Professional GST Refund for Arumbakkam businesses near Arumbakkam Metro — with WhatsApp-first document intake
for the professional and salaried population of Arumbakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
If the supplier of inputs has not filed GSTR-1, the corresponding ITC will not appear in the exporter's GSTR-2B and Rule 89(4) "Net ITC" available for refund will be reduced. The refund officer cross-verifies Statement-3 with GSTR-2B; missing credits are excluded from the sanctioned refund.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Refund in Arumbakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where RFD-06 rejection is wrongful, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months at the First Appellate Authority — APL-01 drafted, 10% pre-deposit computed, hearing represented end-to-end.
For service exports, FIRC and BRC are coordinated with authorised dealer banks before RFD-01 filing — Section 2(6) IGST Act realisation proof complete from day one.
Share your shipping bills, FIRC, GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B on WhatsApp at our number — we handle the rest. Arumbakkam clients work with us entirely remotely from filing to sanction.
Every refund application is filed well within the Section 54(1) 2-year limitation from the relevant date. Arumbakkam clients have zero time-bar rejections on record.
For Arumbakkam exporters under Rule 89, provisional refund of 90% is pursued in RFD-04 within 7 days of acknowledgement — releasing working capital while the balance 10% is processed in detail.
Every Statement-3 invoice line is tied to GSTR-1 Table 6A and shipping bill EGM data. Mismatches are amended via Table 9A in the next GSTR-1 before refund officer scrutiny.
Every GST Refund engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Arumbakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Arumbakkam Metro and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via Arumbakkam Metro and feeder routes connecting Arumbakkam to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Arumbakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Arumbakkam, the cluster of residential, retail, healthcare businesses that defines Arumbakkam's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Arumbakkam: For Arumbakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Arumbakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Payment advice generated post-sanction (provisional or final) routed to PFMS for credit to the applicant's GSTIN-linked bank account
Final adjudicatory order on the refund claim — sanctions the eligible refund in full or in part, or rejects the claim on stated grounds; appealable under Section 107
Part A used for withholding refund under Section 54(10) or 54(11); Part B used to communicate adjustment of sanctioned refund against demand outstanding on the applicant
Show-cause notice issued by the proper officer where the officer proposes to reject the refund claim in whole or in part — the applicant gets an opportunity to file a reply in RFD-09 before the RFD-06 rejection order
Applicant's reply to the RFD-08 show-cause notice carrying defence, supporting case law, documentary clarifications and any supplementary computation
Quarterly refund claim by UIN holders — specialised agencies of the United Nations, multilateral financial institutions, consulates, embassies of foreign countries and notified categories under Section 55
Annual undertaking by an exporter under Rule 96A enabling shipment of goods or supply of services overseas without paying integrated tax — accumulated input tax credit is recovered through RFD-01 under Rule 89(4)
Annexure attached to RFD-01 capturing the Rule 89(5) computation period-wise — turnover of inverted-rated supply, Net ITC restricted to inputs, Adjusted Total Turnover and tax payable on the inverted supply
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Section 54 is the parent provision governing every refund claim under the GST regime. Sub-section (1) of Section 54 provides that any person seeking refund of tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by him may make an application before the expiry of two years from the relevant date in the prescribed form. It is to be noted that the explanation to the section enumerates eight distinct relevant-date scenarios — exports of goods, supplies to SEZ, services exports, deemed exports, finalisation of provisional assessment, refund consequential on appellate order, payment under mistake, and excess balance in cash ledger.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 54 carves out the only two situations where refund of accumulated unutilised credit is permitted — zero-rated supplies made without payment of tax (the LUT route) and credit accumulation on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than rate of tax on output supplies (inverted duty structure). It is to be noted that the proviso bars refund where the output supply is nil-rated or fully exempt, and a separate proviso excludes export of goods subjected to export duty.
View sourceSub-section (7) of Section 54 prescribes the outer limit for the proper officer to issue the final order — sixty days from the date of receipt of an application complete in all respects. The expiry of this window without an order being issued is the statutory trigger for the interest entitlement under Section 56. It is to be noted that the sixty-day clock runs from the date of acknowledgement in Form RFD-02 and not from the date of original submission of Form RFD-01.
