End-to-end GST Refund for Vepery residential commercial mix with media houses establishments — and a zero-penalty filing record
GST Refund for residential commercial mix with media houses businesses across the Vepery pocket near Vepery Police HQ — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 107 provides a first appeal to the Appellate Authority against an RFD-06 rejection within 3 months from the order, condonable up to a further 1 month. Pre-deposit of 10% of disputed tax is required (capped at ₹20 crore CGST + ₹20 crore SGST). Second appeal lies to the GST Appellate Tribunal under Section 112 once it is functional.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Refund in Vepery — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where the refund officer issues a deficiency memo, RFD-03 is replied with a fresh RFD-01 within 15 days under Rule 90(3) — limitation under Section 54(1) preserved, fresh ARN obtained promptly.
For inverted duty refunds in Vepery, Rule 89(5) is applied with the Supreme Court VKC Footsteps ratio — Net ITC restricted to input goods only, excluding input services and capital goods.
Each refund file is tracked till RFD-06 sanction order. Where the 60-day Section 54(7) window is breached, Section 56 interest at 6% (or 9% on appellate orders) is claimed expressly.
9% appellate
For Vepery exporters we evaluate the LUT (RFD-11) route versus IGST-payment route each year — recommending the option that minimises working capital lock and accelerates refund realisation.
Net ITC for Rule 89(4) refund computation is taken only from GSTR-2B-verified invoices. Vepery clients face zero supplier-non-filing-led rejections at the refund officer's scrutiny.
Every GST Refund engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Across Vepery, the cluster of media, healthcare, education businesses that defines Vepery's commercial fabric. Practitioners note that served by short connections to Kilpauk and Periyamet and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Vepery clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Vepery, the business activity radiating outward from St Andrew's Church and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Vepery: Where Vepery differs: for the professional and salaried population of Vepery navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Annual undertaking by an exporter under Rule 96A enabling shipment of goods or supply of services overseas without paying integrated tax — accumulated input tax credit is recovered through RFD-01 under Rule 89(4)
Annexure attached to RFD-01 capturing the Rule 89(5) computation period-wise — turnover of inverted-rated supply, Net ITC restricted to inputs, Adjusted Total Turnover and tax payable on the inverted supply
Annexure to RFD-01 for refund of IGST or accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies — invoice-wise details of exports including shipping bill number, port code, EGM reference, foreign currency value, INR value and tax claimed
First appeal against an RFD-06 order rejecting refund in whole or in part — also used to contest quantum of sanctioned refund where the applicant believes more is due
Primary refund application covering all refund categories under Section 54 — accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies, inverted duty refund, excess cash ledger balance, wrong-head tax under Section 77, deemed exports, finalisation of provisional assessment and others
Legacy manual filing format used during the early GST years before RFD-01 went fully online — retained for transitional and historic claims; current filings use RFD-01
System-generated acknowledgement once the proper officer is satisfied that the application is complete in all respects — starts the sixty-day Section 54(7) sanction clock and the seven-day Rule 91 provisional refund clock
Memo issued by the proper officer where the RFD-01 application is found defective on documentary or computational grounds — the application is treated as not filed and a fresh RFD-01 is required after rectification
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Section 54 is the parent provision governing every refund claim under the GST regime. Sub-section (1) of Section 54 provides that any person seeking refund of tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by him may make an application before the expiry of two years from the relevant date in the prescribed form. It is to be noted that the explanation to the section enumerates eight distinct relevant-date scenarios — exports of goods, supplies to SEZ, services exports, deemed exports, finalisation of provisional assessment, refund consequential on appellate order, payment under mistake, and excess balance in cash ledger.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 54 carves out the only two situations where refund of accumulated unutilised credit is permitted — zero-rated supplies made without payment of tax (the LUT route) and credit accumulation on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than rate of tax on output supplies (inverted duty structure). It is to be noted that the proviso bars refund where the output supply is nil-rated or fully exempt, and a separate proviso excludes export of goods subjected to export duty.
