GST Audit Support delivery for traditional retail and hardware firms across Purasaiwakkam — with a documented, audit-ready process
for Purasaiwakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.
Generally no. Once a Section 65 audit has been completed for a period and ADT-04 has been issued, that period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Special audit under Section 66 is a distinct power and may be invoked separately if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed Section 65 audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Purasaiwakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).
All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.
Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.
Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Purasaiwakkam client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Purasaiwakkam businesses operate where the cluster of traditional retail, hardware, jewellery businesses that defines Purasaiwakkam's commercial fabric, and served by short connections to Kilpauk and Chetpet and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Purasaiwakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Purasaiwakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Purasaiwakkam High Road and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Purasaiwakkam: Where Purasaiwakkam differs: for Purasaiwakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Forms most asked about here — Purasaiwakkam businesses operate where where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Pre-show-cause-notice intimation by the proper officer of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; carries Part A with officer's quantification and Part B for registered person's reply
Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Statutory hooks that bite here — Purasaiwakkam businesses operate where where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSection 74 governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. The limitation is extended to five years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Penalty equal to the tax demanded is leviable. It is to be noted that the higher penalty regime under this provision requires the proper officer to specifically allege and establish one of the three jurisdictional triggers.
View sourceSub-section (4) of Section 65 prescribes that the audit shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of the audit. The proviso permits the Commissioner, where satisfied that the audit cannot be completed within three months for reasons to be recorded in writing, to extend the period by a further period not exceeding six months. The expression date of commencement is defined in the Explanation to mean the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later.
View sourceSub-section (7) of Section 65 provides that where the audit results in detection of tax not paid or short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised, the proper officer may initiate action under Section 73 or Section 74. It is to be noted that this sub-section is the statutory bridge between the audit conclusion and adjudication proceedings.
View sourceWhich of these bite hardest in Purasaiwakkam: Where Purasaiwakkam differs: where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Statutory correspondence for Purasaiwakkam businesses routes through the Anna Nagar Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. We keep a cycle-by-cycle record of how the Anna Nagar Division of the Chennai North handles Purasaiwakkam filings and approvals. Purasaiwakkam is a settled north-central residential and traditional-retail district along Purasaiwakkam High Road, with hardware shops, jewellery, traditional textile retail and a dense small-business base. GST clients are typically traditional retailers, hardware vendors and restaurants. The 600xx geo-zone covering Purasaiwakkam groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Purasaiwakkam reads as a traditional retail and residential pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around Purasaiwakkam High Road and fed by the Purasaiwakkam Bus Stop corridor. Most commerce in Purasaiwakkam — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Audit Support working file we maintain for clients here. Document pickup near Purasaiwakkam High Road is a same-hour errand for our Purasaiwakkam engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Commercial activity in Purasaiwakkam runs high, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Purasaiwakkam desk accordingly.
The hardware firms we serve in Purasaiwakkam value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. For a hardware business in Purasaiwakkam, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. Sector concentration matters: when Purasaiwakkam leans toward hardware, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. A hardware operator in Purasaiwakkam gets a GST Audit Support workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template.
We keep a repeatable GST Audit Support checklist for Purasaiwakkam so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. Our Purasaiwakkam GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. Turnaround for Purasaiwakkam GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Document intake for Purasaiwakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement.
Serving Purasaiwakkam and Chetpet from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. Proximity to Chetpet means a Purasaiwakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. Businesses straddling Purasaiwakkam and Chetpet get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. From the same Purasaiwakkam team we also serve Chetpet and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients.
Sector signals in Purasaiwakkam — seasonal hardware swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Audit Support work. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Purasaiwakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. The longer we serve Purasaiwakkam, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Recurring gaps in Purasaiwakkam hardware records are the first thing our GST Audit Support review closes out.