View sourceSection 56 fastens the department with interest liability where the principal refund is not disbursed within sixty days from the receipt of a complete application. The ordinary rate is six per cent per annum from the date of expiry of sixty days till the date of refund. The proviso elevates this to nine per cent per annum where the refund flows from an order of an Appellate Authority, Appellate Tribunal or any Court which has attained finality. It is to be noted that this interest is not auto-credited by the system and must be expressly claimed by the applicant.
View sourceSection 16 of the IGST Act defines zero-rated supply to cover export of goods, export of services, and supply of goods or services to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit. Sub-section (3) of Section 16 grants the registered person two routes to recover the tax incidence — supply under a Letter of Undertaking in Form RFD-11 with subsequent refund of unutilised input tax credit under Rule 89, or supply on payment of integrated tax with refund of IGST under Rule 96. The choice is annual and lies with the exporter.
View sourceRule 89 is the procedural backbone for refund applications other than IGST on exports. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 89 prescribes Form GST RFD-01 as the application form. Sub-rule (2) lists the documentary evidence by category. Sub-rule (4) prescribes the formula for accumulated-credit refund on LUT-route zero-rated supplies. Sub-rule (5) prescribes the inverted-duty refund formula. Sub-rule (1A) deals with Section 77 wrong-head refunds.
View sourceBusinesses registered in Arumbakkam share the Chennai North jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Anna Nagar Division each time. Statutory correspondence for Arumbakkam businesses routes through the Anna Nagar Division, so we align every GST Refund engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Arumbakkam (PIN 600106) falls under the Anna Nagar Division of the Chennai North, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Arumbakkam is a north Chennai residential commercial mix anchored by the Arumbakkam Metro and the MMM Hospital with supporting retail and IT services.
Most commerce in Arumbakkam — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Refund working file we maintain for clients here. Working in Arumbakkam brings a logistical edge: proximity to Arumbakkam Metro and the Arumbakkam Metro corridor keeps physical document handling fast. The residential commercial mix mix of Arumbakkam shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of healthcare activity and the commercial pulse around Arumbakkam Metro. Arumbakkam sustains a medium flow of commerce for a residential commercial mix locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Refund files we close here.
The retail character of Arumbakkam commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Refund review needs. A retail operator in Arumbakkam gets a GST Refund workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template. For a retail business in Arumbakkam, the GST Refund scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. Sector concentration matters: when Arumbakkam leans toward retail, the GST Refund risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle.
Document intake for Arumbakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Refund engagement. The qualified-review step on every Arumbakkam GST Refund file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. Turnaround for Arumbakkam GST Refund is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Fixed-fee scoping means a Arumbakkam business knows the GST Refund cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
Proximity to Koyambedu means a Arumbakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. Coverage from Arumbakkam naturally extends to Koyambedu, so group entities across the area share one GST Refund workflow. From the same Arumbakkam team we also serve Koyambedu and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. A client relocating between Arumbakkam and Koyambedu keeps the same GST Refund file and the same team.
The longer we serve Arumbakkam, the more precisely we predict where a GST Refund file needs attention. Common patterns in the Anna Nagar Division give Arumbakkam businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Refund issues. Sector signals in Arumbakkam — seasonal healthcare swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Refund work. Recurring gaps in Arumbakkam healthcare records are the first thing our GST Refund review closes out.
For a new business incorporating in Arumbakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Refund setup is one of the first things to get right. New retail ventures in Arumbakkam lean on us to stand up GST Refund correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. Shifting principal place of business to Arumbakkam means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai North, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. Incorporating in Arumbakkam comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Refund steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch.
Refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96, accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies under Rule 89 and inverted duty structure refund under Rule 89(5) for Arumbakkam businesses are filed in RFD-01 with Statement-3 within the Section 54(1) 2-year limitation.
A dedicated GST refund consultant in Arumbakkam prepares RFD-01, replies RFD-03 deficiency memos within 15 days, follows up the 60-day RFD-06 sanction, and pursues Section 56 interest where the department delays disbursement.
