communication of the findings of the special audit to the registered person.

Place of audit

Place of audit is governed by sub-section (2) of Section 65 which permits the audit to be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. The choice rests with the department; the registered person does not have a unilateral right to require off-site audit.

Date of commencement of audit

Date of commencement of audit is defined in the Explanation to sub-section (4) of Section 65. It is the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. The ninety-day completion clock runs from this date.

Conclusion of audit

Conclusion of audit is the point at which the field-verification and records-examination work under Section 65 is finished. The thirty-day clock for issuance of ADT-02 under sub-section (6) of Section 65 starts running from conclusion. Conclusion is distinct from the date of communication of findings.

Period of audit

Period of audit under sub-rule (1) of Rule 101 shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. A multi-year audit is permissible where the audit notice in ADT-01 specifies the periods covered. The earliest period audited typically corresponds to records retention horizon under Section 36.

Audit notes

Audit notes are the contemporaneous record maintained by the proper officer during the conduct of audit under Rule 101. Discrepancies recorded in the audit notes are communicated to the registered person under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 with an opportunity to reply before the findings are crystallised in ADT-02.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
Records under Section 36 not retained for six years; ADT-01 audit unable to access two financial years of source data₹4,80,000 (best-judgement reconstruction)₹1,29,600 (18% over 18 months)₹25,000 (Section 125 general penalty)₹6,34,600
GSTR-9C self-certification not filed for FY 2021-22 by registered person above ₹5 crore aggregate turnoverNil (reconciliation only)Nil₹50,000 (₹25,000 CGST + ₹25,000 SGST under Section 47(2) capped)₹50,000
RCM on advocate fees of ₹14,00,000 under Section 9(3) not discharged across three financial years; audit-detected₹2,52,000₹68,040 (18% over 18 months)₹25,200 (10% of tax under Section 73(9) post-ADT-02)₹3,45,240
Section 17(5) blocked credit on motor vehicles ₹6,00,000 availed for two years; identified at Section 65 audit₹1,08,000₹29,160 (18% over 18 months)₹10,800 (10% of tax under Section 73(9))₹1,47,960
Table 8 GSTR-9 mismatch ₹22,00,000 between GSTR-2A and ITC availed; audit-flagged supplier-default segment₹3,96,000₹1,06,920 (18% over 18 months)₹39,600 (10% under Section 73(9) post-Suncraft defence)₹5,42,520
Section 16(4) outer-date breach on ITC of ₹12,00,000 availed in October following the financial year₹12,00,000 (reversal)₹2,16,000 (18% over 12 months)₹1,20,000 (10% under Section 73(9))₹15,36,000

How Kandanchavadi businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Kandanchavadi, the business activity radiating outward from Tidel Park (nearby) and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Kandanchavadi IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Kandanchavadi

How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Kandanchavadi, the business activity radiating outward from Tidel Park (nearby) and nearby commercial pockets.