View sourceSub-section (7) of Section 54 prescribes the outer limit for the proper officer to issue the final order — sixty days from the date of receipt of an application complete in all respects. The expiry of this window without an order being issued is the statutory trigger for the interest entitlement under Section 56. It is to be noted that the sixty-day clock runs from the date of acknowledgement in Form RFD-02 and not from the date of original submission of Form RFD-01.
View sourceSection 56 fastens the department with interest liability where the principal refund is not disbursed within sixty days from the receipt of a complete application. The ordinary rate is six per cent per annum from the date of expiry of sixty days till the date of refund. The proviso elevates this to nine per cent per annum where the refund flows from an order of an Appellate Authority, Appellate Tribunal or any Court which has attained finality. It is to be noted that this interest is not auto-credited by the system and must be expressly claimed by the applicant.
View sourceSection 16 of the IGST Act defines zero-rated supply to cover export of goods, export of services, and supply of goods or services to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit. Sub-section (3) of Section 16 grants the registered person two routes to recover the tax incidence — supply under a Letter of Undertaking in Form RFD-11 with subsequent refund of unutilised input tax credit under Rule 89, or supply on payment of integrated tax with refund of IGST under Rule 96. The choice is annual and lies with the exporter.
View sourceRule 89 is the procedural backbone for refund applications other than IGST on exports. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 89 prescribes Form GST RFD-01 as the application form. Sub-rule (2) lists the documentary evidence by category. Sub-rule (4) prescribes the formula for accumulated-credit refund on LUT-route zero-rated supplies. Sub-rule (5) prescribes the inverted-duty refund formula. Sub-rule (1A) deals with Section 77 wrong-head refunds.
View sourceVepery is a mixed residential and commercial pocket north of Egmore with several media houses healthcare facilities and government offices. Statutory correspondence for Vepery businesses routes through the Anna Nagar Division, so we align every GST Refund engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Vepery businesses tie back to the Anna Nagar Division, so our GST Refund cadence accounts for how that office works. Because PIN 600007 sits inside the Chennai North jurisdiction, the handling office for Vepery stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles.
Vepery reads as a residential commercial mix with media houses pocket with medium commercial activity, anchored around Madras Christian College and fed by the Vepery Bus Stop corridor. Working in Vepery brings a logistical edge: proximity to Madras Christian College and the Vepery Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Document pickup near Madras Christian College is a same-hour errand for our Vepery engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Commercial activity in Vepery runs medium, so GST Refund volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Vepery desk accordingly.
For a government business in Vepery, the GST Refund scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. Sector concentration matters: when Vepery leans toward government, the GST Refund risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. GST Refund for government businesses in Vepery hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time. Mixed government activity across Vepery means our GST Refund team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client.
The Vepery GST Refund workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. We keep a repeatable GST Refund checklist for Vepery so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. Every GST Refund file we open for Vepery is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. Our Vepery GST Refund process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.
We treat Vepery and Periyamet as one catchment for GST Refund, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. A client relocating between Vepery and Periyamet keeps the same GST Refund file and the same team. Businesses straddling Vepery and Periyamet get a single GST Refund point of contact rather than two. Group companies spread across Vepery and Periyamet consolidate their GST Refund under one engagement with us.
Over several cycles in Vepery, the recurring GST Refund issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Each engagement in Vepery adds to a record of what the Chennai North jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Refund file. The GST Refund mistakes we see most in Vepery are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Common patterns in the Anna Nagar Division give Vepery businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Refund issues.
Relocating a registered office into Vepery (PIN 600007) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Refund transition cleanly. New government ventures in Vepery lean on us to stand up GST Refund correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. Shifting principal place of business to Vepery means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai North, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. First-time GST Refund for a Vepery business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.
Refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96, accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies under Rule 89 and inverted duty structure refund under Rule 89(5) for Vepery businesses are filed in RFD-01 with Statement-3 within the Section 54(1) 2-year limitation.
A dedicated GST refund consultant in Vepery prepares RFD-01, replies RFD-03 deficiency memos within 15 days, follows up the 60-day RFD-06 sanction, and pursues Section 56 interest where the department delays disbursement.