Exporters in Arumbakkam are advised on the LUT (RFD-11) versus IGST-payment route, Rule 91 provisional refund of 90% within 7 days, and auto-disbursement of IGST refund on shipping bill once GSTR-1 Table 6A and EGM are aligned.
For Arumbakkam manufacturers facing inverted rates, Rule 89(5) refund is computed on Net ITC on inputs (Supreme Court VKC Footsteps ratio applied), Statement-1 prepared period-wise and unjust-enrichment exception under Section 54(8)(b) invoked.
Personal hearing is mandatory under Section 75(4) read with Rule 92 where the proposed order is adverse and a hearing has been requested. The Madras HC has applied the principle in Tapas Dutta v UoI to quash orders passed without hearing where one was sought.
Yes, in principle. The Calcutta HC in Suncraft Energy v Asst Commissioner held that ITC cannot be denied to the recipient on supplier-non-filing without first proceeding against the supplier. The Supreme Court SLP dismissal supports the position. Bank payment proof and tax invoice are essential.
CBIC Circular 122/41/2019-GST requires every communication including refund orders to bear a Document Identification Number. The Supreme Court in Pradeep Goyal v UoI affirmed the requirement. Orders without DIN are non-est and can be challenged before the Madras HC under Article 226.
Yes. Article 226 writ before the Madras HC is available on jurisdictional grounds, breach of natural justice or non-compliance with binding precedent. The First Appellate Authority remedy under Section 107 is also concurrently available; the writ route is chosen where alternative remedy is inadequate.
Section 107(6) requires ten per cent of the disputed tax to be paid before the first appeal is admitted. The cap is ₹20 crore CGST plus ₹20 crore SGST. Computation is on disputed tax only, not on tax plus interest plus penalty.
Section 56 interest is statutorily due but the department often does not auto-compute it with the principal refund. The assessee should submit a separate representation citing Section 56, CBIC Circular 125/44/2019-GST and the relevant facts. A supplementary order grants the interest.
What Arumbakkam clients want to know before signing: For Arumbakkam engagements specifically — on the Koyambedu-Aminjikarai corridor that passes through Arumbakkam.
Reading this guide locally — In Arumbakkam, on the Koyambedu-Aminjikarai corridor that passes through Arumbakkam.
GST refund in India is governed primarily by Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with Sections 55 and 56 and the procedural framework in Rules 89 to 97 of the CGST Rules. Section 54(1) is the operative provision permitting any person to claim refund of any tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by such person by making an application in the prescribed form within two years from the relevant date. The architecture deliberately distinguishes between categories — refund of unutilised input tax credit under Section 54(3) is permitted only in two limbs (zero-rated supplies without payment of tax, and accumulated credit on account of rate inversion), whereas refund of excess balance in the electronic cash ledger flows through a different procedural channel without the two-year horizon. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat timely refund as an integral element of the destination principle in a credit-method consumption tax, and the Indian construct in Section 54 closely mirrors that recommended template. The Arumbakkam registered person engaging with refund must first identify which limb governs the claim before any further procedural step.
Before the rollout of GST in July 2017, refund of indirect taxes was scattered across multiple central and State legislations — Central Excise refund flowed through Section 11B of the Central Excise Act 1944, Service Tax refund through Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 read with Notification 27/2012-Central Excise NT, VAT refund through diverse State VAT statutes, and customs drawback through the All Industry Rates schedule. The Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers in its 2009 First Discussion Paper on GST identified this fragmented refund landscape as a major source of working-capital lockup for exporters and inverted-duty producers, and recommended consolidation into a unified refund regime. Section 54 represents that consolidation. The single national framework allows a manufacturer-exporter to claim refund across the entire input chain in one application, whereas the pre-GST regime would have required separate applications under three or four legislations. The Arumbakkam taxpayer working under Section 54 therefore benefits from a structurally simplified refund pathway compared to the pre-2017 era.
Section 54 read with Rule 89(2) and the explanation to Section 54 recognises several distinct refund categories — IGST paid on export of goods refunded under Rule 96; accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies without payment of tax claimed through Rule 89(4); accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure claimed through Rule 89(5); the surplus carried in the electronic cash ledger; tax mistakenly remitted under the wrong head per Section 77 read alongside Section 19 IGST Act; deemed-export supplies notified through Notification 48/2017-Central Tax; supplies to SEZ developers and units; finalisation of provisional assessment under Section 60; specified embassies and UN agencies under Section 55; and amounts arising from orders of an appellate forum, the tribunal or the courts. Each category embodies a distinct statutory schema with its own eligibility test, document set and procedural cadence. The Arumbakkam entity must first determine its applicable category before designing the refund workflow.
