End-to-end GST Audit Support for Vyasarpadi dense residential and small trade pocket establishments — backed by a 15+ year track record
Handling GST Audit Support for Vyasarpadi and Perambur clients with WhatsApp document intake and same-day filed-acknowledgement delivery. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 65 audit can be undertaken for any financial year or part thereof. There is no fixed lookback in the section itself, but Section 35(3) mandates record retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — so the practical lookback is 5 to 6 financial years. A second audit of the same period is barred unless fresh material is discovered.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Vyasarpadi — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where findings are accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 with reference to the audit ARN gets ADT-04 closure issued — no DRC-01 SCN under Section 73 or 74, no penalty escalation.
Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).
All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.
Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.
Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Vyasarpadi client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Vyasarpadi businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Vyasarpadi Junction and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Vyasarpadi Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Vyasarpadi to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Vyasarpadi clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Vyasarpadi businesses operate where the cluster of small trade, residential, auto components businesses that defines Vyasarpadi's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Vyasarpadi: Closer to Vyasarpadi, for the professional and salaried population of Vyasarpadi navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit
Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 66 provides that the expenses of the examination and audit, including the remuneration of the nominee auditor, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination shall be final. It is to be noted that the registered person does not bear the cost of the special audit even though the audit is conducted on records furnished by him.
View sourceSub-section (5) of Section 35, as it stood prior to amendment by the Finance Act 2021, required every registered person whose turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold to get his accounts audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant and submit a copy of the audited annual accounts, the reconciliation statement and other documents in the prescribed form. The Finance Act 2021 omitted this sub-section with effect from 1 August 2021. It is to be noted that the GSTR-9C reconciliation statement is now a self-certified document under Rule 80.
View sourceSub-section (5) of Section 66 mandates that the registered person shall be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on the basis of special audit which is proposed to be used in any proceedings against him under the Act. It is to be noted that this is a codified expression of the audi alteram partem principle and any adjudication relying on special-audit material without this opportunity is procedurally infirm.
View sourceBusinesses registered in Vyasarpadi share the Chennai North jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Perambur Division each time. Statutory correspondence for Vyasarpadi businesses routes through the Perambur Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Vyasarpadi businesses tie back to the Perambur Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. Every Vyasarpadi engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600039, the Perambur Division, and the coordinates 13.1106, 80.2522 that anchor the locality.
Vendors and customers tied to the Vyasarpadi Bus Stop network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Vyasarpadi GST Audit Support clients. Freight and foot traffic from the Vyasarpadi Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Vyasarpadi, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this dense residential and small trade pocket pocket. Each GST Audit Support cycle for Vyasarpadi reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Erukkanchery Junction, expenses routed through the Vyasarpadi Bus Stop freight network. Commercial activity in Vyasarpadi runs medium, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Vyasarpadi desk accordingly.
For a residential business in Vyasarpadi, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. A residential operator in Vyasarpadi gets a GST Audit Support workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template. The business mix in Vyasarpadi centres on residential, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for residential firms near Vyasarpadi to know where the department usually probes.
Document intake for Vyasarpadi clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. We keep a repeatable GST Audit Support checklist for Vyasarpadi so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. Working papers for Vyasarpadi GST Audit Support engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. Our Vyasarpadi GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.
From the same Vyasarpadi team we also serve Perambur and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Serving Vyasarpadi and Perambur from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. GST Audit Support clients in Perambur are handled by the same practitioners who run our Vyasarpadi desk. We treat Vyasarpadi and Perambur as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent.
Patterns we track for Vyasarpadi include auto components documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Perambur Division tends to raise. Over several cycles in Vyasarpadi, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Recurring gaps in Vyasarpadi auto components records are the first thing our GST Audit Support review closes out. Because we work repeatedly across Vyasarpadi, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm.
Shifting principal place of business to Vyasarpadi means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai North, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. A startup setting up near Vyasarpadi Junction in Vyasarpadi gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Perambur Division from day one. First-time GST Audit Support for a Vyasarpadi business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. We onboard new Vyasarpadi entities onto a GST Audit Support cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Vyasarpadi businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Vyasarpadi prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Vyasarpadi businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
A second Section 65 audit of the same period is generally not undertaken absent fresh material. However, special audit under Section 66 may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted, and other proceedings under the Act remain available where conditions are met.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 allows the officer to elect between an on-premises audit and an office-of-the-officer audit. For most {{area_name}} taxpayers the on-site route is preferred so that books, statutory registers and electronic backups can be inspected together.
The audit unit is each GSTIN; assessment and book-keeping are GSTIN-specific even where the underlying PAN is common. The Tamil Nadu registration of a pan-India taxpayer is audited independently by the jurisdictional CGST or SGST authority covering that GSTIN.