Exporters in Vepery are advised on the LUT (RFD-11) versus IGST-payment route, Rule 91 provisional refund of 90% within 7 days, and auto-disbursement of IGST refund on shipping bill once GSTR-1 Table 6A and EGM are aligned.
For Vepery manufacturers facing inverted rates, Rule 89(5) refund is computed on Net ITC on inputs (Supreme Court VKC Footsteps ratio applied), Statement-1 prepared period-wise and unjust-enrichment exception under Section 54(8)(b) invoked.
Form RFD-11 is the annual undertaking that allows zero-rated supplies to leave India without an upfront IGST charge. Rule 96A read with CBIC Circular 37/11/2018-GST sets the eligibility — no past prosecution beyond the ₹2.5 crore evasion threshold within five years.
No. The realisation proof — FIRC or BRC from the authorised dealer bank — is a statutory ingredient of Section 2(6) IGST Act. Where part of the invoice value is unrealised at the limitation date, the refund is capped at the realised portion.
INR receipt is generally not treated as convertible foreign exchange for Section 2(6) IGST Act. However Notification 16/2020-CT and the RBI Vostro arrangements extend the convertible foreign exchange concept to specified INR receipts. RBI permission and Vostro credit advice are required.
Rule 96(10) bars refund of IGST paid on exports for taxpayers who have availed inputs under advance authorisation, EOU or other concessional notifications. The accumulated ITC refund route under Rule 89 may still be available subject to eligibility and switching to LUT prospectively.
Maximum Refund = (Turnover of inverted-rated supply x Net ITC) / Adjusted Total Turnover minus the output tax on such inverted-rated supply. Per the VKC Footsteps ratio, Net ITC takes inputs only. Statement-1 captures the run period by period.
The first appeal under Section 107 lies before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) within ninety days, condonable by another thirty, after a ten per cent pre-deposit on the disputed tax quantum. Onward, Section 112 takes the matter to the GST Tribunal once functional.
What Vepery clients want to know before signing: Where Vepery differs: in the residential commercial mix with media houses micro-market of Vepery.
Reading this guide locally — Across Vepery, around the St Andrew's Church catchment of Vepery.
GST refund in India is governed primarily by Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with Sections 55 and 56 and the procedural framework in Rules 89 to 97 of the CGST Rules. Section 54(1) is the operative provision permitting any person to claim refund of any tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by such person by making an application in the prescribed form within two years from the relevant date. The architecture deliberately distinguishes between categories — refund of unutilised input tax credit under Section 54(3) is permitted only in two limbs (zero-rated supplies without payment of tax, and accumulated credit on account of rate inversion), whereas refund of excess balance in the electronic cash ledger flows through a different procedural channel without the two-year horizon. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat timely refund as an integral element of the destination principle in a credit-method consumption tax, and the Indian construct in Section 54 closely mirrors that recommended template. The Vepery registered person engaging with refund must first identify which limb governs the claim before any further procedural step.
Before the rollout of GST in July 2017, refund of indirect taxes was scattered across multiple central and State legislations — Central Excise refund flowed through Section 11B of the Central Excise Act 1944, Service Tax refund through Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 read with Notification 27/2012-Central Excise NT, VAT refund through diverse State VAT statutes, and customs drawback through the All Industry Rates schedule. The Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers in its 2009 First Discussion Paper on GST identified this fragmented refund landscape as a major source of working-capital lockup for exporters and inverted-duty producers, and recommended consolidation into a unified refund regime. Section 54 represents that consolidation. The single national framework allows a manufacturer-exporter to claim refund across the entire input chain in one application, whereas the pre-GST regime would have required separate applications under three or four legislations. The Vepery taxpayer working under Section 54 therefore benefits from a structurally simplified refund pathway compared to the pre-2017 era.
Section 54 read with Rule 89(2) and the explanation to Section 54 recognises several distinct refund categories — IGST paid on export of goods refunded under Rule 96; accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies without payment of tax claimed through Rule 89(4); accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure claimed through Rule 89(5); the surplus carried in the electronic cash ledger; tax mistakenly remitted under the wrong head per Section 77 read alongside Section 19 IGST Act; deemed-export supplies notified through Notification 48/2017-Central Tax; supplies to SEZ developers and units; finalisation of provisional assessment under Section 60; specified embassies and UN agencies under Section 55; and amounts arising from orders of an appellate forum, the tribunal or the courts. Each category embodies a distinct statutory schema with its own eligibility test, document set and procedural cadence. The Vepery entity must first determine its applicable category before designing the refund workflow.
Section 77 read together with Section 19 of the integrated-tax counterpart legislation governs the situation where remittance has occurred under the incorrect head — IGST in place of CGST plus SGST or vice versa — and the wrongly-deposited amount becomes refundable without the Section 54(1) horizon binding the claim. The correct tax is paid first, and the wrongly paid amount is then claimed as refund. Circular 162/18/2021-GST has clarified the procedural framework. The category is related to cash-ledger refund in that both bypass the two-year limitation, though the documentation and rationale differ. The Vepery taxpayer who has paid IGST on intra-State supplies or CGST plus SGST on inter-State supplies should pursue this route promptly to clear the misclassification.
Refund of surplus funds parked in the electronic cash ledger flows through Section 54 read with the explanation, but the two-year limitation under Section 54(1) does not apply since the balance reflects amounts deposited yet not absorbed against any tax, interest, penalty or fee liability — the deposit itself does not constitute tax paid. The application is filed in RFD-01 under the category Excess Balance in Cash Ledger. Documentation is minimal — only the cash-ledger statement extract and bank-account details. The refund is generally sanctioned within the sixty-day Section 54(7) window without unjust-enrichment scrutiny under Section 54(8)(a) since cash-ledger excess is expressly excluded from the unjust-enrichment test. The Vepery applicant with cash-ledger excess should pursue this refund route as the least friction-laden category.
Section 49(10) read with Form PMT-09 permits transfer of balances between heads (IGST, CGST, SGST, cess, interest, late fee, penalty) within the electronic cash ledger. Where the balance is fragmented across heads, PMT-09 consolidation should be performed before any refund application — refund of consolidated excess is procedurally cleaner than head-wise refunds, and avoids partial sanctions that reopen the file for officer queries. PMT-09 itself does not require any approval and flows through immediately on submission. The Vepery applicant identifying cash-ledger excess across multiple heads should sequence PMT-09 first and RFD-01 only after the consolidated balance is visible in the desired head.
Deemed-export refund under Notification 48/2017 differs from zero-rated refund under Section 16 IGST Act in important respects. Zero-rated supplies (exports and SEZ supplies) are not taxable in the first place and the refund covers accumulated ITC. Deemed-export supplies are taxable supplies on which GST is paid, and the refund covers the tax paid itself, not accumulated ITC. The eligibility test, the formula and the documentation differ accordingly. Misapplication of the zero-rated framework to deemed-export cases or vice versa produces refund quanta that the officer must scale down at scrutiny. The Vepery applicant should first determine the correct characterisation before any computation, and document the characterisation working paper in the refund file.
The two-year limitation under Section 54(1) applies to deemed-export refund. The relevant date is the date of return relating to the tax period in which the deemed-export supply was made, as clarified in the explanation to Section 54 read with Notification 49/2017. The limitation runs strictly, and quarterly filing is the recommended cadence. Where the supplier and recipient are coordinating to determine the claimant, time consumed in undertaking-document negotiation must be factored into the limitation calendar. The Vepery applicant should not wait for the full annual cycle before filing, since the deemed-export documentation chain is more elaborate than ordinary domestic refund and remediation cycles can consume the limitation cushion.
Notification 48/2017-Central Tax notifies four categories of supplies as deemed exports — supply of goods by a registered person against advance authorisation, supply of capital goods by a registered person against EPCG authorisation, supply of goods to Export Oriented Units, and supply of gold by a bank or PSU specified in Notification 50/2017-Customs against advance authorisation. The deemed-export framework permits refund of GST paid on such supplies under Section 54 read with Rule 89(2)(g), recognising that the goods are eventually used in physical exports. The policy rationale aligns with the destination principle articulated in the OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines — tax should not embed in supplies that ultimately leave the country. The Vepery supplier servicing advance-authorisation holders, EOUs or EPCG-route importers should consider the deemed-export refund route systematically.
The SEZ specified-officer endorsement on the invoice copy is the critical document evidencing receipt of goods or services for authorised operations of the SEZ unit. The endorsement is a precondition for the SEZ supplier's refund eligibility under Rule 89(4), and absence of the endorsement results in RFD-03 deficiency memos or outright rejection at RFD-06. The endorsement timeline often slips when the SEZ unit's documentation team is overloaded, and proactive coordination is required. The Vepery supplier should obtain the endorsement at the time of each consignment delivery rather than batch-process at quarter-end, and retain the endorsed copy alongside the original invoice in the refund working file.
The SEZ flow is bidirectional and the GST treatment differs. DTA-to-SEZ supplies (a DTA supplier selling into the SEZ) are zero-rated under Section 16 IGST Act with refund routes as described. SEZ-to-DTA supplies (an SEZ unit selling into the DTA) are treated as imports from the SEZ unit's perspective and as inter-State supplies attracting IGST from the DTA buyer's perspective. The two flows have different implications for refund — the DTA supplier in the inbound direction may claim refund, whereas the SEZ unit in the outbound direction discharges output IGST without refund eligibility. The Vepery taxpayer transacting with SEZ entities must correctly identify the direction of flow before any refund analysis.
The CBIC has issued several procedural circulars clarifying SEZ refund mechanics — Circular 17/17/2017-GST, Circular 24/24/2017-GST, Circular 125/44/2019-GST, and Circular 161/17/2021-GST among others. These circulars address topics such as Rule 96(10) restrictions on IGST-route refund where transitional or capital-goods credit was claimed, RFD-01 procedural mechanics, and SEZ-specific documentation requirements. The Vepery SEZ-supplier applicant should track the active circular position rather than rely on outdated guidance, since the SEZ refund framework has evolved considerably since 2017 with each circular building on the preceding clarifications.
What Vepery clients usually ask next: Where Vepery differs: for the professional and salaried population of Vepery navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Fund constituted under Section 57 to which refunds otherwise sanctioned are credited if the applicant fails the unjust-enrichment test. Refunds that survive the test are paid to the applicant; those that fail are deposited to the CWF and not returned to the applicant.
RFD-08 is the show-cause notice issued by the proper officer where the refund application has been found prima facie inadmissible after acknowledgment. The applicant has 15 days to reply in RFD-09 with supporting documents before a rejection order in RFD-06 is passed.
RFD-06 is the final refund sanction or rejection order. Sanction triggers payment advice in RFD-05 to the bank account on the GSTIN record. The order must be passed within 60 days of acknowledgment; failure triggers Section 56 interest liability on the department.
Where a taxpayer has paid CGST plus SGST on a transaction subsequently held to be inter-State, or vice versa, Section 77 of the CGST Act and Section 19 of the IGST Act allow refund of the wrong-head tax without interest demand on the period of wrong payment. The two-year limitation runs from the correct-head payment date per Notification 35/2021-CT.
Relevant Date is the statutorily defined trigger from which the two-year limitation under Section 54(1) begins to run. The Explanation to Section 54 lists eight distinct relevant-date scenarios — for export of goods the trigger is the date the ship leaves India; for service exports the trigger is receipt of payment in convertible foreign exchange or the invoice date (whichever falls later); for inverted-duty claims the trigger is the due date for filing the return covering that tax period.
Net ITC is the input tax credit availed on inputs (and input services for zero-rated supply refunds) during the relevant period, reduced by ineligible credit under Section 17. For inverted-duty refunds under Rule 89(5), following the Supreme Court verdict in the VKC Footsteps matter, Net ITC is restricted to credit on inputs only. It is the numerator that drives the refund formula in both Rule 89(4) and Rule 89(5).
Adjusted Total Turnover is the denominator in the Rule 89(4) and Rule 89(5) formulae. It covers the turnover in a State or Union territory as defined in Section 2(112) minus turnover of services for which refund is claimed and the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies. The formula effectively dilutes the refund where domestic taxable turnover dominates.
Inverted Duty Structure is a scenario where the GST rate on inputs is higher than the GST rate on the output supply, resulting in accumulated unutilised input tax credit that cannot be set off against output liability. Section 54(3)(ii) permits refund of such accumulation. Rule 89(5) prescribes the formula. Common sectors include fabrics, footwear, fertilisers and some pharmaceutical inputs.
Zero-Rated Supply is defined in Section 16 of the IGST Act and covers export of goods, export of services and supply to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit. The supply attracts a nil tax rate but the supplier is entitled to claim refund of taxes paid on inputs and input services — either by exporting under LUT and claiming accumulated ITC refund, or by paying IGST and claiming IGST refund.
LUT Route refers to the export option under Rule 96A whereby the exporter furnishes a Letter of Undertaking in Form RFD-11 and exports goods or services without paying integrated tax. Input tax credit accumulates and is recovered through a Rule 89(4) refund claim filed in RFD-01. The LUT route preserves working capital because no IGST cash outflow occurs at the export stage.
IGST-Payment Route is the export option under Rule 96 whereby the exporter pays integrated tax on the export and the system auto-refunds the IGST once Table 6A of GSTR-1 plus GSTR-3B are filed and the carrier has confirmed the EGM. The shipping bill is itself the refund application. Faster realisation but requires IGST cash outflow at the export stage.
VKC Footsteps Ruling refers to the Supreme Court judgment in Union of India versus VKC Footsteps India Private Limited reported in 2021. The Court upheld Rule 89(5) restricting refund of accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure — only credit on input goods qualifies; input services as well as capital goods stand excluded. The ratio continues to govern every inverted-duty refund computation.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Vepery businesses typically avoid these: Where Vepery differs: the cluster of media, healthcare, education businesses that defines Vepery's commercial fabric. We see for the professional and salaried population of Vepery navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Vepery, the cluster of media, healthcare, education businesses that defines Vepery's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Vepery engagements look the way they do: Where Vepery differs: the cluster of media, healthcare, education businesses that defines Vepery's commercial fabric. We see for the professional and salaried population of Vepery navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“We export auto components from Ambattur and had ₹38 lakh of accumulated ITC stuck for 14 months under the LUT route. FilingPro filed RFD-01 with Statement-3 cleanly tied to our shipping bills and GSTR-1 Table 6A. Provisional 90% sanctioned in 9 days, balance in 47 days. No deficiency memo.”
“Our textile unit faced inverted duty structure for 18 months — output at 5% on fabric, inputs at 12% on yarn. FilingPro applied the Rule 89(5) formula correctly post-VKC Footsteps and recovered ₹22 lakh in cash. Statement-1 was airtight; the officer sanctioned RFD-06 without a single query.”
“Department issued RFD-03 deficiency memo on a technicality — they wanted realised value matched in INR rather than foreign currency on Statement-3. FilingPro filed the corrected RFD-01 within 11 days. Sanction came through in the 60-day window. Limitation was preserved.”
“Refund of ₹6.4 lakh for excess balance in cash ledger — sanctioned by jurisdictional officer in 41 days flat. No unjust-enrichment hassle since this category is exempt under Section 54(8). FilingPro handled documentation, ARN tracking and bank credit advice end-to-end.”
“IGST refund on goods exports was stuck because of GSTR-1 Table 6A vs shipping bill mismatch on port code. FilingPro identified the mismatch, filed amendment in next month's GSTR-1 (Table 9A), and the system auto-disbursed ₹14 lakh under Rule 96 within the next cycle.”
“Our refund was rejected in RFD-06 on grounds of unjust enrichment. FilingPro drafted Section 107 appeal within 80 days, computed 10% pre-deposit correctly, and represented at the First Appellate Authority hearing. Order set aside and refund sanctioned with Section 56 interest at 9%.”
Common questions from Vepery clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Vepery, from Arunachalam Street, Arunachallam Street, Dr Alagappa Road, EVK Sampath Salai and Elephant Gate Bridge Road to the Gandhi - Irwin Road, EVR Periyar Salai, Gangadeeshwar Koil Street and General Hospital Road commercial pockets, with GST Refund handled end to end.
Professional GST Refund in Vepery, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.