Where the appeal succeeds and the refund flows out of the appellate, Tribunal or court order, Section 56 read with its proviso prescribes interest at nine percent per annum, computed from the expiry of sixty days reckoned from the day the consequent application lands with the Department. The nine-percent rate is higher than the six-percent rate applicable to ordinary delayed refunds, recognising the additional time investment by the applicant in pursuing appellate remedy. The interest is not auto-disbursed and must be claimed expressly through correspondence or a separate refund application. The Arumbakkam successful appellant should compute the Section 56 interest from day sixty-one of the appellate-consequent application and pursue the supplementary order through the jurisdictional officer.
Section 107 of the CGST Act provides the first-appeal mechanism against any decision or order passed by an adjudicating authority, including refund rejection orders in Form RFD-06. The appeal must be filed within three months from the date of communication of the order, condonable by a further one month on sufficient cause. Pre-deposit of ten percent of the disputed tax (capped at twenty crore rupees CGST plus twenty crore rupees SGST) is required under Section 107(6). The appeal is filed in Form APL-01 with grounds, prayer and supporting documents. The Arumbakkam applicant whose refund has been rejected wrongfully should evaluate the appeal route promptly to preserve the limitation and consolidate working-capital recovery.
The grounds typically raised in refund appeals include — wrongful application of Section 54(3) eligibility tests, mechanical reduction of Net ITC without supporting analysis, denial on time-bar grounds where deficiency-memo cycles ought to have been factored, denial on supplier-non-compliance grounds notwithstanding Suncraft Energy and similar rulings, mechanical application of Section 54(8) unjust-enrichment without testing the categorical exclusions, and procedural infirmity in the RFD-06 order itself (unreasoned conclusions, no hearing afforded, no consideration of taxpayer submissions). Each ground requires specific factual development and pleading. The Arumbakkam applicant drafting the appeal should align each ground to the specific facts of the RFD-06 order rather than rely on generic templates.
Excess cash-ledger balance can either be refunded under Section 54 or carried forward and offset against future tax liability — the choice is the taxpayer's. The refund route releases working capital immediately but consumes administrative effort. The offset route conserves the balance for future liability but locks the funds with the Department. For taxpayers with steady future output liability the offset route is generally preferable, whereas for taxpayers winding down or with seasonal nil-liability quarters the refund route releases capital productively. The Arumbakkam taxpayer should evaluate both routes against working-capital projections rather than default to refund, recognising the procedural cost of any refund application.
Section 77 read together with Section 19 of the integrated-tax counterpart legislation governs the situation where remittance has occurred under the incorrect head — IGST in place of CGST plus SGST or vice versa — and the wrongly-deposited amount becomes refundable without the Section 54(1) horizon binding the claim. The correct tax is paid first, and the wrongly paid amount is then claimed as refund. Circular 162/18/2021-GST has clarified the procedural framework. The category is related to cash-ledger refund in that both bypass the two-year limitation, though the documentation and rationale differ. The Arumbakkam taxpayer who has paid IGST on intra-State supplies or CGST plus SGST on inter-State supplies should pursue this route promptly to clear the misclassification.
Refund of surplus funds parked in the electronic cash ledger flows through Section 54 read with the explanation, but the two-year limitation under Section 54(1) does not apply since the balance reflects amounts deposited yet not absorbed against any tax, interest, penalty or fee liability — the deposit itself does not constitute tax paid. The application is filed in RFD-01 under the category Excess Balance in Cash Ledger. Documentation is minimal — only the cash-ledger statement extract and bank-account details. The refund is generally sanctioned within the sixty-day Section 54(7) window without unjust-enrichment scrutiny under Section 54(8)(a) since cash-ledger excess is expressly excluded from the unjust-enrichment test. The Arumbakkam applicant with cash-ledger excess should pursue this refund route as the least friction-laden category.
