Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Trusted GST Audit Support Consultants · Ennore (PIN 600057)

Ennore GST Audit Support — Chennai North

End-to-end GST Audit Support for Ennore port and power industrial belt establishments — on fixed, transparent fees

GST Audit Support for Ennore firms under Chennai North (Manali Division) — transparent scope, no surprises, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

What is ADT-03 and how is it different from ADT-01 in Ennore, Chennai?

ADT-03 is the order under Section 66(1) directing a special audit by a nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. ADT-01 in contrast is the Section 65 departmental audit notice issued before the proper officer commences audit. ADT-03 is therefore an order — not a notice — and the audit is conducted by an external professional, not departmental officers.

Transparent Pricing

GST Audit Support in Ennore — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic ADT-01 documentation
₹5,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Summary level
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Starter
On-site audit support 1 day
₹15,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (1 day)
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (1 session)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Full audit representation + ADT-02 reply
₹35,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 5 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 5 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item with documentary backup
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Premium
Section 66 special audit + Section 107 appeal
₹85,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 6 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Section 66 Special Audit Coordination with Nominated CA
  • DRC-01 SCN Reply (Section 73/74)
  • Section 107 First Appeal Filing with 10% Pre-deposit
  • Personal Hearing Representation
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 6 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Litigation-grade with case-law backing
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Dedicated Audit Manager
  • Priority 24-Hour Support

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Ennore Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert GST Audit Support in Ennore — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

Section 107 First Appeal Filed

Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.

15+ Years Chennai Audit Experience

Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.

ADT-01 Notice Handled End-to-End

Every ADT-01 notice received by a Ennore client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.

On-Site Audit Representation

For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.

Table 8 GSTR-9 Reconciliation

Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.

Section 17(5) Workings Pre-Disclosed

Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.

Key Benefits

What Ennore Clients Get

Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

Table 8 Mismatch Demand Avoided
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — historically the most-litigated audit finding — prepared with line-item backup so audit team has no basis to propose ITC reversal under Rule 36(4) or Section 16(2)(aa).
RCM Demand Pre-Empted
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA and director payments — paid in cash, ITC reclaimed in same period, fully documented. Ennore clients face no surprise RCM demand at audit stage.
E-Way Bill Compliance Demonstrated
For consignments above ₹50000, e-way bill register with vehicle number and route details produced — Rule 138 compliance evidenced; no penalty under Section 122(1)(xiv) for non-issuance.
Section 17(5) Reversals Pre-Booked
Blocked credits — motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property — identified and reversed in monthly GSTR-3B itself. No audit reversal demand.
Special Audit Cost Borne by Department
Where Section 66 special audit is ordered, the cost of the nominated CA is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5) — not by the taxpayer. Ennore clients pay only FilingPro's coordination and representation fee.
Litigation-Ready Documentary File
Audit working papers, reconciliation sheets, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register and case-law citations retained for 7 years — supporting both the immediate audit and any future Section 107 or Tribunal appeal.
Comparison

Section 65 (Departmental) vs Section 66 (Special)

Why this matters here — Across Ennore, the cluster of port services, power generation, heavy engineering businesses that defines Ennore's commercial fabric. Practitioners note that served by short connections to Manali and Tiruvottiyur and onward to central Chennai.

AspectSection 65 (Departmental)Section 66 (Special)
Onward escalation pathwayADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into DRC-01 then DRC-07; first appeal lies under Section 107 with ten per cent pre-depositADT-04 report feeds into Section 73 or 74 proceedings; final order is appealable under Section 107 on the same pre-deposit basis
Operative provisionSub-section (1) of Section 65 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 101 of the CGST RulesSub-section (1) of Section 66 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 102 of the CGST Rules
Authority who orders the auditCommissioner or any officer empowered by general or specific authorisation drives the audit through internal departmental staffOfficer ranked Assistant Commissioner or above, on the Commissioner's prior approval, directs an externally nominated professional
Person who conducts the examinationDepartmental proper officer either visits the registered place or summons books to the officeAn external professional, drawn from the CA or CMA pool and nominated by the Commissioner, examines records for the department
Triggering preconditionSelection on risk parameters; no satisfaction of mis-declaration is required to commenceOpinion that value declared is not correct or credit availed is not within normal limits, recorded with reasons
Initiating form and notice windowForm ADT-01 served at least fifteen working days before commencement per Rule 101(2)Form ADT-03 issued as a direction; no fifteen-day buffer is prescribed since the audit is by a nominated professional
Time limit to completeThree months from commencement, extendable by six months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded in writingNinety days for submission of report by the nominated professional, extendable by another ninety days on application
Stage at which the engagement beginsAny time during the record-retention window under Section 36, generally any complete financial yearAt any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act per Section 66(1)
Concluding instrumentForm ADT-02 records findings; demand if any follows separately through DRC-01 under Section 73 or Section 74Form ADT-04 records the nominated auditor's report; subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or Section 74 as appropriate
Bar on a second audit of the same periodDepartmental audit does not preclude action under other provisions; fresh material is generally needed to revisitSpecial audit may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted on the same period
Who bears the audit costCost is borne by the department; no professional fee burden falls on the registered personExpenses including remuneration of the nominated professional are determined and paid by the Commissioner under Section 66(5)
Permissible defence themesReconciliation completeness, supplier-side bona fide credit per Suncraft Energy, jurisdictional discipline on procedural lapsesChallenge to recorded satisfaction of mis-declaration, opportunity of hearing under Section 66(3), Kranti Associates speaking-order standard
Documents Required

Documents for GST Audit Support

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Ennore clients.