Incorporating in Purasaiwakkam comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. New residential ventures in Purasaiwakkam lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. For a new business incorporating in Purasaiwakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. When a Aminjikarai business expands into Purasaiwakkam, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600007 without disruption.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Purasaiwakkam businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Purasaiwakkam prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Purasaiwakkam businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Yes. Section 116 permits an authorised representative including a Chartered Accountant, Cost Accountant or advocate to represent the registered person. Representation is widely used in {{area_name}} for ADT-01 audits and Section 66 special-audit coordination to ensure procedural rigour.
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the proper officer at the registered person's place. Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner directing a Commissioner-nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to conduct the examination on specified grounds.
Rule 101(2) prescribes a minimum buffer of fifteen working days from service of ADT-01 to the date when audit work actually starts. The buffer is used to organise records, reconcile returns and brief the authorised representative.
Form ADT-01 is the audit-commencement notice issued by the proper officer under Rule 101(2) read with Section 65(3) of the CGST Act 2017. It precedes the audit and triggers the fifteen-working-day record-preparation window for the registered person.
Issued under Rule 101(5), Form ADT-02 documents the proper officer's conclusions on alleged short paid tax, ineligible credit and consequential interest. The instrument is a finding only; any monetary demand thereafter is crystallised through DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74.
Form ADT-03 is the order issued under Section 66(1) directing a Commissioner-nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to conduct a special audit. It is an order, not a notice, and the nominated professional then conducts the audit on the department's behalf.
What Purasaiwakkam clients want to know before signing: Where Purasaiwakkam differs: in the traditional retail and residential micro-market of Purasaiwakkam. We see where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Localised for Purasaiwakkam, Chennai — where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Reading this guide locally — Purasaiwakkam businesses operate where on the Kilpauk-Chetpet corridor that passes through Purasaiwakkam.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Audit under Section 65 or 66 is conceptually distinct from assessment under Sections 61 (scrutiny of returns) and 62 (best-judgement assessment of non-filers) and from inspection / search / seizure under Section 67. Scrutiny under Section 61 is a desk-review of returns by the proper officer who issues ASMT-10 on discrepancies; the registered person responds in ASMT-11; closure or escalation follows. Audit is broader — Section 65(5) permits examination of the books, returns, statements, declarations and other documents to verify correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and ITC availed, plus assessment of compliance with the Act. Inspection under Section 67 is targeted enforcement upon reason-to-believe of tax evasion and is invasive — premises access, seizure of records and goods. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration's compliance-pyramid model recommends graduated escalation from desk review to field audit to inspection, and the Indian framework broadly mirrors that design.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
ADT-01 intimations are not randomly issued; selection is driven by the GSTN risk engine combined with CBIC Audit Manual sectoral profiles. The risk engine factors include sharp variances between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Table 4(A), between GSTR-9 and audited financial statements (via GSTR-9C), unusually high refund claims, sector-specific red flags (e.g. inverted-duty sectors, real-estate developers under Notification 03/2019-CT(R)), and prior-audit findings. The risk-based architecture aligns with the GST Council 47th and 53rd meeting recommendations on focusing enforcement on high-risk taxpayer cohorts while reducing nuisance audits of compliant small taxpayers. Knowing one's risk-profile drivers helps the registered person anticipate audit topics and prepare working papers accordingly.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit-initiation intimation prescribed under Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules 2017. The form is generated by the proper officer (or audit officer authorised by the Commissioner) and served on the registered person at least fifteen working days before the date proposed for commencement of audit. ADT-01 contains the GSTIN and legal name of the registered person, the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year), the place where audit will be conducted (place of business or office of the proper officer), the date of audit commencement, and a schedule of documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, returns including GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, declarations, internal-audit reports, agreements material to the tax position, and any other document the audit team specifies. The fifteen-day window is a statutory taxpayer right under Section 65(3) read with Rule 101(2).
