End-to-end GST Audit Support for Rajakilpakkam residential pocket establishments — on fixed, transparent fees
Handling GST Audit Support for Rajakilpakkam and Sembakkam clients — qualified review, a 7-year workpaper archive and fixed fees from day one. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 65 audit is conducted at the principal place of business as registered in REG-06. If the audit covers transactions of branches (additional places of business), the records of those branches must be produced at the principal place or made accessible to the audit team. {{area_name}} businesses with branches outside Tamil Nadu must coordinate branch records to the audit venue.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Rajakilpakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.
Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.
Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Rajakilpakkam client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Rajakilpakkam, the cluster of residential, retail, restaurants businesses that defines Rajakilpakkam's commercial fabric; served by short connections to Sembakkam and Madambakkam and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Rajakilpakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Rajakilpakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Rajakilpakkam Bus Stop and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Rajakilpakkam: For Rajakilpakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Rajakilpakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 35 obliges every registered person to keep and maintain, at his principal place of business, a true and correct account of production or manufacture of goods, inward and outward supply of goods or services, stock of goods, input tax credit availed, output tax payable and paid, and such other particulars as may be prescribed. It is to be noted that the records framework under this section is the substratum on which any audit, scrutiny or adjudication proceeds.
View sourceSub-section (5) of Section 65 obliges the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account or other documents as may be required, and to furnish such information as may be required and render assistance for timely completion of the audit. It is to be noted that non-cooperation under this sub-section can lead the proper officer to invoke best-judgment assessment under Section 62 or escalate to special audit under Section 66.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 66 provides that the expenses of the examination and audit, including the remuneration of the nominee auditor, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination shall be final. It is to be noted that the registered person does not bear the cost of the special audit even though the audit is conducted on records furnished by him.
View sourceRajakilpakkam is a residential pocket between Sembakkam and Madambakkam with neighbourhood retail and restaurants. The 600xx geo-zone covering Rajakilpakkam groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable. Because PIN 600073 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for Rajakilpakkam stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Every Rajakilpakkam engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600073, the Tambaram Division, and the coordinates 12.9111, 80.1581 that anchor the locality.
The businesses clustered around Rajakilpakkam Bus Stop in Rajakilpakkam drive the bulk of the GST Audit Support workload we see each cycle. Vendors and customers tied to the Rajakilpakkam Bus Stop network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Rajakilpakkam GST Audit Support clients. Working in Rajakilpakkam brings a logistical edge: proximity to Rajakilpakkam Bus Stop and the Rajakilpakkam Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Commercial activity in Rajakilpakkam runs medium, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Rajakilpakkam desk accordingly.
For a restaurants business in Rajakilpakkam, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. Because Rajakilpakkam hosts a cluster of restaurants businesses, we benchmark each new GST Audit Support engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. The restaurants firms we serve in Rajakilpakkam value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. The business mix in Rajakilpakkam centres on restaurants, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance.
A Rajakilpakkam client sees the same GST Audit Support cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. The qualified-review step on every Rajakilpakkam GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. Turnaround for Rajakilpakkam GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Document intake for Rajakilpakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement.
GST Audit Support clients in Madambakkam are handled by the same practitioners who run our Rajakilpakkam desk. Businesses straddling Rajakilpakkam and Madambakkam get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. Proximity to Madambakkam means a Rajakilpakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. Coverage from Rajakilpakkam naturally extends to Madambakkam, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow.
Over several cycles in Rajakilpakkam, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Each engagement in Rajakilpakkam adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Rajakilpakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Sector signals in Rajakilpakkam — seasonal retail swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Audit Support work.
Relocating a registered office into Rajakilpakkam (PIN 600073) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Audit Support transition cleanly. New restaurants ventures in Rajakilpakkam lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. For a new business incorporating in Rajakilpakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. First-time GST Audit Support for a Rajakilpakkam business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Rajakilpakkam businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Rajakilpakkam prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Rajakilpakkam businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Under Section 66(5) the Commissioner determines and discharges the remuneration of the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. The registered person carries no fee burden for the special-audit professional, although internal representation costs remain to the taxpayer's account.
Yes. Beginning the 2020-21 financial year, taxpayers crossing the five-crore aggregate-turnover mark in any year self-certify the reconciliation statement. Earlier external certification by a Chartered Accountant was dispensed with by the Finance Act 2021 amendments to Section 44.
The threshold is aggregate turnover above five crore rupees in the financial year, applied PAN-wise across all GSTINs. Persons below this threshold are not required to file GSTR-9C even where GSTR-9 filing is otherwise compulsory for them.
GSTR-9 along with GSTR-9C where applicable is due by the thirty-first of December following the relevant financial year. Section 44 read with Rule 80 governs the due date, subject to periodic extensions notified by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.
Section 35 with Rule 56 obliges the registered person to keep the universe of tax invoices, stock and production registers, ITC workings, output liability schedules, RCM register, e-way bill logs, IRN files, Section 17(5) computations and matched bank statements ready for production.
Section 36 fixes the horizon at six years measured from the GSTR-9 due date for that year. Where any appeal, revision or proceeding remains pending, retention runs until one year after final disposal or six years, whichever event is later in time.