ADT-02 is the audit-findings report under Rule 101(5) at the end of a Section 65 audit. DRC-01 is the show-cause notice issued under Section 73 or 74 read with Rule 142 to demand tax. ADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into a DRC-01 SCN separately.
DRC-03 is the voluntary-payment intimation under Rule 142(2). It is used to discharge tax with interest before SCN to invoke Section 73(5) or 74(5) immunity, or to comply with ADT-02 findings. Closure follows through DRC-04 or DRC-05 as the case may be.
Section 73(5) permits payment of tax with interest before any show-cause notice is issued. Where so paid through DRC-03 referencing the audit ARN, no penalty is leviable and proceedings stand closed for that amount on issue of DRC-04 by the proper officer.
What Vyasarpadi clients want to know before signing: Closer to Vyasarpadi, on the Perambur-Otteri corridor that passes through Vyasarpadi.
Reading this guide locally — Vyasarpadi businesses operate where on the Perambur-Otteri corridor that passes through Vyasarpadi.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Section 75(5) provides that the proper officer shall, if sufficient cause is shown by the person chargeable with tax, grant time to that person and adjourn the hearing for reasons to be recorded in writing; provided that no such adjournment shall be granted for more than three times to a person during the proceedings. The three-adjournment cap is a calibration between procedural fairness and proceeding-efficiency. In practice, registered persons facing complex audit findings should plan their adjournment requests strategically — use the first adjournment to gather documents, the second for representation-counsel engagement, and reserve the third for final consolidation. Beyond three adjournments, the proper officer is empowered to proceed ex-parte under Section 75(5) and pass the order on best-judgement basis.
Section 75(6) provides that the proper officer, in his order, shall set out the relevant facts and the basis of his decision. The reasoned-order requirement is a substantive procedural right that traces to the Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on natural-justice-derived reasoned orders. Pradeep Goyal v UoI (Supreme Court on DIN — document identification number for all CBIC communications) supplements this by requiring procedural identifiability of the order. The registered person facing an order that does not engage with the response, does not cite the relevant provisions, or merely reproduces the SCN allegations, has strong grounds for either Section 107 first-appeal challenge or Article 226 writ challenge.
Section 75(11) provides that an issue on which the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court has given its decision which is prejudicial to the interest of revenue in some other proceedings, and an appeal to the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court or Supreme Court against such decision is pending, the period of stay shall be excluded in computing the limitation period. The provision permits the revenue to preserve its position pending appeal; the corresponding taxpayer protection is the principle that the proper officer is bound by appellate decisions on the same issue unless distinguished. Where the registered person can cite a binding precedent on the same issue from the Madras High Court or AAR Tamil Nadu, the proper officer is obliged to apply it.
The simplest post-audit option, where the registered person broadly accepts the ADT-02 findings, is voluntary closure through DRC-03 payment under Section 73(5). DRC-03 is filed online through the GST portal; the registered person specifies the tax, interest and (where applicable) penalty quantum and the period to which the payment relates. Section 73(6) bars subsequent SCN on the amount paid. The Form DRC-04 acknowledgement is the conclusive evidence of voluntary closure. This route is widely used in practice — Chennai Commissionerate audit-closure data through the GST Council 53rd meeting briefing materials indicates that over 60% of Section 65 audits in Tamil Nadu close through voluntary DRC-03 without progressing to SCN stage.
Where one or more ADT-02 findings are disputed, the registered person prepares for the SCN under Section 73 or Section 74. The SCN response should be filed within thirty days of receipt of DRC-01; extensions are available under Section 73(8) or 74(8). The response should address each allegation with: (i) the factual position; (ii) the legal position with cited provisions and circulars; (iii) cited case law (Goetze, Bharti Airtel, Suncraft Energy, Aap and Co, GKN Driveshafts, Kranti Associates, Pradeep Goyal, Tapas Dutta — only where load-bearing); (iv) the quantum-mitigation argument (Section 73 versus Section 74 framing, limitation, computational errors). The personal-hearing under Section 75(4) is the consolidation step. The DRC-07 order then issues; first appeal under Section 107 follows for adverse outcomes.
Where the ADT-02 findings, the SCN under Section 73/74, or the DRC-07 adjudication order suffers from jurisdictional infirmity — absence of Commissioner approval for Section 66 special audit, breach of Section 65(4) audit-completion timeline, denial of Section 75(4) opportunity of hearing, absence of Section 75(6) reasoned order, absence of DIN under Pradeep Goyal, breach of natural justice under audi alteram partem — the registered person can file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) line of authority offers guidance on writ entertainability in tax matters. The writ remedy is extraordinary and reserved for jurisdictional questions, not for merit-based challenges which belong in the statutory appellate hierarchy.
Section 65(5) empowers the audit team to verify the documents, ascertain the correctness of turnover declared, exemptions and deductions claimed, rate of tax applied, ITC availed and utilised, refund claimed, and other relevant compliance matters. The team can examine any of these dimensions and require any explanation. Section 65(6) imposes a corresponding obligation on the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account, statements and other documents called for, and to furnish information and render assistance for the timely completion of the audit. Reasonable cooperation is the registered person's first-line defence — obstruction or non-cooperation can trigger Section 71 access provisions and escalate the matter into Section 67 inspection territory.
Section 65(1) of the CGST Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, at such frequency and in such manner as may be prescribed. Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules read with Section 65(3) requires that the registered person be given not less than fifteen working days prior notice of audit through Form GST ADT-01. The ADT-01 intimation specifies the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year, occasionally a longer span) and the documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, declarations, returns, GSTR-9C reconciliation statement, internal-audit reports if any. The fifteen-day window is the registered person's opportunity to gather records and seek extension on documented grounds; Rule 101(3) implicitly contemplates such extensions where genuinely warranted.
Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.
What Vyasarpadi clients usually ask next: Closer to Vyasarpadi, for the professional and salaried population of Vyasarpadi navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Pre-ADT-02 window is the practical window between draft observation by the audit officer and issuance of formal ADT-02, during which the registered person can file a written reply, produce additional records and make voluntary DRC-03 payments under Section 73(5) to avoid penalty exposure.
Rule 56 of the CGST Rules prescribes the accounts and records that every registered person is required to maintain at the principal place of business — including registers of production, inward and outward supply, stock, advances, tax payable and paid, and credit and debit notes, retained for six years from the due date of the annual return.
Six-year retention is the statutory obligation under Section 36 read with Rule 56(18) to keep books of account and other records until expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing of the annual return for the year pertaining to such accounts and records, extended where the registered person is party to any appeal or proceeding.
Records walkthrough is the practitioner-led structured presentation of statutory registers, reconciliations and working notes to the audit officer at the commencement of audit, designed to substitute an unstructured document-request cycle and reduce overall audit duration.
Adverse finding is an observation in the audit officer's draft note or in the formal ADT-02 alleging short-payment of tax, excess availment of input tax credit, wrong claim of refund or other contravention, carrying with it a subsequent demand under Section 73 or Section 74 if the tax with interest is not voluntarily paid.
Voluntary DRC-03 is a payment of tax with interest made by the registered person on his own ascertainment under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5), filed in Form DRC-03 on the common portal, with the procedural advantage that no penalty under Section 73(9) or reduced penalty under Section 74(5) applies if the payment is made before issuance of notice.
Table 8 reconciliation is the working file built between the auto-populated GSTR-2A or 2B based ITC in Table 8A of GSTR-9 and the ITC availed and reported by the registered person in Table 8B and 8C, with the residual variance disclosed in Table 8D and an explanation parked in Table 8E or 8F.
Audit-readiness pack is the practitioner-prepared bundle delivered to the audit officer at commencement, typically containing turnover reconciliation, ITC reconciliation, RCM register, blocked credit working under Section 17(5), and a self-identified list of likely adverse findings with cure positions.
Block credit register is the internal ledger maintained by the registered person under good-practice (not statutorily prescribed) listing every input tax credit availed and separately the credits blocked under Section 17(5) categories such as motor vehicles, food and beverages, club memberships and personal consumption, with rationale.
RCM register is the internal ledger that tracks every transaction on which tax is payable under reverse charge by the recipient under Section 9(3) or 9(4) read with Notification 13/2017-CT, capturing GTA freight, legal fees, director sitting fees, security services, sponsorship and unregistered supplier purchases above thresholds.
Audit observation cure is the corrective workflow undertaken by the practitioner between the draft observation by the audit officer and issuance of formal ADT-02, by which a substantive demand position is reduced or eliminated through written submission, additional records, judicial precedent application and where appropriate voluntary DRC-03 payment.
Audit closure meeting is the final sitting between the registered person and the audit officer where the contents of the draft ADT-02 are walked through, accepted positions are confirmed for voluntary payment and contested positions are flagged for the formal reply track, ahead of the officer signing and issuing ADT-02.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Vyasarpadi businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Vyasarpadi, the business activity radiating outward from Vyasarpadi Junction and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for the professional and salaried population of Vyasarpadi navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Vyasarpadi businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Vyasarpadi Junction and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Vyasarpadi engagements look the way they do: Closer to Vyasarpadi, the cluster of small trade, residential, auto components businesses that defines Vyasarpadi's commercial fabric, which is why for the professional and salaried population of Vyasarpadi navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Vyasarpadi clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Across Vyasarpadi we look after firms on MKB Nagar West Avenue, Melpatti Ponappa Street, Paper Mills Road, Cooks Road and Erukkancheri High Road as well as the Madhavaram High Road, Moorthinagar Street, Muthu Street and Perambur High Road corridors — local GST Audit Support without the cross-city travel.
Professional GST Audit Support in Vyasarpadi, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.