12 months of GSTR-1 GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns for the audit period
Audited financial statements with Schedule III balance sheet and P&L
ITC ledger with Section 17(5) blocked-credit reversals and Table 8 GSTR-9 working
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 (for AATO above ₹5 crore)
E-way bill register for consignments above ₹50000 with vehicle and route details
RCM register — advocate fees GTA security director payments cash-paid and ITC-claimed
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Ennore, the business activity radiating outward from Kamarajar Port and nearby commercial pockets.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Receipt of audit intimation in Form GST ADT-01 from the proper officer15 daysRecords preparation and place-of-business readinessAudit commences at the place of business or office of proper officer with or without taxpayer-side preparation; observations under Rule 101(4) may proceed on incomplete records
Date of commencement of audit under Explanation to Section 65(4)90 daysAudit completion by proper officerAudit must be completed within ninety days; extension up to six months by Commissioner-recorded order is the only safety valve
Conclusion of audit by the proper officer30 daysGST ADT-02 (findings communication)Proper officer must communicate findings, rights and obligations and reasons within thirty days; non-compliance vitiates the closure step
Service of ADT-01 by the proper officer15 daysRecords production at registered placeAudit commences on the date specified after the fifteen working day minimum notice; non-availability of records can trigger Section 122 proceedings for failure to maintain.
Direction for special audit by Commissioner90 daysADT-03 and audit reportNominated chartered accountant or cost accountant to submit the special audit report within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause shown by the auditor or the registered person.
Completion of audit by the proper officer30 daysADT-02Findings, rights and obligations to be communicated to the registered person within thirty days of audit completion, failing which the registered person may treat the audit as closed without findings.
Communication of discrepancy in audit notes by the proper officer30 daysReply to discrepancy memoFailure to reply within the time allowed leads to recording of finding adverse to the registered person in ADT-02
Adjudication order under Section 73 or 74 served90 daysAPL-01 first appealRight of appeal lapses if first appeal under Section 107 is not filed within three months from communication of order

Deadline pressure points we see in Ennore: On the ground in Ennore, for Ennore units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

Forms most asked about here — Across Ennore, where port services businesses dominate the local compliance profile.

GST ADT-02Audit report under Section 65

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit

Within thirty days of conclusion of audit Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GST ADT-03Direction for special audit

Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner

Issued during scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or other proceedings at any stage Officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner with Commissioner approval
GST ADT-04Communication of findings of special audit

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66; carries the nominee auditor's observations and the officer's view

After receipt of special audit report from nominee auditor Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GSTR-9Annual return

Consolidated annual return capturing outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands/refunds; the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored

On or before 31 December of the year following the financial year Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-9CReconciliation statement

Self-certified reconciliation between the value of supplies declared in the annual return and the audited annual financial statement, along with reconciliation of tax paid and ITC

Filed along with GSTR-9 by 31 December of the year following the financial year, where turnover exceeds five crore rupees Common Portal (self-certified by registered person)
DRC-01AIntimation of tax ascertained as payable

Pre-show-cause-notice intimation by the proper officer of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; carries Part A with officer's quantification and Part B for registered person's reply

Issued before formal SCN under Section 73 or 74; reply within the time allowed Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued, taxpayer responds Part B)
DRC-03Voluntary payment intimation

Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings

At any time before issuance of SCN or within the period allowed under the SCN Common Portal (taxpayer)
DRC-01Show cause notice under Section 73 or 74

Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds

Issued at least three months before the time-limit for adjudication order under Section 73(10); six months under Section 74(10) Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)

GST Audit Support in Ennore, Chennai 600057

Ennore is the northern port and power belt of Chennai centred on Kamarajar Port the Ennore Thermal Power Station and Vallur power complex. Because PIN 600057 sits inside the Chennai North jurisdiction, the handling office for Ennore stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Businesses registered in Ennore share the Chennai North jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Manali Division each time. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Ennore businesses tie back to the Manali Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works.

The businesses clustered around Kamarajar Port in Ennore drive the bulk of the GST Audit Support workload we see each cycle. Most commerce in Ennore — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Audit Support working file we maintain for clients here. Document pickup near Kamarajar Port is a same-hour errand for our Ennore engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Working in Ennore brings a logistical edge: proximity to Kamarajar Port and the Ennore Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast.

Because Ennore hosts a cluster of heavy engineering businesses, we benchmark each new GST Audit Support engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. Sector concentration matters: when Ennore leans toward heavy engineering, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. The heavy engineering firms we serve in Ennore value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for heavy engineering firms near Ennore to know where the department usually probes.