IT Services
Common issue: Software exporters undergoing Section 65 departmental audits face Table 8 ITC reconciliation queries on GSTR-2A versus books, particularly where SEZ developer invoices and reverse-charge import-of-services entries cross financial-year boundaries. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat exports as zero-rated under the destination principle, but the proper officer expects FIRC-realised consideration to tie back to invoice-month GSTR-1 disclosure within an audit-defensible bridge.
How we handle it: Prepare a Section 65 audit working file containing the GSTR-1 to FIRC bridge, RFD-11 LUT copy, SOFTEX statement realisation register, and Rule 89(4) refund computation. Map every GSTR-2A entry to vendor PAN and invoice number; preserve reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f) for the seven-year horizon in Section 36 read with Rule 56.
IT Services
Common issue: IT firms with multiple co-working seats across States often face Section 65 audits flagging cross-charge under Schedule I distinct-person provisions. Where head-office overheads are not allocated to branch GSTINs via cross-charge invoices, the audit team computes notional value under Rule 28 and proposes additions running into ITC reversal at the recipient end.
How we handle it: Set up a documented cross-charge policy aligned with Circular 199/11/2023-GST which clarified distinct-person valuation. Issue monthly tax invoices from HO to branches at open market value or 110% of cost as the Rule 28 second proviso permits; preserve the cost-build-up sheet and salary-cost allocation key as audit working papers.
Hospitality
Common issue: Hotel and restaurant chains face Section 65 audit issues on the dual-rate restaurant scheme (5% without ITC versus 18% with ITC for specified non-standalone restaurants per Notification 11/2017-CT(R) as amended). Mid-year scheme-switching, or restaurants within hotels charging room tariff above ₹7,500 per day, frequently leads to ITC eligibility disputes.
How we handle it: Maintain a daily room-tariff register evidencing the ₹7,500 threshold determination month-wise; lock in the restaurant scheme at financial-year start and avoid intra-year switching. For aggregator (Zomato/Swiggy) supplies under Section 9(5), reconcile aggregator-collected output GST against own GSTR-1 disclosure to avoid double-counting allegations.
Residential
Common issue: Individual professionals (residential-area practitioners — architects, consultants, freelance professionals) under Section 65 audit face common-use ITC apportionment issues where residence-cum-office premises generate mixed personal and business utility bills, rent and broadband. Rule 42 apportionment is rarely documented contemporaneously, and audit teams treat full ITC claimed as ineligible.
How we handle it: Adopt a defensible area-based or usage-time-based apportionment for residence-cum-office ITC; document the policy in a contemporaneous note. For the audit period, voluntarily reverse the unsupported ITC fraction via DRC-03 with interest under Section 50; for forward periods, segregate office-only invoices (business broadband, dedicated DG-set) to maximise eligible ITC.
Education
Common issue: Edtech aggregators under audit face Section 9(5) e-commerce-operator scrutiny where multiple tutors supply through the platform. Notification 17/2017-CT(R) and subsequent amendments deem the platform liable for specified services; classification gaps between educational and commercial coaching at the platform level surface as suppressed-output exposures.
How we handle it: Demarcate platform revenue between exempt educational services (where applicable under Notification 12/2017-CT(R)) and taxable commercial coaching. For Section 9(5) coverage, confirm whether the specific service falls within the deemed-supplier framework via Circular 167/23/2021-GST and subsequent FAQs; build a CBIC-circular-anchored audit-defence file.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

Section 107 first appealRestaurants

Section 107 first appeal filed against an adverse ADT-02 demand for a {{area_name}} restaurant chain

Issue: A restaurant chain in {{area_name}} received an adverse Section 73 order of approximately nineteen lakh rupees following an ADT-02 finding on alleged misclassification of bundled food and beverage supplies under the five per cent restaurant scheme without ITC versus the eighteen per cent residual rate.
Approach: We filed Section 107 appeal with ten per cent pre-deposit confined to the disputed tax leg as governed by the Madras High Court ratio in Tvl Sri Murugan Trading. The grounds anchored on Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 13/2018, the AAAR ruling in Coffee Day Global on restaurant supplies, and the menu-card composition evidence.
Outcome: Appeal admitted within eighteen days; demand stayed pending hearing; pre-deposit confined to approximately one lakh ninety thousand rupees against a notional gross pre-deposit obligation of nearly three lakh forty thousand rupees.
Table 8 reconciliation cureIT Services

Table 8D adverse finding of ₹47 lakh cured before ADT-02 by re-running the 2B match

Issue: A Tidel Park IT-services company with ₹56 crore turnover was audited under Section 65 for FY 2021-22. The audit officer flagged a Table 8D negative of ₹47 lakh in the filed GSTR-9 and proposed in a draft observation note to demand reversal under Section 74 read with Rule 86A. The earlier consultant had filed Table 8 using auto-populated 8A without rebuilding from the underlying 2B and the difference looked like ineligible credit.
Approach: We requested a fifteen-day window to file a written reply before ADT-02 was issued — this pre-ADT-02 window under Section 65(6) read with the audit manual is where the cure has to happen, because once ADT-02 lands the matter moves to Section 73/74 proceedings. We rebuilt 8A from 2B for all twelve months, isolated ₹31 lakh of supplier invoices that the 2B export-limit truncation had dropped, identified ₹14 lakh of legitimate next-FY availment that belonged in 8C, and parked the residual ₹2 lakh in 8E with a working note.
Outcome: ADT-02 was issued without the Table 8 observation; only the ₹2 lakh residual was demanded under Section 73 (normal period, no penalty); the cure saved the client roughly ₹19 lakh in proposed interest and ₹47 lakh in proposed reversal; office rule was tightened — every GSTR-9 client now gets a 2B-rebuild working file before the partner signs the engagement.
Section 17(5) cureBPO