Notification 49/2017-Central Tax operationalises the deemed-export refund procedure. Either the supplier-side or the recipient-side party is entitled to claim the refund, provided the non-claimant furnishes an undertaking that no parallel claim will be pursued on the same supply. The application is filed in RFD-01 under the Deemed Exports category with Statement-5B capturing invoice-wise details. Supporting documentation includes the advance authorisation or EPCG authorisation copy, the recipient's undertaking, the EOU registration document where applicable, and the GSTR-2B reflection. The Arumbakkam applicant should coordinate with the counterparty at the engagement stage to determine which side claims the refund and to obtain the undertaking on letterhead, avoiding last-minute documentation issues at refund-application time.
Deemed-export refund under Notification 48/2017 differs from zero-rated refund under Section 16 IGST Act in important respects. Zero-rated supplies (exports and SEZ supplies) are not taxable in the first place and the refund covers accumulated ITC. Deemed-export supplies are taxable supplies on which GST is paid, and the refund covers the tax paid itself, not accumulated ITC. The eligibility test, the formula and the documentation differ accordingly. Misapplication of the zero-rated framework to deemed-export cases or vice versa produces refund quanta that the officer must scale down at scrutiny. The Arumbakkam applicant should first determine the correct characterisation before any computation, and document the characterisation working paper in the refund file.
The two-year limitation under Section 54(1) applies to deemed-export refund. The relevant date is the date of return relating to the tax period in which the deemed-export supply was made, as clarified in the explanation to Section 54 read with Notification 49/2017. The limitation runs strictly, and quarterly filing is the recommended cadence. Where the supplier and recipient are coordinating to determine the claimant, time consumed in undertaking-document negotiation must be factored into the limitation calendar. The Arumbakkam applicant should not wait for the full annual cycle before filing, since the deemed-export documentation chain is more elaborate than ordinary domestic refund and remediation cycles can consume the limitation cushion.
What Arumbakkam clients usually ask next: For Arumbakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Arumbakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Provisional Refund is the ninety-per-cent advance refund granted under Section 54(6) read with Rule 91 for refund claims arising from zero-rated supplies. It is sanctioned in Form RFD-04 within seven days of acknowledgement and routed through PFMS to the applicant's bank account. The balance ten per cent is settled in the final RFD-06 after detailed scrutiny.
Deficiency Memo is the Form RFD-03 communication issued by the proper officer under Rule 90(3) where the original RFD-01 is found defective on documentary or computational grounds. The original is treated as never having been validly submitted. The applicant must rectify and file a fresh RFD-01. Circular 125/44/2019 limits the department to one such memo per claim.
Sanction Order is the final adjudicatory order in Form RFD-06 passed by the proper officer either sanctioning the refund (in full or in part) or rejecting it. Section 54(7) prescribes a sixty-day window from receipt of complete application. Sanction orders are appealable under Section 107 within three months. Where part-rejection is proposed, RFD-08 SCN precedes the RFD-06 order.
PFMS is the Public Financial Management System of the Office of the Controller General of Accounts — the central platform through which all GST refunds are disbursed. PFMS performs name-match, IFSC validation and account-active checks against the bank account linked to the GSTIN. A PFMS rejection prevents refund credit despite an RFD-06 sanction order being in place.
FIRC is the Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate issued by an authorised dealer bank confirming receipt of foreign exchange against an export of services. It is the realisation proof required under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act for a service export to qualify as zero-rated and to trigger the Section 54 refund entitlement. Banks now issue an electronic FIRC (e-FIRC).
BRC is the Bank Realisation Certificate issued by authorised dealer banks for export of goods, confirming realisation of foreign exchange. Although not always insisted upon at refund stage for goods exports (where shipping bill and EGM suffice), BRC is the gold-standard evidence and is requested where refund quantum is large or where the export-realisation period under FEMA is in question.
Shipping Bill is the customs export document filed at ICEGATE that triggers the IGST refund under Rule 96. Under Rule 96(1) the shipping bill itself is treated as the refund application. The EGM filed by the shipping line confirms physical export and Table 6A of GSTR-1 must mirror the shipping bill data for the system to release the IGST refund.
EGM is the Export General Manifest filed by the shipping line or airline confirming that the cargo has actually left India. Without EGM the IGST refund under Rule 96 does not get auto-triggered. The most frequent cause of stuck IGST refunds in our experience with exporter clients is EGM non-filing or EGM mismatch with the shipping bill.
Statement-3 is the prescribed annexure under Rule 89(2) for accumulated-credit or IGST refund attributable to zero-rated transactions. It captures line-level export details — invoice number, invoice date, port code, the shipping bill number with its date, EGM reference, foreign currency value, rupee value and the IGST or ITC claimed. Refund officers cross-verify it against GSTR-1 Table 6A and GSTR-2B.
Statement-1 is the annexure under Rule 89(5) for refund of accumulated input tax credit on account of inverted duty structure. It captures the period-wise computation of the Rule 89(5) formula — the four inputs being turnover of the lower-rated output supply, Net ITC, Adjusted Total Turnover, and tax payable on that same output. The refund quantum equals the formula output.
Table 6A is the section of GSTR-1 capturing exports of goods on payment of IGST and exports under LUT. The data here is the trigger for the system-driven IGST refund under Rule 96. Any mismatch between Table 6A and the shipping bill on invoice value, GSTIN or shipping bill number will stall the auto-refund. Table 9A of the next GSTR-1 is used to rectify mismatches.
Section 56 Interest is the statutory interest payable by the department where the principal refund is not disbursed within sixty days of receipt of the complete application. The ordinary rate is six per cent per annum; the proviso elevates it to nine per cent where the refund flows from an appellate order. The clock runs from day sixty-one till the actual date of refund.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Arumbakkam businesses typically avoid these: For Arumbakkam engagements specifically — the business activity radiating outward from Arumbakkam Metro and nearby commercial pockets; for the professional and salaried population of Arumbakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Arumbakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Arumbakkam Metro and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Arumbakkam engagements look the way they do: For Arumbakkam engagements specifically — the business activity radiating outward from Arumbakkam Metro and nearby commercial pockets; for the professional and salaried population of Arumbakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“We export auto components from Ambattur and had ₹38 lakh of accumulated ITC stuck for 14 months under the LUT route. FilingPro filed RFD-01 with Statement-3 cleanly tied to our shipping bills and GSTR-1 Table 6A. Provisional 90% sanctioned in 9 days, balance in 47 days. No deficiency memo.”
“Our textile unit faced inverted duty structure for 18 months — output at 5% on fabric, inputs at 12% on yarn. FilingPro applied the Rule 89(5) formula correctly post-VKC Footsteps and recovered ₹22 lakh in cash. Statement-1 was airtight; the officer sanctioned RFD-06 without a single query.”
“Department issued RFD-03 deficiency memo on a technicality — they wanted realised value matched in INR rather than foreign currency on Statement-3. FilingPro filed the corrected RFD-01 within 11 days. Sanction came through in the 60-day window. Limitation was preserved.”
“Refund of ₹6.4 lakh for excess balance in cash ledger — sanctioned by jurisdictional officer in 41 days flat. No unjust-enrichment hassle since this category is exempt under Section 54(8). FilingPro handled documentation, ARN tracking and bank credit advice end-to-end.”
“IGST refund on goods exports was stuck because of GSTR-1 Table 6A vs shipping bill mismatch on port code. FilingPro identified the mismatch, filed amendment in next month's GSTR-1 (Table 9A), and the system auto-disbursed ₹14 lakh under Rule 96 within the next cycle.”
“Our refund was rejected in RFD-06 on grounds of unjust enrichment. FilingPro drafted Section 107 appeal within 80 days, computed 10% pre-deposit correctly, and represented at the First Appellate Authority hearing. Order set aside and refund sanctioned with Section 56 interest at 9%.”
Common questions from Arumbakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Across Arumbakkam we look after firms on Anna Arch Road, Anna Nagar Bridge, Kaliamman Koil Street, 4th Avenue (Santhi Colony Road) and 5th Avenue as well as the 6th Main Road, 7th Main Road, EVR Periyar Salai and Jawaharlal Nehru Road (100 Feet Road) corridors — local GST Refund without the cross-city travel.
Professional GST Refund in Arumbakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.