We keep a repeatable GST Audit Support checklist for Ennore so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. Every GST Audit Support file we open for Ennore is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. Turnaround for Ennore GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Our Ennore GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.

A client relocating between Ennore and Tiruvottiyur keeps the same GST Audit Support file and the same team. Serving Ennore and Tiruvottiyur from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. Coverage from Ennore naturally extends to Tiruvottiyur, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow. Group companies spread across Ennore and Tiruvottiyur consolidate their GST Audit Support under one engagement with us.

Over several cycles in Ennore, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Each engagement in Ennore adds to a record of what the Chennai North jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. The longer we serve Ennore, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Recurring gaps in Ennore power generation records are the first thing our GST Audit Support review closes out.

Relocating a registered office into Ennore (PIN 600057) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Audit Support transition cleanly. Incorporating in Ennore comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. For a new business incorporating in Ennore or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. Shifting principal place of business to Ennore means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai North, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

GST Audit Support in Ennore — Complete Guide

At FilingPro we treat GST audit support as a continuous record-retention discipline, not a reactive scramble. Section 35 books, Section 36 6-year retention, monthly GSTR-2B downloads, RCM register, e-invoice IRN logs and Section 17(5) workings — all maintained through the year so that an ADT-01 notice can be answered with documentary completeness rather than reconstruction.

GST Audit Support in Ennore, Chennai

Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Ennore businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.

GST Audit Consultant in Ennore — Section 65 and Section 66 Expert

A dedicated GST audit consultant in Ennore prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

ADT-01 Notice Reply and ADT-02 Findings Defence in Ennore

On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Expert in Ennore — Above ₹5 Crore Turnover

For Ennore businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your GST Audit Support in Ennore. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹5,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — GST Audit Support in Ennore
Section 65 departmental audit handled end-to-end for Ennore clients — ADT-01 to ADT-04 closure with zero adverse demand.
15 working days notice window under Rule 101(2) used for full records compilation — no last-minute scramble at audit start.
GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation prepared in advance — variances explained before the audit team raises queries.
Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC reconciliation tied line-item to GSTR-2B and audited books — no Table 8 mismatch demand.
Section 17(5) blocked-credit workings — motor vehicles personal use, food and beverages, club membership, works contract — pre-disclosed in audit file.
RCM register reconstructed for advocate, GTA, security and director payments — Section 9(3) compliance demonstrated to audit team.
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 for Ennore businesses above ₹5 crore AATO — Notification 10/2023 compliance evidenced.
ADT-02 findings replied with Tvl. Diya Agencies and Tvl. Raja Stores case-law where supplier-default ITC reversal is proposed.
DRC-03 voluntary closure filed where findings accepted — ADT-04 closure obtained without DRC-01 SCN escalation under Section 73/74.
Section 66 special audit coordination with Commissioner-nominated CA — 90-day report timeline managed with full record access.
People Also Ask — GST Audit Support in Ennore
What is the difference between Section 65 and Section 66 GST audit?
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the place of business, with ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance and 3-month completion (extendable to 6 months). Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with Commissioner's approval) and conducted by an external Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, with 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days). Section 66 audit cost is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5).
How long must GST records be kept for audit?
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the registered person is party to any appeal, revision or proceeding, retention extends to one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later. Cancellation of registration does not extinguish this obligation.
What happens if I do not respond to ADT-01 audit notice?
Non-response leads to ex-parte audit on the basis of available returns and information. Findings communicated via ADT-02 will be unfavourable since the taxpayer's books and reconciliations are absent. The proper officer can then issue DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74 followed by adjudication order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating tax demand with interest and penalty.
Can I voluntarily pay tax based on audit findings?
Yes. Where ADT-02 findings are accepted, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and applicable penalty) can be voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. The proper officer then issues ADT-04 closure order. Voluntary payment under DRC-03 also helps avoid the DRC-01 SCN route under Section 73 or 74.
Is GSTR-9C audit by a CA still mandatory?
No. From FY 2020-21 onwards (Finance Act 2021 amendments) GSTR-9C is self-certified by the registered person, not certified by an external CA. The reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is prepared and filed by the taxpayer alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December, where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in the financial year.
Can the same period be audited twice under GST?
Generally no. Once Section 65 audit is completed and ADT-04 closure order is issued, the same period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Section 66 special audit is a separate power and may be ordered if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
Can ADT-02 findings be challenged before first appeal under Section 107?

ADT-02 itself is a finding, not a demand. The demand crystallises only through a subsequent DRC-01 SCN and the consequential DRC-07 order. First appeal under Section 107 against that order lies within three months on a ten per cent pre-deposit of disputed tax.

What is the Suncraft Energy ruling on supplier-default ITC?

Suncraft Energy Pvt Ltd v Assistant Commissioner of the Calcutta High Court holds that input tax credit available to a bona fide recipient cannot be defeated solely on supplier-side default in GSTR-1 filing or tax payment, where the recipient holds valid invoices and discharged consideration including tax.

What is the Bharti Airtel ruling relevant to audit-stage rectification?