Section 17(5) blocked credit on staff bus services — adverse observation cured with the 2023 amendment

Issue: A Sholinganallur BPO with ₹38 crore turnover and 800 employees faced an ADT-02 draft observation proposing reversal of ₹28 lakh of ITC on staff transportation under Section 17(5)(b)(i) for FY 2022-23. The earlier consultant had availed the credit relying on the proviso for 'obligated under any law'. The audit officer was reading the proviso narrowly to mean Factories Act obligation only.
Approach: We filed a written submission under Section 65(6) referencing the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act Section 14 read with the women-safety guidelines issued by the Tamil Nadu Labour Department which mandate transport for women employees on shifts ending after 8 pm. We attached the company's HR policy, the shift roster showing 60% of bus users were women on late shifts, and the Asahi India Glass v UoI principle that ITC eligibility cannot be denied where the underlying expense is obligated by law. We also flagged the prospective amendment by Finance Act 2023 widening the proviso.
Outcome: Audit officer accepted the submission in part — ₹22 lakh out of ₹28 lakh was allowed on the women-employee-transport basis; ₹6 lakh on male-employee transport was conceded and paid through DRC-03; ADT-02 issued with a much narrower observation; no Section 74 invocation; client commissioned a Section 17(5) policy review across all twelve categories of blocked credit.
Section 65(4) timelineHospitality

Three-year audit period closed in 47 days against the Section 65(4) ceiling of 90 working days

Issue: A Chennai hotel group with two GSTINs and ₹26 crore turnover received ADT-01 covering three FYs — 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22. The audit was scheduled to commence on 1st February. Section 65(4) caps the audit at 3 months extendable to 6 months by the Commissioner, and from our experience an audit drifting past 90 working days starts attracting deeper questioning as the officer feels pressure to justify findings. We targeted closure in under 60 working days.
Approach: We prepared an audit-management calendar — week 1 records walkthrough, week 2-3 outward and inward supply reconciliation, week 4 ITC reconciliation, week 5 RCM and blocked credit, week 6 working note on observations, week 7 ADT-02 drafting input. We delivered every requested document within 24 hours, maintained a single email chain with the audit officer, and proposed weekly Friday closure meetings. We also flagged our own adverse-finding expectations upfront so the officer was not surprised.
Outcome: ADT-02 was issued on day 47; total observations of ₹4.2 lakh across both GSTINs (mostly room-tariff classification under Notification 14/2022 for the year of the rate change); all accepted and paid through DRC-03; no Section 74 invocation; the office now uses this engagement as a template for audit-calendar planning across all departmental-audit clients.

Why these Kandanchavadi engagements look the way they do: Closer to Kandanchavadi, the business activity radiating outward from Tidel Park (nearby) and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Kandanchavadi IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.

Client Reviews

What Kandanchavadi Clients Say

Ramanathan K
GST Audit Support
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Sundararajan M
GST Audit Support
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha S
GST Audit Support
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Venkatraman P
GST Audit Support
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
1 month agoVerified Client
Prabhakaran T
GST Audit Support
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Lakshmi V
GST Audit Support
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
4 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

GST Audit Support FAQ — Kandanchavadi

Common questions from Kandanchavadi clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

ADT-02 is the audit findings report issued under Rule 101(5) at the conclusion of a Section 65 audit. It records the findings of the proper officer along with reasons, taxpayer's rights and obligations, and any short-paid tax, wrong ITC or interest detected. ADT-02 is not a demand notice but a finding — demand follows separately via DRC-01 if findings are not accepted and discharged.
If the registered person does not accept the findings or pay the short-paid tax with interest through DRC-03, the proper officer issues a show-cause notice in DRC-01 under Section 73 (no fraud) or Section 74 (fraud/wilful misstatement). The taxpayer then has 30 days to file DRC-06 reply. Failing satisfactory reply, an adjudication order is passed under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating demand.
Absolutely. Most Kandanchavadi clients complete the entire GST Audit Support process remotely — we collect documents on WhatsApp or email, share drafts for your approval, and file on your behalf. A visit to our Maduravoyal office is optional, never required.
There are three categories. First, departmental audit under Section 65 conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the registered person's place of business. Second, special audit under Section 66 ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with prior approval) and conducted by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner. Third, self-certified reconciliation through GSTR-9C which a registered person above ₹5 crore aggregate turnover files alongside GSTR-9 from FY 2020-21 onwards.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit notice. Rule 101(2) requires it to be served at least 15 working days before the audit commences. The notice specifies the period under audit, place of audit, documents required and the authorised officer's name. The taxpayer should respond by collating the requested records before the start date.
If you are facing a deadline or a notice, call 9566-068-468 right away. We prioritise time-sensitive GST Audit Support cases for Kandanchavadi clients and tell you immediately what can realistically be done in the time available.
Yes. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 does not extinguish the record-retention obligation under Section 36. Records covering periods up to the effective date of cancellation must be retained for 6 years from the due date of the relevant annual return. The department can audit cancelled registrations within this 6-year window.
Section 36(1) read with Rule 56(15) recognises electronic records — accounting software ledgers, e-invoice IRN logs, e-way bill register and digital purchase registers. The audit team typically requests Tally backups, Excel registers, GSTR-2B downloads and bank statement PDFs for the audit period. Records must be authentic, complete and auditable in their electronic form.
Yes, we regularly take over part-completed GST Audit Support work. Share what has been done so far on WhatsApp 9566-068-468 and we will review it, point out anything that needs correcting, and continue from where you are.
Section 66 allows an Assistant Commissioner (not below this rank) with prior approval of the Commissioner to direct a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant — nominated by the Commissioner — to audit a registered person where the officer is of the opinion that the value declared is not correct or the credit availed is not within the normal limits. The order is issued in ADT-03 and the auditor's report is submitted within 90 days, extendable by another 90 days.
Section 65 audit is conducted at the principal place of business as registered in REG-06. If the audit covers transactions of branches (additional places of business), the records of those branches must be produced at the principal place or made accessible to the audit team. Kandanchavadi businesses with branches outside Tamil Nadu must coordinate branch records to the audit venue.
Yes. We do not disappear after filing — Kandanchavadi clients can come back to us for follow-up questions, notices or renewals tied to their GST Audit Support. Ongoing support is part of how we work, not a paid extra for routine queries.
Where the taxpayer accepts the findings in ADT-02, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and any applicable penalty) is voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. Reference to the audit ARN is recorded in DRC-03. The proper officer then passes the closure order in ADT-04 noting that the matter has been settled.
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires every registered person to retain books of account and other records for 6 years from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the taxpayer is party to an appeal, revision or any proceeding, records must be retained for one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles ITC as per GSTR-2A/2B with ITC availed in GSTR-3B. Differences arising from supplier non-filing, blocked credits under Section 17(5), or ineligible credits show up here. Audit teams scrutinise Table 8 to question wrongly availed ITC under Section 73 (no fraud) or Section 74 (fraud/wilful misstatement) where the difference is unexplained.
Yes. GST audit is GSTIN-wise — each registration has its own books, returns and assessment. A Tamil Nadu GSTIN of a multi-state business is audited separately from its Karnataka or Telangana GSTIN by the respective state's CGST or SGST authority. Records must therefore be maintained GSTIN-wise even where the underlying ERP is consolidated.
GST Audit Support near Kandanchavadi:

Across Kandanchavadi we look after firms on Dr MGR Main Road, 1st Main Road, 3rd Cross, Anna Nedunchalai and Anna Salai as well as the Church Main street, Nagamani Adigalar Street, Panchayat Main Road and School Road corridors — local GST Audit Support without the cross-city travel.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi?

Professional GST Audit Support in Kandanchavadi, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp