GST Revocation delivery for residential and jewellery firms across Mandaveli — backed by a 15+ year track record
Mandaveli residential and jewellery units around Mandaveli MRTS — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.
Notification 03/2023 dated 31-Mar-2023 provided a one-time amnesty allowing revocation applications for cancellation orders passed up to 31-Dec-2022, where the 90/180 day window had expired, by filing REG-21 by 30-Jun-2023 (later extended by Notification 24/2023 to 31-Aug-2023) on conditions of return filing and full tax payment.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Revocation in Mandaveli — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Section 47 late fee (₹50/day, ₹20/day NIL) and Section 50 interest at 18% per annum on net cash liability are computed period-by-period and discharged through PMT-06 / DRC-03 before REG-21 — eliminating the most common rejection ground.
For Mandaveli cases between 90 and 180 days, we draft the Commissioner extension request with a detailed sufficient cause affidavit covering illness, family bereavement, accountant default or business disruption — converting time-barred cases into within-window cases.
Where the officer issues REG-23 minded to reject, our reply is drafted and filed within the 7-working-day window with supporting evidence and case-law citations. Personal hearing representation under Rule 23(3) is included at no extra cost.
For Mandaveli cases beyond 180 days, we file a writ petition before the Madras HC under Article 226 citing Tvl Suguna Cutpiece (W.P. 25048/2021) and Aap and Co. natural justice principles to direct the department to consider belated revocation.
Notification 03/2023-Central Tax (read with 24/2023) provided amnesty for cancellation orders upto 31-Dec-2022. Where applicable, we leverage this notification to file REG-21 outside the regular window on amnesty conditions.
Cancellation order, pending invoices, bank statements and authorised signatory DSC details are shared via WhatsApp at 9566-068-468. Entire revocation handled remotely for Mandaveli clients.
Every GST Revocation engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Mandaveli, the cluster of residential, jewellery, retail businesses that defines Mandaveli's commercial fabric; served by short connections to Mylapore and Alwarpet and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Mandaveli clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Mandaveli, the business activity radiating outward from Mandaveli MRTS and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Mandaveli: For Mandaveli engagements specifically — for Mandaveli's premium business segment that values fixed-fee compliance with senior-practitioner involvement.
Cash challan used to deposit tax, interest, late fee and penalty into the Electronic Cash Ledger; balance is then debited against return filings preceding REG-21
Form for voluntary payments of tax or interest discovered during arrears reconciliation; used where the cause of cancellation involves under-declared liability
Appeal against the REG-05 order rejecting revocation, filed under Section 107 before the First Appellate Authority with the prescribed pre-deposit
Electronic application by a taxpayer for revocation of suo motu cancellation under Section 29(2); requires furnishing of all pending returns and payment of dues before submission is accepted by the common portal
Order passed by the proper officer revoking the suo motu cancellation and restoring the GSTIN; communicated electronically through the common portal
Notice issued by the proper officer where prima facie grounds exist to reject the REG-21 revocation application — typically incomplete returns, unpaid arrears, or insufficient reasoning for delay
Taxpayer's reply to REG-23 carrying clarifications, documentary proof of return-filing, payment challans, and submissions on reasonable cause for delay
Order of the proper officer rejecting the REG-21 revocation application after considering REG-24 reply or where no reply is received within the prescribed time
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is the substantive provision empowering a registered person whose registration has been cancelled suo motu by the proper officer under Section 29(2) to seek restoration. Sub-section (1) of Section 30 provides that the application shall be filed in the prescribed manner within ninety days from the date of service of the cancellation order. The first proviso, as substituted by the Finance Act 2023, empowers the Commissioner or an officer authorised by him to extend the said period of ninety days by such further period not exceeding one hundred and eighty days. It is to be noted that revocation is available only against suo motu cancellation and not against voluntary cancellation under Section 29(1).
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 23 of the CGST Rules prescribes Form GST REG-21 as the application for revocation, filed electronically on the common portal. The application must accompany payment of all dues, filing of all pending returns and payment of late fee and interest. Sub-rule (2) requires the proper officer, on being satisfied, to revoke the cancellation in Form REG-22 within thirty days. Sub-rule (3) prescribes Form REG-23 as the show-cause where the officer proposes to reject the revocation application, calling for reply in Form REG-24 within seven working days.
View sourceRule 22 prescribes the procedure preceding suo motu cancellation under Section 29(2). Sub-rule (1) requires issuance of show-cause in Form REG-17, reply in Form REG-18 within seven working days, and order of cancellation in Form REG-19 within thirty days of reply. Sub-rule (4) is critical for revocation practice — if the taxpayer files all pending returns and pays the dues during the pendency of cancellation proceedings, the officer may drop the proceedings by passing an order in Form REG-20, obviating the need for revocation under Section 30 altogether.
View sourceSection 47 prescribes the late fee payable for delayed furnishing of returns under Section 39 read with Section 37. Sub-section (1) of Section 47 imposes a late fee of two hundred rupees per day (one hundred CGST and one hundred SGST) subject to a maximum of five thousand rupees per return. It is to be noted that the late fee is payable for every pending return that the taxpayer files as a precondition for the revocation application, and Notification 07/2023-Central Tax provides a specific cap for revocation cases where returns relate to financial years up to 2021-22.
View sourceClause (e) of sub-section (2) of Section 29 empowers cancellation of registrations obtained by means of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Sub-section (2) of Section 29 read with the proviso permits cancellation with retrospective effect in such cases. Revocation under Section 30 against a cancellation under clause (e) is procedurally available but practically difficult — the taxpayer has to demonstrate that no fraud or misstatement existed, which often migrates the dispute to the appellate forum under Section 107.
View sourceSection 50 levies interest at eighteen per cent per annum on tax paid after the due date prescribed under Section 39. Sub-section (1) of Section 50 applies to all delayed cash payments, while the proviso, inserted with retrospective effect from 1 July 2017, limits the interest computation to the net cash liability (excluding ITC-discharged portion). Interest is a non-negotiable component of the dues that must be paid before REG-21 can be entertained, and unlike late fee it is not capped by any notification.
View sourceMandaveli is a premium residential locality adjacent to Mylapore, with a strong jewellery, boutique retail and dining presence. GST clients are typically jewellery showrooms (3% GST, e-invoicing scrutiny), boutiques and small specialty retail. Statutory correspondence for Mandaveli businesses routes through the Mylapore Division, so we align every GST Revocation engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Every Mandaveli engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600028, the Mylapore Division, and the coordinates 13.0257, 80.2696 that anchor the locality. The 600xx geo-zone covering Mandaveli groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Mandaveli reads as a premium residential with jewellery and retail pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around Mandaveli MRTS and fed by the Mandaveli MRTS corridor. Document pickup near Mandaveli MRTS is a same-hour errand for our Mandaveli engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Vendors and customers tied to the Mandaveli MRTS network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Mandaveli GST Revocation clients. The businesses clustered around Mandaveli MRTS in Mandaveli drive the bulk of the GST Revocation workload we see each cycle.
retail units around Mandaveli share recurring GST Revocation patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. We have closed enough GST Revocation files for retail firms near Mandaveli to know where the department usually probes. Sector concentration matters: when Mandaveli leans toward retail, the GST Revocation risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. Because Mandaveli hosts a cluster of retail businesses, we benchmark each new GST Revocation engagement against patterns we already track for the locality.
The qualified-review step on every Mandaveli GST Revocation file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. A Mandaveli client sees the same GST Revocation cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. Our Mandaveli GST Revocation process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. Turnaround for Mandaveli GST Revocation is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed.
Coverage from Mandaveli naturally extends to Adyar, so group entities across the area share one GST Revocation workflow. We treat Mandaveli and Adyar as one catchment for GST Revocation, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Serving Mandaveli and Adyar from one team keeps GST Revocation turnaround identical across the cluster. Group companies spread across Mandaveli and Adyar consolidate their GST Revocation under one engagement with us.
The longer we serve Mandaveli, the more precisely we predict where a GST Revocation file needs attention. Sector signals in Mandaveli — seasonal jewellery swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Revocation work. Common patterns in the Mylapore Division give Mandaveli businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Revocation issues. Because we work repeatedly across Mandaveli, we can benchmark a new client's GST Revocation position against the locality norm.
When a Alwarpet business expands into Mandaveli, we extend its GST Revocation setup to PIN 600028 without disruption. A startup setting up near Sri Rama Krishna Mission Hospital in Mandaveli gets a GST Revocation foundation built for the Mylapore Division from day one. New boutique trade ventures in Mandaveli lean on us to stand up GST Revocation correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. First-time GST Revocation for a Mandaveli business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.
REG-21 revocation of suo motu cancelled GSTIN under Section 30 of the CGST Act for Mandaveli businesses, filed within the 90/180 day statutory window with all pending returns cleared and tax dues paid.
A dedicated GST revocation consultant in Mandaveli handles REG-19 cancellation order review, pending returns clearance, late fee and interest computation, REG-23 SCN reply and Commissioner extension requests beyond 90 days.
On-time REG-21 application within 90 days of the cancellation order in Mandaveli avoids the need for High Court writ remedy. Where the window has lapsed, Notification 03/2023 amnesty conditions and Tvl Suguna Cutpiece principles are invoked.
For time-barred cases beyond the 180-day outer limit in Mandaveli, writ remedy under Article 226 is pursued before the Madras High Court citing Tvl Suguna Cutpiece (W.P. 25048/2021) and Aap and Co. natural justice precedents.
Inward supplies received during the cancelled period require careful Section 16(2) eligibility examination on restoration. Where the supplier filed GSTR-1 and tax stood paid, the ITC may be claimed in the next GSTR-3B subject to time-limit under Section 16(4) for the relevant financial year.
Yes. Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan requires authorities disposing of objections to record reasons in their orders. Non-speaking REG-05 rejections that merely restate the show cause without engaging with the reply are routinely set aside in Section 107 appeals or Article 226 writs.
Goetze (India) v CIT held that fresh claims under the Income-tax Act required a revised return mechanism. The ratio is distinguishable in GST revocation since REG-21 is an administrative restoration with no statutory bar on contemporaneous ledger correction or rectification supported by documentary evidence.
Each REG-19 order requires a separate REG-21 application addressing the specific ground in that order. Where two orders exist, the first must be revoked through REG-22 before the second can be taken up; serial handling is the practical approach.
No statutory filing fee is prescribed for REG-21 on the common portal. The financial exposure at the revocation stage is the back-return late fee, tax-with-interest under Section 50, and where applicable the ten per cent pre-deposit if a Section 107 appeal follows a rejection.
The pre-cancellation LUT in Form RFD-11 is treated as inactive during the cancelled period. On REG-22 a fresh LUT must be filed for the remainder of the financial year; export consignments in the cancelled period may be regularised via revised invoices on restoration.
What Mandaveli clients want to know before signing: For Mandaveli engagements specifically — in the premium residential with jewellery and retail micro-market of Mandaveli.
Reading this guide locally — In Mandaveli, on the Mylapore-Alwarpet corridor that passes through Mandaveli.
Revocation of cancellation of registration occupies a distinct conceptual space within the GST framework, separate from cancellation under Section 29 and separate from fresh registration under Section 25. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had treated the registration register as the foundational ledger of the destination-based design; Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 operationalises a recovery pathway when that ledger entry is removed administratively without the underlying business having ceased. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat registration continuity as essential to credit-chain integrity, and revocation is the mechanism by which an inadvertent break in that chain is reversed without forcing the registered person to begin afresh. The conceptual distinction matters because revocation preserves the original Goods and Services Tax Identification Number, the input tax credit ledger balance accumulated up to the cancellation date, the turnover history, and the customer-side invoice linkages already captured in GSTR-2B at the recipient end. Fresh registration under Section 25 would lose all four of these continuity advantages, which is why Section 30 sits as a discrete remedial section within Chapter VI of the CGST Act.
Section 30(1) of the CGST Act opens with the phrase any registered person whose registration is cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion, which narrows the section's coverage to suo motu cancellations under Section 29(2). The grounds enumerated in Section 29(2) are: contravention of provisions of the Act or rules made thereunder under clause (a); non-furnishing of returns for a continuous period of six months under clause (c) for regular taxpayers and three consecutive tax periods under clause (b) for composition taxpayers; non-commencement of business within six months of voluntary registration under clause (d); and registration obtained by means of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts under clause (e). Section 30 covers all five clauses but the practical incidence is heavily concentrated in clause (c) non-filing cancellations. Where the cancellation is recorded under Section 29(1) at the registered person's own request through Form REG-16, Section 30 is not the appropriate route; fresh registration under Section 25 would apply.
Revocation as a procedural remedy operates within the federal architecture of Article 246A which empowers both Parliament and State Legislatures to make laws on GST and Article 279A which constitutes the GST Council as the recommending body. The 47th GST Council meeting at Chandigarh, the 48th meeting and the 49th meeting iteratively refined the procedural timelines around Section 30, recognising that the original ninety-day Section 30(1) window had proved too tight for many registered persons whose books were disrupted by the cancellation itself. The Council recommendations translated into Notification 03/2023-Central Tax and Notification 23/2023-Central Tax amnesty schemes, evidencing that the Section 30 architecture is responsive to operational realities rather than rigidly statutory. The State-side concurrent provision in each State GST Act mirrors Section 30 of the CGST Act, so revocation operates uniformly across CGST, SGST and IGST limbs of the same registered person's identity.
The ninety-day Section 30(1) window is conceptually shorter than the three-month appellate limitation under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act, but operationally they serve different remedial purposes. Section 30 is a return-filing-and-restoration route premised on the registered person accepting the underlying default and curing it; Section 107 is a merits-review route premised on contesting the cancellation itself. The comparative perspective matters when choosing the remedy: if the default is genuine and curable, Section 30 is the shorter and more reliable path; if the cancellation is itself contestable, for example where the consecutive-default count was wrongly computed or where the cancellation order is not a speaking order, Section 107 is the appropriate path even though it is procedurally longer. The two routes are not mutually exclusive; a registered person can pursue Section 30 first and reserve Section 107 as a fallback within its own limitation.
The ninety-day window under Section 30(1) runs from the day Form REG-19 is served on the registered person. Date of service is governed by Section 169 of the CGST Act which prescribes alternate modes including giving or tendering it directly, registered post or speed post with acknowledgement, communication through the email address provided at the time of registration, making it available on the common portal, publication in a newspaper, or affixing it in some conspicuous place. The most common mode for cancellation orders is portal-availability under Section 169(1)(d), with the date of service deemed to be the date on which the order is uploaded to the registered person's dashboard. The General Clauses Act 1897 principles on computation of period apply: the date of service is excluded from the count and the period ends at the close of the ninetieth day.
Operationally the ninety-day window must accommodate several discrete tasks before REG-21 can be filed. The Rule 23(1) precondition requires that all returns due for the cancellation default period are filed first along with payment of tax, interest, penalty and late fee. The reconstruction of GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for the default window typically takes between fifteen and thirty days depending on book quality and the length of the default period. The interest computation under Section 50 and late fee computation under Section 47 require head-wise tabulation. Practical milestone planning therefore allocates the first forty-five days to returns reconstruction and payment, the next fifteen days to REG-21 drafting and filing, and the residual thirty days as buffer for any REG-23 show cause notice that may be issued. Compressing the timeline below this allocation risks missed disclosures that translate into REG-23 queries.
An extension granted under the first proviso enlarges only the procedural window within which REG-21 must be filed; it does not relax the substantive Rule 23(1) preconditions. All returns due for the default period must still be filed, all tax and interest must still be paid, all late fee must still be discharged before REG-21 can be entertained. The practical implication is that the extension is most useful when the returns reconstruction itself is the bottleneck; once the returns are filed and the dues paid, the actual REG-21 filing is a relatively quick step that does not need the extra time. Strategic use of the extension therefore involves filing the extension application early in the original ninety-day window when it becomes apparent that the returns reconstruction will overrun, rather than waiting until the eighty-fifth day.
The documentation discipline for a first-proviso extension application has four elements that consistently survive review. First, a chronological narrative tying the cancellation date in REG-19 to the sufficient-cause event with specific dates. Second, supporting documents directly evidencing the cause: medical records for hospitalisation, FIR for theft of records, notification or government advisory for force-majeure. Third, an estimated timeline for completion of the residual tasks. Fourth, an undertaking to file REG-21 within the extended window. Where these four elements are present, the extension order is typically issued within fifteen working days. Where any element is missing, the application is more likely to receive a deficiency query under Rule 90(3) read with the procedural framework, extending the timeline materially. Documentation discipline at the application stage is therefore the highest-leverage practitioner contribution.
The first-proviso extension under Section 30(1) is sought through a formal application to the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner having jurisdiction, accompanied by documentary evidence of the sufficient cause being relied on. The application is filed on the common portal in the prescribed format read with the jurisdictional commissionerate's standing instructions. The application must be filed within the original ninety-day window; an application filed after the ninetieth day generally does not meet the statutory requirement of being within the said period. The Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner records reasons in writing while granting or refusing the extension, and the order is uploaded to the registered person's dashboard. The Section 30(1) extension architecture sits within the broader CGST procedural framework, and the recorded reasons facilitate downstream review if the extension is refused.
The second-proviso extension is sought by filing a fresh application addressed to the Commissioner having jurisdiction, within the cumulative one-twenty-day window. The application chains with the first-proviso order: the chronological narrative now extends from the original cancellation date through the first-proviso event and onward through the second-proviso event. The Commissioner records reasons in writing while granting or refusing the further extension. The cumulative cap stands at one hundred and fifty days computed from the REG-19 service date, beyond which Section 30 cannot be invoked further. The chaining requires careful date-tracking because an application filed on the one-twenty-first day technically falls outside the statutory framework even if the underlying cause genuinely persists.
Where even the second-proviso extension is refused or where the cumulative one-fifty-day cap is exceeded, the boundary with the Section 107 appellate route becomes operationally relevant. The proviso route is exhausted at one hundred and fifty days; thereafter the only statutory remedy is appeal under Section 107(1) within three months of the original cancellation order (or rejection order if applicable). The boundary is conceptually clean: provisos enlarge the Section 30 window, appeal opens a separate merits-review track. Practitioner judgement on when to switch tracks turns on the strength of the merits review: where the underlying cancellation is contestable on speaking-order grounds or on misapplication of Section 29(2), Section 107 is the better track even at the proviso-extension stage rather than after exhaustion.
Strategically the cumulative one-fifty-day window should be planned at the cancellation stage rather than utilised reactively. Practitioners assessing the REG-19 cancellation order against the registered person's books make an early determination on whether the ninety-day base window is sufficient. Where the books are clean and the default period is short, the base window suffices and the provisos are unused. Where the books are disrupted or the default period is long, both proviso extensions are budgeted from day one and the application sequence is initiated proactively. The strategic approach reduces last-minute rushes and aligns documentation discipline with the relevant proviso threshold. Where neither proviso is needed, the registered person is in a stronger procedural posture for the actual REG-21 review.
What Mandaveli clients usually ask next: For Mandaveli engagements specifically — for Mandaveli's premium business segment that values fixed-fee compliance with senior-practitioner involvement.
Reasonable cause is the standard the taxpayer must demonstrate while seeking Commissioner-level extension beyond the initial 90-day window. Illness, lockdown, system failure, audit-induced delay and inability to access portal credentials have been accepted; commercial difficulty or oversight is generally rejected.
GSTIN restoration is the operational effect of a REG-22 revocation order — the cancelled GSTIN is reactivated on the common portal from the date specified in the order, ITC ledgers are unfrozen, and the taxpayer can resume issuing tax invoices and filing returns.
Section 29(2)(c) is the most common cancellation trigger encountered in revocation practice — non-filing of returns by a regular taxpayer for a continuous period of six months. Revocation against this ground requires every defaulted GSTR-3B to be filed with tax, interest and late fee before REG-21 is accepted.
Section 29(2)(b) is the cancellation ground for a voluntary registrant under Section 25(3) who has not commenced business within six months from registration. Revocation requires positive proof of business commencement — invoices, GSTR-1 filings, bank receipts or commercial agreements.
Section 29(2)(e) is the cancellation ground for registrations obtained by fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Revocation in such cases is procedurally available but practically difficult — the taxpayer must demonstrate absence of fraud, and the matter often moves to appellate adjudication under Section 107.
Rule 22(4) drop refers to the dropping of cancellation proceedings by the proper officer in Form REG-20 where the taxpayer files all pending returns during the pendency of the REG-17 show-cause notice. This pre-empts the need for later revocation under Section 30 entirely.
Date of cancellation order is the date of service of Form REG-19 on the registered person, from which the 90-day Section 30 limitation begins to run. Service is effected through the common portal email and registered SMS, and the date is reflected in the portal application status.
Effective date of cancellation is the date from which the cancellation operates substantively — which may be retrospective under the proviso to Section 29(2) in fraud cases. This date determines the period for which returns must be filed before REG-21 can be entertained.
Aggregate dues refers to the consolidated amount of tax, interest under Section 50 and late fee under Section 47 that must be discharged through the Electronic Cash Ledger before REG-21 can be submitted. The portal validates the ECL balance against the dues at submission stage.
Late fee cap is the maximum late fee payable per return under Section 47, ordinarily five thousand rupees per return. Specific revocation amnesty notifications have prescribed lower caps for older period returns — Notification 07/2023-CT capped the late fee for the amnesty window.
Interest on cash component refers to the Section 50 interest computed only on the net cash liability discharged after ITC set-off, pursuant to the retrospective proviso to Section 50(1). For revocation arrears, this is the interest payable on the cash portion of each defaulted GSTR-3B.
Section 16(4) bar is the time limit on ITC availment — no ITC can be claimed in respect of any invoice or debit note after the 30th of November following the relevant financial year. The bar is a critical consideration when filing defaulted GSTR-3B during revocation, as ITC for older periods may already be lost.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Mandaveli businesses typically avoid these: For Mandaveli engagements specifically — the cluster of residential, jewellery, retail businesses that defines Mandaveli's commercial fabric; for Mandaveli's premium business segment that values fixed-fee compliance with senior-practitioner involvement.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Mandaveli, the cluster of residential, jewellery, retail businesses that defines Mandaveli's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Mandaveli engagements look the way they do: For Mandaveli engagements specifically — the cluster of residential, jewellery, retail businesses that defines Mandaveli's commercial fabric; for Mandaveli's premium business segment that values fixed-fee compliance with senior-practitioner involvement.
“Our GSTIN was cancelled suo motu after we missed 8 months of GSTR-3B during a family medical emergency. FilingPro filed all pending returns, computed late fee and interest, and submitted REG-21 within the 90-day window. REG-22 came through in 14 working days. Saved our business from re-registration nightmare.”
“Our cancellation order was 6 months old when we approached FilingPro — well past the 90-day window. They drafted a Commissioner extension request with sufficient cause affidavit and got it allowed. REG-21 then went through. Genuinely impressed with their procedural depth.”
“Received REG-23 SCN after our REG-21 application. FilingPro drafted the reply within the 7-working-day window with supporting documents and case-law citations. The officer passed REG-22 after personal hearing. Strong drafting work.”
“Our case was 14 months past the cancellation order — completely time-barred. FilingPro filed a Madras HC writ petition citing Tvl Suguna Cutpiece (W.P. 25048/2021). The court directed the department to consider revocation. Eventually got REG-22 after filing all pending returns. Litigation-grade work.”
“FilingPro leveraged Notification 03/2023 amnesty for our 2021 cancellation order — would have been impossible otherwise. All pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B filed, late fee discharged, REG-21 went through under amnesty conditions. Excellent timing and knowledge.”
“After REG-22 was passed, FilingPro also handled the buyer-side ITC restoration — coordinated with our customers, ensured invoices flowed to their GSTR-2B and ITC was claimed within Section 16(4) limit. End-to-end revocation handling, not just a form filing.”
Common questions from Mandaveli clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
From Kutchery Road, RA Puram 2nd Main Road, RK Mutt Road, Ramkrishna Mutt Road and Broadie's Castle Road through to Brodie Castle Road, DGS Dhinakaran Road, Durgabai Deshmukh Road and Santhome High Road, our team covers GST Revocation for businesses right across Mandaveli and its main commercial roads.
Professional GST Revocation in Mandaveli, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.