Union of India v Bharti Airtel of the Supreme Court recognises the right to rectification of bona fide errors in GSTR-3B. The ratio is invoked at audit stage to seek directions for portal-blocked corrections through DRC-03 where the succeeding-period route under Section 39(9) has lapsed.

What is the Madras High Court ruling in Tvl Diya Agencies on ITC?

Tvl Diya Agencies v State Tax Officer holds that supplier-side default cannot mechanically defeat recipient credit without enquiry into the supplier and a finding on the recipient's bona fides. The ratio is widely relied upon in audit replies and ADT-02 defences in {{area_name}}.

How does the Madras HC approach jurisdictional review of audit notices?

Madras High Court routinely entertains Article 226 writs where ADT-01 or ADT-02 shows want of recorded reasons or overlap with an earlier audit on the same period. Reliance is placed on GKN Driveshafts and Kranti Associates discipline for speaking-order foundation.

What is Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciliation?

Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles input tax credit availed in GSTR-3B against credit appearing in GSTR-2A or static GSTR-2B for the financial year. It is the most common audit-checkpoint and variances must be supported by supplier-wise documentation at audit.

What Ennore clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Ennore, on the Manali-Tiruvottiyur corridor that passes through Ennore; where port services businesses dominate the local compliance profile.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Gst Audit Support

Localised for Ennore, Chennai — where port services businesses dominate the local compliance profile.

Reading this guide locally — Across Ennore, on the Manali-Tiruvottiyur corridor that passes through Ennore.

What is a GST audit and where does it sit in the compliance architecture

Self-certification under GSTR-9C and its audit interplay

Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.

Comparative framework — VAT/CST audits versus GST audit

Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.

Statutory framework under Chapter XIII of the CGST Act

The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.

Section 66 special audit by CA / CMA

Procedural sequence under Section 66(2) to 66(5)

Once the Section 66(1) opinion is formed and Commissioner's approval obtained, Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit a report duly signed and certified, in such form as prescribed (Form ADT-04), within ninety days; this period can be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the CA/CMA, with the Commissioner's permission. Section 66(3) requires that the registered person be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on the basis of the special audit and proposed to be used in any proceeding against him. Section 66(4) clarifies that the expenses of the examination and audit, including remuneration of the CA/CMA, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner. Section 66(5) preserves the proper officer's power to take further proceedings (SCN under Section 73 / 74) on the basis of the special audit findings.

Independence of Section 66 from prior audits or returns acceptance

Section 66(6) is a critical safeguard from the revenue's perspective — it provides that nothing in Section 66 shall be construed to debar the registered person from filing returns or paying tax, or to debar the proper officer from taking any action against the registered person under any other provision. The provision is non-derogating; a Section 66 special audit can be invoked even after a Section 65 departmental audit has been completed, where the proper officer forms a fresh opinion on value or credit complexity. Comparative jurisprudence in pre-GST excise (similar provision in Section 14A of the Central Excise Act before its omission) and service tax (Section 72A of the Finance Act 1994) had similar non-derogation features. The registered person's defence at the Section 66 stage rests primarily on the Section 75 opportunity-of-being-heard and the nature-of-complexity threshold.

Comparative framework — special audit in income tax and GST

The income-tax framework has a parallel under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 — special audit can be directed where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the nature and complexity of the accounts, the volume of accounts, doubts about the correctness of the accounts, multiplicity of transactions in the accounts or specialised nature of business activity, is of the opinion that it is necessary in the interests of revenue. Pre-GST excise had Section 14A; service tax had Section 72A. The architectural unity across these provisions is that special audit is a complexity-triggered intervention requiring a substantive opinion plus a procedural safeguard. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents a similar 'specialist audit' tier in several mature tax jurisdictions, reserved for complex high-revenue cases.

ADT-01 intimation

Form, contents and statutory basis

Form GST ADT-01 is the audit-initiation intimation prescribed under Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules 2017. The form is generated by the proper officer (or audit officer authorised by the Commissioner) and served on the registered person at least fifteen working days before the date proposed for commencement of audit. ADT-01 contains the GSTIN and legal name of the registered person, the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year), the place where audit will be conducted (place of business or office of the proper officer), the date of audit commencement, and a schedule of documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, returns including GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, declarations, internal-audit reports, agreements material to the tax position, and any other document the audit team specifies. The fifteen-day window is a statutory taxpayer right under Section 65(3) read with Rule 101(2).

Responding to ADT-01 — documentation readiness

Upon receipt of ADT-01, the registered person's first task is to map the document-schedule against actual maintained records and identify any gaps. Where records are incomplete (typically Rule 56 stock registers, Rule 89 refund working papers, or reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f)), the fifteen-day window is the opportunity for reconstruction. The Goetze (India) v CIT (2006) Supreme Court principle on the inability to make fresh claims outside the return framework (decided in the income-tax context) is sometimes invoked at the audit stage to deny ITC claims not appearing in original returns; the counter-position rests on Section 16(4) timeline arguments and the principle that audit is a verification not a re-assessment. Document submission within the fifteen-day window aligns the formal commencement of audit under Section 65(4) Explanation and tightens the three-month closure clock.

Seeking extension of the audit-commencement date

Where genuine grounds exist — pending statutory audit of financial statements, key personnel unavailability, or recent migration of accounting systems — the registered person can seek extension of the audit commencement date by written representation. The audit team has administrative discretion under Rule 101 to grant reasonable extensions, generally up to thirty additional days; longer extensions require Commissioner-level approval. The extension must be sought before the proposed commencement date and supported by documentary evidence (statutory auditor engagement letter, employee leave records, ERP migration plans). The OECD Forum on Tax Administration best-practice benchmarks recognise such extensions as a taxpayer-rights safeguard, balanced against the audit-closure timeline.

ADT-02 audit report

Disagreement options post ADT-02

Where the registered person disagrees with one or more ADT-02 findings, the response options are: (a) file a Section 75 representation seeking re-consideration before the SCN stage; (b) await the SCN under Section 73 or 74 and contest at that stage; (c) where the audit findings are perceived as jurisdictionally infirm, file a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ remedy is typically reserved for jurisdictional infirmities — absence of Commissioner approval under Section 66, breach of the Section 65(4) timeline, denial of Section 75 opportunity of hearing — rather than for merit-based challenges. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) lines of authority offer guidance on writ-jurisdictional questions in audit and assessment matters.

Form, statutory basis and contents

Form GST ADT-02 is the audit-closure report prescribed under Rule 101(5) of the CGST Rules and Section 65(7) of the CGST Act. Upon completion of the audit, the proper officer is required to issue ADT-02 within thirty days informing the registered person of the findings, the rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. ADT-02 captures the period audited, the audit observations under each verification head (turnover, ITC, refund, classification, rate, valuation), the proper officer's conclusion on each observation, the tax / interest / penalty quantum where applicable, and the rights of the registered person to dispute or accept the findings. The form is the formal closure of the audit cycle and the trigger for the next-stage decision — voluntary DRC-03 payment, SCN under Section 73 or 74, or no-action closure.

Reading the audit-observations and proper-officer reasoning

ADT-02 audit observations are structured around the verification heads — turnover under Section 9 read with Section 7, taxable value under Section 15, rate of tax under the rate notifications, ITC under Sections 16 to 21, refund under Sections 54 and 55, and miscellaneous compliance. Each observation typically includes the audit team's working, the discrepancy quantum, the section / rule under which the proposed addition is framed, and the proper officer's reasoning. The Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on reasoned orders applies — the proper officer's reasoning must engage with the registered person's explanations and cannot be a mechanical reproduction of audit-team working. Where reasoning is absent or perfunctory, the registered person has stronger grounds in subsequent Section 73 / 74 proceedings or in a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226.

What Ennore clients usually ask next: On the ground in Ennore, where port services businesses dominate the local compliance profile; for Ennore units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

Terms you will hear in this area — Across Ennore, where port services businesses dominate the local compliance profile.

Reverse charge audit

Reverse charge audit is the subset of audit observations examining whether tax has been correctly paid by the recipient under sub-section (3) or (4) of Section 9 on notified supplies — goods transport agency, advocate services, sponsorship and others. The audit also tests whether ITC on RCM-paid tax has been availed only after payment of tax.

Composition audit

Composition audit is the audit of taxpayers paying tax under Section 10 of the CGST Act. The audit verifies turnover slabs, prohibited supplies (inter-State, e-commerce, ice-cream, pan masala, tobacco), maintenance of CMP filings and the rate of composition applied. CMP-08 quarterly statements and GSTR-4 annual return are the principal documents.

E-invoice audit

E-invoice audit examines compliance with the e-invoicing framework notified under sub-rule (4) of Rule 48 for taxpayers with aggregate turnover above the prescribed threshold. The audit traces invoice reference number (IRN), QR-code generation and reporting on the Invoice Registration Portal across the audited financial periods.

E-way bill audit

E-way bill audit is the examination of e-way bills generated under sub-rule (1) of Rule 138 for movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees. Audit observations typically address mismatches between e-way bill data, tax invoice data and GSTR-1 outward supply declarations.

Place of supply

Place of supply is determined under Chapter V of the IGST Act and dictates whether a supply is intra-State (CGST plus SGST) or inter-State (IGST). Audit observations on place of supply typically address services supplied to recipients in other States, goods movements without invoicing and exports without LUT.

Departmental audit

Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the GST department under Section 65 of the CGST Act covering a registered person for one or more financial years, commenced by ADT-01 and concluded by ADT-02, usually completed at the registered place of business or office of the proper officer.

Special audit

Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 by the Commissioner where the proper officer is of the opinion that the value or credit availed has not been correctly declared; it is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner and triggered by Form ADT-03.

ADT-01 notice

ADT-01 is the statutory intimation of audit issued by the proper officer at least fifteen working days before the date on which the audit is proposed to commence, specifying the period, place and the documents required to be made available.