Upon receipt of ADT-01, the registered person's first task is to map the document-schedule against actual maintained records and identify any gaps. Where records are incomplete (typically Rule 56 stock registers, Rule 89 refund working papers, or reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f)), the fifteen-day window is the opportunity for reconstruction. The Goetze (India) v CIT (2006) Supreme Court principle on the inability to make fresh claims outside the return framework (decided in the income-tax context) is sometimes invoked at the audit stage to deny ITC claims not appearing in original returns; the counter-position rests on Section 16(4) timeline arguments and the principle that audit is a verification not a re-assessment. Document submission within the fifteen-day window aligns the formal commencement of audit under Section 65(4) Explanation and tightens the three-month closure clock.
Section 73(5) of the CGST Act allows the registered person to pay the tax along with interest under Section 50 on the basis of own ascertainment or as ascertained by the proper officer and inform the proper officer of such payment in Form DRC-03 before service of an SCN under Section 73(1). Where the registered person agrees with the ADT-02 findings, voluntary payment under Section 73(5) avoids the SCN cycle entirely and limits the financial impact to tax plus interest, without penalty. Section 73(6) then mandates that no SCN shall be issued in respect of the amount paid. This voluntary-payment route is the preferred audit-closure mechanism for genuine ITC errors, classification mis-applications and minor valuation gaps, and is widely used in practice.
Where the registered person disagrees with one or more ADT-02 findings, the response options are: (a) file a Section 75 representation seeking re-consideration before the SCN stage; (b) await the SCN under Section 73 or 74 and contest at that stage; (c) where the audit findings are perceived as jurisdictionally infirm, file a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ remedy is typically reserved for jurisdictional infirmities — absence of Commissioner approval under Section 66, breach of the Section 65(4) timeline, denial of Section 75 opportunity of hearing — rather than for merit-based challenges. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) lines of authority offer guidance on writ-jurisdictional questions in audit and assessment matters.
Form GST ADT-02 is the audit-closure report prescribed under Rule 101(5) of the CGST Rules and Section 65(7) of the CGST Act. Upon completion of the audit, the proper officer is required to issue ADT-02 within thirty days informing the registered person of the findings, the rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. ADT-02 captures the period audited, the audit observations under each verification head (turnover, ITC, refund, classification, rate, valuation), the proper officer's conclusion on each observation, the tax / interest / penalty quantum where applicable, and the rights of the registered person to dispute or accept the findings. The form is the formal closure of the audit cycle and the trigger for the next-stage decision — voluntary DRC-03 payment, SCN under Section 73 or 74, or no-action closure.
The Commissioner determines the remuneration of the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant under Section 66(4) based on rates broadly aligned with the ICAI and ICMAI minimum recommended scales for special-audit work. The registered person typically has no direct say in either the selection of the CA/CMA or the remuneration determination — both are administrative decisions of the Commissioner. Challenges to ADT-03 cost-recovery are rare in practice and usually focus on the underlying Section 66 nomination itself rather than the quantum. Where the Section 66 nomination was procedurally infirm (no Commissioner approval, no opportunity of being heard, no recorded reasons), the consequential ADT-03 cost-recovery similarly becomes vulnerable in writ proceedings. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents this cost-recovery pattern as common across jurisdictions that use specialist-audit tiers.
Once ADT-03 is served, the cost-recovery amount becomes payable within the timeline specified in the form (typically thirty days). Non-payment triggers Section 79 of the CGST Act — the Government dues recovery framework — which empowers the proper officer to recover the amount through modes including deduction from any amount due to the registered person, sale of any movable or immovable property, attachment of bank accounts under Section 83 provisional attachment, and recovery as land revenue arrears. The registered person can apply for instalment-payment under Section 80 read with Rule 158 where genuine financial hardship exists; the Commissioner has discretion to allow up to twenty-four monthly instalments subject to interest under Section 50.
In practice, ADT-03 cost-recovery determinations issued by Tamil Nadu Commissionerates have ranged from modest amounts (₹50,000-₹2 lakh for limited-scope special audits) to substantial amounts (₹10 lakh and above for multi-year complex audits involving multiple GSTINs). The pattern correlates with the audit-scope — broad valuation or ITC-eligibility audits at large multi-State entities typically yield higher cost-recovery quantums. Registered persons under Section 66 nomination are well-advised to engage with the CA/CMA on a documented scope-limitation memorandum to control the quantum; reasonableness of the determination is reviewable in writ jurisdiction though the threshold for interference is high.
What Purasaiwakkam clients usually ask next: Where Purasaiwakkam differs: where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile. We see for Purasaiwakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Terms you will hear in this area — Purasaiwakkam businesses operate where where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Date of commencement of audit is defined in the Explanation to sub-section (4) of Section 65. It is the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. The ninety-day completion clock runs from this date.
Conclusion of audit is the point at which the field-verification and records-examination work under Section 65 is finished. The thirty-day clock for issuance of ADT-02 under sub-section (6) of Section 65 starts running from conclusion. Conclusion is distinct from the date of communication of findings.
Period of audit under sub-rule (1) of Rule 101 shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. A multi-year audit is permissible where the audit notice in ADT-01 specifies the periods covered. The earliest period audited typically corresponds to records retention horizon under Section 36.
Audit notes are the contemporaneous record maintained by the proper officer during the conduct of audit under Rule 101. Discrepancies recorded in the audit notes are communicated to the registered person under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 with an opportunity to reply before the findings are crystallised in ADT-02.
Discrepancy memo is the informal communication, contemplated under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101, by which the proper officer informs the registered person of observations recorded during audit. The registered person files a written reply with supporting reconciliations before ADT-02 is issued.
Books of account refer to the records required to be maintained under sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the CGST Act — accounts of production or manufacture, inward and outward supply, stock, ITC availed, output tax payable and paid. Maintenance at the principal place of business is the default; additional places require records of the additional location.
Records retention under Section 36 is the obligation to preserve books of account and other records until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the financial year. Where appeal or revision is pending, retention extends until one year after final disposal of the proceeding.
Self-certification under Rule 80(3) is the framework that, with effect from 1 August 2021, replaced mandatory audit by a chartered accountant or cost accountant for GSTR-9C. The registered person self-certifies the reconciliation statement; the substantive content of GSTR-9C continues to be governed by the form.
Reconciliation statement is the document filed in Form GSTR-9C reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles the tax payable as per the financial statement with the tax declared in the annual return and the input tax credit availed with the credit reflected in books.
DRC-01A is the pre-show-cause-notice intimation prescribed under sub-rule (1A) of Rule 142. Part A is the officer's quantification of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; Part B is the registered person's reply or acceptance. DRC-01A is the principal off-ramp before formal proceedings under Section 73 or 74.
DRC-03 is the voluntary-payment intimation prescribed under sub-rule (2) and (3) of Rule 142. It is filed where the registered person makes voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or 74(5). DRC-03 is the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal adjudication.
Section 73(5) deposit is the voluntary payment made by the registered person, on his own ascertainment or on ascertainment by the proper officer, before issuance of a show-cause notice. The deposit, when made along with applicable interest under Section 50, results in no penalty being leviable under Section 73(9).
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Purasaiwakkam businesses typically avoid these: Where Purasaiwakkam differs: the cluster of traditional retail, hardware, jewellery businesses that defines Purasaiwakkam's commercial fabric. We see for Purasaiwakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Purasaiwakkam businesses operate where where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile, and the cluster of traditional retail, hardware, jewellery businesses that defines Purasaiwakkam's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
A flavour of cases we handle nearby — Purasaiwakkam businesses operate where where traditional retail businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Why these Purasaiwakkam engagements look the way they do: Where Purasaiwakkam differs: the cluster of traditional retail, hardware, jewellery businesses that defines Purasaiwakkam's commercial fabric. We see for Purasaiwakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Purasaiwakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Purasaiwakkam, from Gandhi Irwin Road, Gengu Reddy Road, Barnaby Road, Brick Klin Road and EVR Periyar Salai to the Gangadeeshwar Koil Street, Millers Road, Purasawalkam High Road and Raja Annamalai Road commercial pockets, with GST Audit Support handled end to end.
Professional GST Audit Support in Purasaiwakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.