What Rajakilpakkam clients want to know before signing: For Rajakilpakkam engagements specifically — on the Sembakkam-Madambakkam corridor that passes through Rajakilpakkam.
Reading this guide locally — In Rajakilpakkam, on the Sembakkam-Madambakkam corridor that passes through Rajakilpakkam.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Audit under Section 65 or 66 is conceptually distinct from assessment under Sections 61 (scrutiny of returns) and 62 (best-judgement assessment of non-filers) and from inspection / search / seizure under Section 67. Scrutiny under Section 61 is a desk-review of returns by the proper officer who issues ASMT-10 on discrepancies; the registered person responds in ASMT-11; closure or escalation follows. Audit is broader — Section 65(5) permits examination of the books, returns, statements, declarations and other documents to verify correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and ITC availed, plus assessment of compliance with the Act. Inspection under Section 67 is targeted enforcement upon reason-to-believe of tax evasion and is invasive — premises access, seizure of records and goods. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration's compliance-pyramid model recommends graduated escalation from desk review to field audit to inspection, and the Indian framework broadly mirrors that design.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
For high-stake audits (multi-year audits, Section 66 special audit nominations, audits of multi-State enterprises), a mock audit by an independent reviewer — typically a former tax-department officer or a senior Chartered Accountant with audit-defence experience — is a useful preparation step. The mock auditor replicates the audit-team's risk-engine-driven interrogation, identifies weak documentary positions, and recommends remedial steps. The cost of mock audits is justified where the potential audit exposure (tax plus interest plus penalty) materially exceeds the mock-audit fee. Comparative income-tax practice has long used mock-audits for high-stake Section 143(3) scrutiny assessments and Section 142(2A) special audits; the GST extension of this practice is recent but growing.
Upon receipt of Form ADT-01, the registered person's first task in the fifteen-day window is structured document marshalling. The recommended sequence is: (i) compile the full year's GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A / 2B downloads; (ii) compile GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C with the underlying reconciliation working papers; (iii) compile sales register, purchase register and stock register from the accounting system; (iv) compile bank statements and cash-book extracts; (v) compile e-way bill summaries; (vi) compile reverse-charge self-invoice register under Section 31(3)(f); (vii) compile Rule 42 / 43 ITC apportionment working papers; (viii) compile statutory audit and tax audit reports for the corresponding financial year. This structured marshalling enables the audit team to verify systematically and shortens the audit cycle materially.
Before the audit-team's arrival, the registered person should conduct an internal reconciliation walkthrough — replicating the audit-team's likely interrogation map. The walkthrough should cover: GSTR-1 outward supply versus books turnover; GSTR-3B Table 3.1 versus GSTR-1 invoice-summary; GSTR-3B Table 4(A) ITC claimed versus GSTR-2A / 2B vendor uploads; GSTR-9 Tables 4 to 8 versus GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B aggregates; GSTR-9C Tables 5, 7, 9, 12 to 14 versus audited financial statements. Any variance identified at the walkthrough is an opportunity for voluntary DRC-03 payment before the audit-team formalises it; voluntary disclosure during the walkthrough phase typically attracts no penalty under Section 73(5) read with Section 73(6).
Section 75(6) provides that the proper officer, in his order, shall set out the relevant facts and the basis of his decision. The reasoned-order requirement is a substantive procedural right that traces to the Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on natural-justice-derived reasoned orders. Pradeep Goyal v UoI (Supreme Court on DIN — document identification number for all CBIC communications) supplements this by requiring procedural identifiability of the order. The registered person facing an order that does not engage with the response, does not cite the relevant provisions, or merely reproduces the SCN allegations, has strong grounds for either Section 107 first-appeal challenge or Article 226 writ challenge.
Section 75(11) provides that an issue on which the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court has given its decision which is prejudicial to the interest of revenue in some other proceedings, and an appeal to the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court or Supreme Court against such decision is pending, the period of stay shall be excluded in computing the limitation period. The provision permits the revenue to preserve its position pending appeal; the corresponding taxpayer protection is the principle that the proper officer is bound by appellate decisions on the same issue unless distinguished. Where the registered person can cite a binding precedent on the same issue from the Madras High Court or AAR Tamil Nadu, the proper officer is obliged to apply it.
Section 75(4) of the CGST Act provides that an opportunity of being heard shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person. The opportunity is a substantive procedural right derived from the principles of natural justice and the constitutional audi alteram partem principle. The GKN Driveshafts (India) v ITO Supreme Court principle on the pre-decisional opportunity is applied in the GST context with full force. The proper officer's failure to grant the opportunity, or grant in a perfunctory manner, vitiates the order and provides grounds for writ relief under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court.
Where one or more ADT-02 findings are disputed, the registered person prepares for the SCN under Section 73 or Section 74. The SCN response should be filed within thirty days of receipt of DRC-01; extensions are available under Section 73(8) or 74(8). The response should address each allegation with: (i) the factual position; (ii) the legal position with cited provisions and circulars; (iii) cited case law (Goetze, Bharti Airtel, Suncraft Energy, Aap and Co, GKN Driveshafts, Kranti Associates, Pradeep Goyal, Tapas Dutta — only where load-bearing); (iv) the quantum-mitigation argument (Section 73 versus Section 74 framing, limitation, computational errors). The personal-hearing under Section 75(4) is the consolidation step. The DRC-07 order then issues; first appeal under Section 107 follows for adverse outcomes.
Where the ADT-02 findings, the SCN under Section 73/74, or the DRC-07 adjudication order suffers from jurisdictional infirmity — absence of Commissioner approval for Section 66 special audit, breach of Section 65(4) audit-completion timeline, denial of Section 75(4) opportunity of hearing, absence of Section 75(6) reasoned order, absence of DIN under Pradeep Goyal, breach of natural justice under audi alteram partem — the registered person can file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) line of authority offers guidance on writ entertainability in tax matters. The writ remedy is extraordinary and reserved for jurisdictional questions, not for merit-based challenges which belong in the statutory appellate hierarchy.
Section 84 of the CGST Act provides for the continuance and validation of certain recovery proceedings; it does not provide a formal settlement scheme akin to the income-tax Settlement Commission framework which existed pre Finance Act 2021. However, the GST Council has periodically recommended amnesty schemes for specific compliance categories — Notification 03/2023-CT and the surrounding family of notifications on late-fee waiver, the GSTR-9 late-fee amnesty, the registration-revocation amnesty under Notification 03/2023-CT, and the periodic Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme equivalent for legacy excise / service tax cases. The registered person facing an adverse audit closure should monitor GST Council recommendations (47th Chandigarh, 50th, 53rd and subsequent meetings) for amnesty windows that may offer settlement at reduced penalty quantum. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration recognises amnesty-and-voluntary-disclosure programmes as compliance-architecture tools.
What Rajakilpakkam clients usually ask next: For Rajakilpakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Rajakilpakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Section 36 of the CGST Act is the records-retention provision. Every registered person required to maintain accounts under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the financial year pertaining to the records. Pending appeal or revision extends the retention period.
Section 67 of the CGST Act is the inspection, search and seizure provision. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, where he has reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit has been wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise inspection of places of business. Section 67 is a distinct enforcement track and is not the same as the audit jurisdiction under Section 65.
Section 73 of the CGST Act governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed for reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Order under sub-section (10) may be passed within three years from the due date of annual return; SCN at least three months prior.
Section 74 of the CGST Act governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. The limitation extends to five years from the due date of the annual return. Penalty equal to the tax demanded is leviable.
Rule 101 of the CGST Rules prescribes the procedure for audit under Section 65. Sub-rule (1) provides that the audit period shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) deals with discrepancy notes and sub-rule (5) prescribes Form ADT-02 for communication of findings.
Rule 102 of the CGST Rules prescribes the procedure for special audit under Section 66. Sub-rule (1) prescribes Form ADT-03 for the direction to the registered person, and sub-rule (2) prescribes Form ADT-04 for communication of the findings of the special audit to the registered person.
Place of audit is governed by sub-section (2) of Section 65 which permits the audit to be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. The choice rests with the department; the registered person does not have a unilateral right to require off-site audit.
Date of commencement of audit is defined in the Explanation to sub-section (4) of Section 65. It is the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. The ninety-day completion clock runs from this date.
Conclusion of audit is the point at which the field-verification and records-examination work under Section 65 is finished. The thirty-day clock for issuance of ADT-02 under sub-section (6) of Section 65 starts running from conclusion. Conclusion is distinct from the date of communication of findings.
Period of audit under sub-rule (1) of Rule 101 shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. A multi-year audit is permissible where the audit notice in ADT-01 specifies the periods covered. The earliest period audited typically corresponds to records retention horizon under Section 36.
Audit notes are the contemporaneous record maintained by the proper officer during the conduct of audit under Rule 101. Discrepancies recorded in the audit notes are communicated to the registered person under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 with an opportunity to reply before the findings are crystallised in ADT-02.
Discrepancy memo is the informal communication, contemplated under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101, by which the proper officer informs the registered person of observations recorded during audit. The registered person files a written reply with supporting reconciliations before ADT-02 is issued.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Rajakilpakkam businesses typically avoid these: For Rajakilpakkam engagements specifically — the cluster of residential, retail, restaurants businesses that defines Rajakilpakkam's commercial fabric; for the professional and salaried population of Rajakilpakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Rajakilpakkam, the cluster of residential, retail, restaurants businesses that defines Rajakilpakkam's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Rajakilpakkam engagements look the way they do: For Rajakilpakkam engagements specifically — the cluster of residential, retail, restaurants businesses that defines Rajakilpakkam's commercial fabric; for the professional and salaried population of Rajakilpakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Rajakilpakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Rajakilpakkam, from 3rd Cross Street, 3rd Main Road, 4th Street, Abdul Kalam Street and Annai Theresa Street to the Balaji Nagar Main Road APN Nagar Main Road, Madambakkam Road, Santhosapuram - Vengaivasal - Mambakkam Road and 1st Cross Street commercial pockets, with GST Audit Support handled end to end.
Professional GST Audit Support in Rajakilpakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.