ADT-02 closure

ADT-02 is the form in which the proper officer communicates the audit findings, rights and obligations to the registered person within thirty days of completion of the audit; observations in ADT-02 typically feed into a subsequent Section 73 or Section 74 demand notice if tax has not been voluntarily paid.

ADT-03 direction

ADT-03 is the direction issued under Section 66(1) by the Commissioner to a registered person requiring submission to special audit by a nominated chartered or cost accountant; the audit report is to be submitted within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause.

Audit period

Audit period under Section 65(4) is the period from the date of commencement of audit at the registered person's premises or the date on which records are first made available, up to ninety days extendable by another ninety days by the Commissioner where the audit cannot be completed within the ordinary window.

Pre-ADT-02 window

Pre-ADT-02 window is the practical window between draft observation by the audit officer and issuance of formal ADT-02, during which the registered person can file a written reply, produce additional records and make voluntary DRC-03 payments under Section 73(5) to avoid penalty exposure.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
Section 122(2)(b) penalty proposed at audit on contractor for supplier-default ITC; defence sustainedReversal of ₹2,30,000 only₹41,400 (18% over 12 months)Nil (Section 122(2)(b) dropped on Diya Agencies)₹2,71,400
Stock variance ₹24,00,000 at audit visit; Section 17(5)(h) reversal of ₹78,000 on written-off goods₹78,000 (reversal only)₹14,040 (18% over 12 months)₹7,800 (10% under Section 73(9))₹99,840
Section 129 penalty exposure on six e-way bill defective consignments for cement transporter₹47,000 (on ₹2,60,000 value)Not applicable to Section 129₹94,000 (200% of tax under Section 129(1)(a) for unregistered owner)₹1,41,000
OIDAR services to overseas recipients ₹48,00,000 audit-flagged as taxable; export defence sustainedNil (zero-rated upheld)NilNilNil
Section 15(3) post-supply discount ₹22,00,000 disallowed at audit; defence sustained on twin conditionNil (defence sustained)NilNilNil
Section 122(1)(ii) penalty proposal of ₹3,00,000 on clerical invoicing irregularity; reduced on proportionalityNil (tax paid in time)Nil₹25,000 (Section 125 general penalty)₹25,000

How Ennore businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Ennore, the cluster of port services, power generation, heavy engineering businesses that defines Ennore's commercial fabric; for Ennore units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Ennore

How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Ennore, where port services businesses dominate the local compliance profile. Practitioners note that the cluster of port services, power generation, heavy engineering businesses that defines Ennore's commercial fabric.

Logistics
Common issue: Goods Transport Agency (GTA) operators under Section 65 audit face the Notification 13/2017-CT(R) forward-charge versus reverse-charge election complexity. From 18 July 2022, GTAs have an annual option under Notification 03/2022-CT(R) to pay 12% with ITC (forward charge) by Annexure-V declaration; many GTAs missed the deadline and face audit additions for incorrect tax structure.
How we handle it: Reconstruct the Annexure-V filing position for each year; where the declaration was missed, default to reverse-charge by recipient and ensure invoices carry the prescribed RCM legend under Rule 46 proviso. Reconcile e-way bill data with GSTR-1 RCM disclosures; voluntarily disclose any forward-charge collections through DRC-03 if classification is incorrect.
Logistics
Common issue: Courier and last-mile logistics players under audit face Section 65 reconciliation between e-way bill data, GSTR-1 outward supplies, and FASTag / toll-data trails. Where consignment movements appear on e-way bill portal but are missed in GSTR-1, the audit team treats the gap as suppressed turnover and proposes Section 74 fraud framing.
How we handle it: Reconcile e-way bill download (EWB-01 generated and received) monthly to GSTR-1; preserve consignor declarations under Rule 138 for inter-State movements. Where genuine gaps exist (e.g. consignment cancelled but e-way bill not voided), document the cancellation under Rule 138(9) and voluntarily disclose any residual revenue impact through DRC-03.
Education
Common issue: Coaching institutes and edtech firms under audit face classification disputes between exempt educational services (Notification 12/2017-CT(R) entry 66 for school education up to higher secondary) and taxable commercial coaching at 18% under SAC 9992. The audit team also scrutinises faculty-payment Section 194J income-tax TDS interaction and visits the GST-side input services apportionment.
How we handle it: Demarcate revenue heads in books between exempt and taxable arms; apply Rule 42 segregation on common ITC. For aggregated edtech subscriptions covering both school content and commercial coaching, file a representation drawing on Circular 149/05/2021-GST classification logic and seek a one-time settlement of the residual via DRC-03.
Real Estate
Common issue: Real-estate developers face Section 65 audits centred on Notification 03/2019-CT(R) scheme compliance — the 1% affordable / 5% non-affordable scheme without ITC versus the legacy 8%/12% with ITC option. Project-wise ITC apportionment, mandatory 80% procurement-from-registered-supplier ratio under Rule 42 fifth proviso, and reverse-charge on the shortfall are common audit triggers.
How we handle it: Maintain project-wise ITC ledgers and 80% procurement tracker by financial year; compute the shortfall reverse-charge under Notification 07/2019-CT(R) at the developer end and pay through DRC-03 at year close. Preserve the annexure-IV scheme declaration per project as the primary defence to scheme classification queries.
Real Estate
Common issue: Commercial property owners with multi-tenant rentals under audit face Rule 42 apportionment scrutiny where residential portions (exempt) and commercial portions (taxable at 18% under SAC 9972) coexist in the same building. The audit team also examines TDS under Section 51 where government tenants are involved, often computing TDS credit in cash ledger against output.
How we handle it: Segregate ITC at building level into residential-exclusive, commercial-exclusive and common-use buckets per Rule 42 architecture. For government tenants deducting Section 51 GST TDS, reconcile GSTR-7A certificates with cash-ledger credit monthly and ensure offset within the audit period; preserve all REG-07 deductor records.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

A flavour of cases we handle nearby — Across Ennore, where port services businesses dominate the local compliance profile.

Notification 14/2022Logistics

Notification 14/2022 cross-utilisation clarification used at audit for a {{area_name}} logistics firm

Issue: A logistics firm in {{area_name}} received an ADT-02 alleging incorrect cross-utilisation of IGST credit against CGST and SGST liability in a sequence that diverged from the order in Notification 14/2022-Central Tax read with Rule 88A, with a proposed interest demand of approximately four lakh rupees.
Approach: We mapped the electronic credit ledger utilisation sequence period by period, demonstrated compliance with the notified order, and where minor sequencing slippage was visible, reconstructed the corrected ledger and paid Section 50(3) interest through DRC-03 on the differential utilisation cost.
Outcome: ADT-02 was revised; interest demand confined to fifty-four thousand rupees on the genuine slippage period; the bulk was dropped; the sequencing discipline was made part of the monthly reconciliation routine.
GTA forward-chargeGoods transport

GTA forward-charge election defended at audit for a {{area_name}} transporter

Issue: A goods-transport agency in {{area_name}} received an ADT-01 audit on a contention that its forward-charge election under Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 3/2022 was invalid for the relevant year, with a proposed demand of approximately fifteen lakh rupees on a deemed RCM-only basis.
Approach: We produced the Annexure V declaration filed before the fifteenth of March of the preceding financial year, the corresponding GSTR-1 invoices issued under twelve per cent forward charge with ITC, and the recipient confirmations. The audit reply traced the notification chronology and the option-effect dates.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the forward-charge election; the fifteen lakh rupee deemed-RCM demand was dropped; subsequent year Annexure V was filed within window to preserve the election.
E-way bill complianceCement transport

Section 65 audit on e-way bill compliance defended for a {{area_name}} cement transporter

Issue: A cement transporter in {{area_name}} received an ADT-01 audit on alleged e-way bill non-compliance under Rule 138 for inter-state movements of approximately fifty-six lakh rupees in value over a twelve-month window, with a proposed penalty under Section 129 of approximately ten lakh rupees.
Approach: We produced the e-way bill register, matched each consignment to the tax invoice, the transporter LR, and the recipient GRN. Where Part-B was generated late, the cure was demonstrated within validity. Section 129(3) penalty quantum was disputed on the documentary-completeness ground recognised in Madhya Pradesh HC rulings.
Outcome: ADT-02 confined the Section 129 penalty exposure to ninety-four thousand rupees on six consignments where Part-B was genuinely missing at interception risk; the bulk was dropped; the matter closed without DRC-01.
ADT-02 negotiationLogistics

Audit-closure meeting where the officer agreed to drop ₹11 lakh after a partner-level review

Issue: A logistics company in Madhavaram with ₹31 crore turnover was at the draft-ADT-02 stage with five proposed adverse findings totalling ₹19 lakh. The earlier consultant had accepted three of them (₹8 lakh) and was about to accept the remaining two (₹11 lakh) — one on ITC on motor-vehicle repairs under Section 17(5)(ab) and another on GTA RCM mismatch. The client engaged us for a second opinion two days before the scheduled closure meeting.
Approach: We re-examined both findings overnight. On motor-vehicle repairs we showed that the vehicles in question were goods carriages of GVW > 7.5 tonnes used in 'transportation of goods' — squarely within the proviso to Section 17(5)(ab), making the credit eligible. On the GTA RCM mismatch we reconciled GSTR-3B Table 3.1(d) outward to the FCM/RCM split in the GTA's invoices and showed that the ₹6 lakh apparent mismatch was an FY-boundary timing issue not a substantive short-payment. We requested a partner-led closure meeting with documentary backup.
Outcome: At the closure meeting the audit officer agreed to drop both adverse findings; ADT-02 was issued with three observations totalling ₹8 lakh (the ones the earlier consultant had correctly accepted); the ₹11 lakh saved against ₹19 lakh proposed; the second-opinion engagement converted into a permanent audit-defence retainer; office now offers a standalone 'pre-closure-meeting review' service for clients who came in late.

Why these Ennore engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Ennore, the business activity radiating outward from Kamarajar Port and nearby commercial pockets; for Ennore units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.

Client Reviews

What Ennore Clients Say

Ramanathan K
GST Audit Support
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Sundararajan M
GST Audit Support
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha S
GST Audit Support
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Venkatraman P
GST Audit Support
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
1 month agoVerified Client
Prabhakaran T
GST Audit Support
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Lakshmi V
GST Audit Support
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
4 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

GST Audit Support FAQ — Ennore

Common questions from Ennore clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

ADT-03 is the order under Section 66(1) directing a special audit by a nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. ADT-01 in contrast is the Section 65 departmental audit notice issued before the proper officer commences audit. ADT-03 is therefore an order — not a notice — and the audit is conducted by an external professional, not departmental officers.
Section 65 audit can be undertaken for any financial year or part thereof. There is no fixed lookback in the section itself, but Section 35(3) mandates record retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — so the practical lookback is 5 to 6 financial years. A second audit of the same period is barred unless fresh material is discovered.
Yes. Every GST Audit Support engagement is handled with strict confidentiality — your documents and data are used only for your work and never shared. Ennore clients deal with the same trusted team throughout, so your information stays in one place.
Under Section 65 read with Rule 101, the Commissioner or an authorised officer may undertake audit of a registered person for any financial year or part thereof. ADT-01 notice is issued at least 15 working days before commencement. The audit must be completed within 3 months from the date of commencement (extendable up to 6 months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded).
Section 36(1) read with Rule 56(15) recognises electronic records — accounting software ledgers, e-invoice IRN logs, e-way bill register and digital purchase registers. The audit team typically requests Tally backups, Excel registers, GSTR-2B downloads and bank statement PDFs for the audit period. Records must be authentic, complete and auditable in their electronic form.
We review GST Audit Support work carefully before submission to avoid errors in the first place. If a genuine issue ever arises on something we filed for a Ennore client, we help set it right — standing behind our work is part of the service.
GSTR-9C is the reconciliation statement between GSTR-9 annual return figures and the audited financial statements. From FY 2020-21 onwards, registered persons with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore in a financial year must self-certify and file GSTR-9C alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December of the following year. The earlier requirement of CA certification was withdrawn through the Finance Act 2021 amendments.
There are three categories. First, departmental audit under Section 65 conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the registered person's place of business. Second, special audit under Section 66 ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with prior approval) and conducted by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner. Third, self-certified reconciliation through GSTR-9C which a registered person above ₹5 crore aggregate turnover files alongside GSTR-9 from FY 2020-21 onwards.
Absolutely. Most Ennore clients complete the entire GST Audit Support process remotely — we collect documents on WhatsApp or email, share drafts for your approval, and file on your behalf. A visit to our Maduravoyal office is optional, never required.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit notice. Rule 101(2) requires it to be served at least 15 working days before the audit commences. The notice specifies the period under audit, place of audit, documents required and the authorised officer's name. The taxpayer should respond by collating the requested records before the start date.
Yes. The Madras High Court in Tvl. Raja Stores v. Assistant Commissioner (W.P. 33099/2022) held that Section 65 audit jurisdiction must be exercised in compliance with the 15 working days notice requirement and the 3-month completion timeline; orders passed without following ADT-01 procedure can be set aside. Several High Courts have also held that audit findings cannot be used to deny ITC where Section 16 conditions are otherwise met.
Your engagement is handled by our in-house team led by Ravivarman R (Founder, 15+ years, 500+ engagements), with M. E. Chokkalingam on compliance and S. Jayaprakash on GST matters. You deal with named, qualified people throughout your GST Audit Support — not a call centre.
Section 65(1) gives the proper officer the power to conduct audit either at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. In practice for most Ennore businesses the audit is conducted at the principal place of business so books, records and statutory registers can be inspected on-site.
Recurring findings include — ITC mismatch between GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B, Section 17(5) blocked credits wrongly availed (motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships), RCM not paid on advocate fees and GTA, e-way bill missing for consignments above ₹50,000, e-invoice non-compliance for taxpayers above ₹5 crore AATO, HSN summary errors in GSTR-1 Table 12, and Schedule III adjustments not made for related-party transactions.
Yes. GST audit is GSTIN-wise — each registration has its own books, returns and assessment. A Tamil Nadu GSTIN of a multi-state business is audited separately from its Karnataka or Telangana GSTIN by the respective state's CGST or SGST authority. Records must therefore be maintained GSTIN-wise even where the underlying ERP is consolidated.
On receipt of ADT-01, immediately collate — 12 months of GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns, audited financial statements, GSTR-2B downloads month-wise, ITC ledger with Section 17(5) reversals, e-invoice IRN logs, e-way bill register, RCM register and DSC. Prepare GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation, Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation and a Section 17(5) workings sheet before the audit team arrives.
GST Audit Support near Ennore:

We serve businesses in every part of Ennore, from 10th Street, 11th Main Road, 13th Cross Street, 14th Cross Street and 4th street to the 5th street, Chennai - Ennore Expressway Road, Chennai - Ennore Road and Chennai - Ennore Road Tunnel commercial pockets, with GST Audit Support handled end to end.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert GST Audit Support in Ennore?

Professional GST Audit Support in Ennore, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp