the business activity radiating outward from Palavakkam Beach and nearby commercial pockets — with WhatsApp-first document intake
GST Audit Support for coastal residential mid tier businesses across the Palavakkam pocket near ECR Road — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.
Yes. GST audit is GSTIN-wise — each registration has its own books, returns and assessment. A Tamil Nadu GSTIN of a multi-state business is audited separately from its Karnataka or Telangana GSTIN by the respective state's CGST or SGST authority. Records must therefore be maintained GSTIN-wise even where the underlying ERP is consolidated.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Palavakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Palavakkam client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
For Palavakkam businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Across Palavakkam, the cluster of residential, restaurants, hospitality businesses that defines Palavakkam's commercial fabric. Practitioners note that served by short connections to Neelankarai and Kottivakkam and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Palavakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Palavakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Palavakkam Beach and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Palavakkam: Closer to Palavakkam, for the professional and salaried population of Palavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66; carries the nominee auditor's observations and the officer's view
Consolidated annual return capturing outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands/refunds; the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored
Self-certified reconciliation between the value of supplies declared in the annual return and the audited annual financial statement, along with reconciliation of tax paid and ITC
Pre-show-cause-notice intimation by the proper officer of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; carries Part A with officer's quantification and Part B for registered person's reply
Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 65 provides that the registered person shall be informed by way of a notice not less than fifteen working days prior to the conduct of audit. The notice is issued in Form GST ADT-01 as prescribed under Rule 101(2). It is to be noted that the fifteen-working-day window is a substantive procedural safeguard; commencement of audit proceedings without compliance with this timeline is a jurisdictional infirmity that may be agitated under Article 226.
View sourceSub-section (7) of Section 65 provides that where the audit results in detection of tax not paid or short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised, the proper officer may initiate action under Section 73 or Section 74. It is to be noted that this sub-section is the statutory bridge between the audit conclusion and adjudication proceedings.
View sourceSection 36 directs every registered person required to keep and maintain books of account or other records under sub-section (1) of Section 35 to retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the year pertaining to such accounts and records. It is to be noted that where the records pertain to a matter that is the subject of an appeal, revision or any other proceeding, retention is required until one year after final disposal.
View sourceRecords we prepare for Palavakkam carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 12.9567, 80.2589, which map each submission back to this locality. Statutory correspondence for Palavakkam businesses routes through the Velachery Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Every Palavakkam engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600041, the Velachery Division, and the coordinates 12.9567, 80.2589 that anchor the locality. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Palavakkam businesses tie back to the Velachery Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works.
Palavakkam reads as a coastal residential mid tier pocket with medium commercial activity, anchored around Palavakkam Beach and fed by the Palavakkam Bus Stop corridor. Each GST Audit Support cycle for Palavakkam reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Palavakkam Beach, expenses routed through the Palavakkam Bus Stop freight network. Document pickup near Palavakkam Beach is a same-hour errand for our Palavakkam engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. The businesses clustered around Palavakkam Beach in Palavakkam drive the bulk of the GST Audit Support workload we see each cycle.
A residential operator in Palavakkam gets a GST Audit Support workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template. The residential firms we serve in Palavakkam value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. residential units around Palavakkam share recurring GST Audit Support patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. For a residential business in Palavakkam, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts.
The Palavakkam GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Our Palavakkam GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. A Palavakkam client sees the same GST Audit Support cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. The qualified-review step on every Palavakkam GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal.
Serving Palavakkam and Thiruvanmiyur from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. From the same Palavakkam team we also serve Thiruvanmiyur and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Businesses straddling Palavakkam and Thiruvanmiyur get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. We treat Palavakkam and Thiruvanmiyur as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent.
Over several cycles in Palavakkam, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Each engagement in Palavakkam adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. Sector signals in Palavakkam — seasonal retail swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Audit Support work. Recurring gaps in Palavakkam retail records are the first thing our GST Audit Support review closes out.
When a Kottivakkam business expands into Palavakkam, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600041 without disruption. New residential ventures in Palavakkam lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. First-time GST Audit Support for a Palavakkam business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. Incorporating in Palavakkam comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Palavakkam businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Palavakkam prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Palavakkam businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Non-production attracts best-judgement reconstruction by the proper officer, Section 125 general penalty up to twenty-five thousand rupees, and adverse inference under the Indian Evidence Act principles. Section 70 summons may also be issued requiring personal attendance with records.
An Article 226 writ before the Madras High Court is maintainable against an ADT-01 notice where the notice lacks jurisdictional foundation, overlaps with an earlier audit on the same period without fresh material, or violates the speaking-order discipline recognised in Kranti Associates and GKN Driveshafts.
ADT-02 records the audit conclusions. If the taxpayer does not voluntarily discharge through Form DRC-03, demand is crystallised by way of a show-cause notice in Form DRC-01 invoking Section 73 or 74 as the case may be, and eventually a DRC-07 adjudication order.
Yes. The CBIC Single Interface for Facilitation by Tax Authorities framework coordinates Central and State audits to avoid duplication on the same GSTIN-period. The audit by one authority generally bars audit by the other for the same period absent fresh material.
Yes. Section 116 permits an authorised representative including a Chartered Accountant, Cost Accountant or advocate to represent the registered person. Representation is widely used in {{area_name}} for ADT-01 audits and Section 66 special-audit coordination to ensure procedural rigour.
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the proper officer at the registered person's place. Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner directing a Commissioner-nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to conduct the examination on specified grounds.
What Palavakkam clients want to know before signing: Closer to Palavakkam, on the Neelankarai-Kottivakkam corridor that passes through Palavakkam.
Reading this guide locally — Across Palavakkam, around the Palavakkam Beach catchment of Palavakkam.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Once the Section 66(1) opinion is formed and Commissioner's approval obtained, Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit a report duly signed and certified, in such form as prescribed (Form ADT-04), within ninety days; this period can be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the CA/CMA, with the Commissioner's permission. Section 66(3) requires that the registered person be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on the basis of the special audit and proposed to be used in any proceeding against him. Section 66(4) clarifies that the expenses of the examination and audit, including remuneration of the CA/CMA, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner. Section 66(5) preserves the proper officer's power to take further proceedings (SCN under Section 73 / 74) on the basis of the special audit findings.
Section 66(6) is a critical safeguard from the revenue's perspective — it provides that nothing in Section 66 shall be construed to debar the registered person from filing returns or paying tax, or to debar the proper officer from taking any action against the registered person under any other provision. The provision is non-derogating; a Section 66 special audit can be invoked even after a Section 65 departmental audit has been completed, where the proper officer forms a fresh opinion on value or credit complexity. Comparative jurisprudence in pre-GST excise (similar provision in Section 14A of the Central Excise Act before its omission) and service tax (Section 72A of the Finance Act 1994) had similar non-derogation features. The registered person's defence at the Section 66 stage rests primarily on the Section 75 opportunity-of-being-heard and the nature-of-complexity threshold.
The income-tax framework has a parallel under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 — special audit can be directed where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the nature and complexity of the accounts, the volume of accounts, doubts about the correctness of the accounts, multiplicity of transactions in the accounts or specialised nature of business activity, is of the opinion that it is necessary in the interests of revenue. Pre-GST excise had Section 14A; service tax had Section 72A. The architectural unity across these provisions is that special audit is a complexity-triggered intervention requiring a substantive opinion plus a procedural safeguard. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents a similar 'specialist audit' tier in several mature tax jurisdictions, reserved for complex high-revenue cases.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit-initiation intimation prescribed under Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules 2017. The form is generated by the proper officer (or audit officer authorised by the Commissioner) and served on the registered person at least fifteen working days before the date proposed for commencement of audit. ADT-01 contains the GSTIN and legal name of the registered person, the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year), the place where audit will be conducted (place of business or office of the proper officer), the date of audit commencement, and a schedule of documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, returns including GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, declarations, internal-audit reports, agreements material to the tax position, and any other document the audit team specifies. The fifteen-day window is a statutory taxpayer right under Section 65(3) read with Rule 101(2).
Upon receipt of ADT-01, the registered person's first task is to map the document-schedule against actual maintained records and identify any gaps. Where records are incomplete (typically Rule 56 stock registers, Rule 89 refund working papers, or reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f)), the fifteen-day window is the opportunity for reconstruction. The Goetze (India) v CIT (2006) Supreme Court principle on the inability to make fresh claims outside the return framework (decided in the income-tax context) is sometimes invoked at the audit stage to deny ITC claims not appearing in original returns; the counter-position rests on Section 16(4) timeline arguments and the principle that audit is a verification not a re-assessment. Document submission within the fifteen-day window aligns the formal commencement of audit under Section 65(4) Explanation and tightens the three-month closure clock.
Where genuine grounds exist — pending statutory audit of financial statements, key personnel unavailability, or recent migration of accounting systems — the registered person can seek extension of the audit commencement date by written representation. The audit team has administrative discretion under Rule 101 to grant reasonable extensions, generally up to thirty additional days; longer extensions require Commissioner-level approval. The extension must be sought before the proposed commencement date and supported by documentary evidence (statutory auditor engagement letter, employee leave records, ERP migration plans). The OECD Forum on Tax Administration best-practice benchmarks recognise such extensions as a taxpayer-rights safeguard, balanced against the audit-closure timeline.
Where the registered person disagrees with one or more ADT-02 findings, the response options are: (a) file a Section 75 representation seeking re-consideration before the SCN stage; (b) await the SCN under Section 73 or 74 and contest at that stage; (c) where the audit findings are perceived as jurisdictionally infirm, file a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ remedy is typically reserved for jurisdictional infirmities — absence of Commissioner approval under Section 66, breach of the Section 65(4) timeline, denial of Section 75 opportunity of hearing — rather than for merit-based challenges. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) lines of authority offer guidance on writ-jurisdictional questions in audit and assessment matters.
Form GST ADT-02 is the audit-closure report prescribed under Rule 101(5) of the CGST Rules and Section 65(7) of the CGST Act. Upon completion of the audit, the proper officer is required to issue ADT-02 within thirty days informing the registered person of the findings, the rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. ADT-02 captures the period audited, the audit observations under each verification head (turnover, ITC, refund, classification, rate, valuation), the proper officer's conclusion on each observation, the tax / interest / penalty quantum where applicable, and the rights of the registered person to dispute or accept the findings. The form is the formal closure of the audit cycle and the trigger for the next-stage decision — voluntary DRC-03 payment, SCN under Section 73 or 74, or no-action closure.
ADT-02 audit observations are structured around the verification heads — turnover under Section 9 read with Section 7, taxable value under Section 15, rate of tax under the rate notifications, ITC under Sections 16 to 21, refund under Sections 54 and 55, and miscellaneous compliance. Each observation typically includes the audit team's working, the discrepancy quantum, the section / rule under which the proposed addition is framed, and the proper officer's reasoning. The Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on reasoned orders applies — the proper officer's reasoning must engage with the registered person's explanations and cannot be a mechanical reproduction of audit-team working. Where reasoning is absent or perfunctory, the registered person has stronger grounds in subsequent Section 73 / 74 proceedings or in a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226.
What Palavakkam clients usually ask next: Closer to Palavakkam, for the professional and salaried population of Palavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Place of supply is determined under Chapter V of the IGST Act and dictates whether a supply is intra-State (CGST plus SGST) or inter-State (IGST). Audit observations on place of supply typically address services supplied to recipients in other States, goods movements without invoicing and exports without LUT.
Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the GST department under Section 65 of the CGST Act covering a registered person for one or more financial years, commenced by ADT-01 and concluded by ADT-02, usually completed at the registered place of business or office of the proper officer.
Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 by the Commissioner where the proper officer is of the opinion that the value or credit availed has not been correctly declared; it is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner and triggered by Form ADT-03.
ADT-01 is the statutory intimation of audit issued by the proper officer at least fifteen working days before the date on which the audit is proposed to commence, specifying the period, place and the documents required to be made available.
ADT-02 is the form in which the proper officer communicates the audit findings, rights and obligations to the registered person within thirty days of completion of the audit; observations in ADT-02 typically feed into a subsequent Section 73 or Section 74 demand notice if tax has not been voluntarily paid.
ADT-03 is the direction issued under Section 66(1) by the Commissioner to a registered person requiring submission to special audit by a nominated chartered or cost accountant; the audit report is to be submitted within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause.
Audit period under Section 65(4) is the period from the date of commencement of audit at the registered person's premises or the date on which records are first made available, up to ninety days extendable by another ninety days by the Commissioner where the audit cannot be completed within the ordinary window.
Pre-ADT-02 window is the practical window between draft observation by the audit officer and issuance of formal ADT-02, during which the registered person can file a written reply, produce additional records and make voluntary DRC-03 payments under Section 73(5) to avoid penalty exposure.
Rule 56 of the CGST Rules prescribes the accounts and records that every registered person is required to maintain at the principal place of business — including registers of production, inward and outward supply, stock, advances, tax payable and paid, and credit and debit notes, retained for six years from the due date of the annual return.
Six-year retention is the statutory obligation under Section 36 read with Rule 56(18) to keep books of account and other records until expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing of the annual return for the year pertaining to such accounts and records, extended where the registered person is party to any appeal or proceeding.
Records walkthrough is the practitioner-led structured presentation of statutory registers, reconciliations and working notes to the audit officer at the commencement of audit, designed to substitute an unstructured document-request cycle and reduce overall audit duration.
Adverse finding is an observation in the audit officer's draft note or in the formal ADT-02 alleging short-payment of tax, excess availment of input tax credit, wrong claim of refund or other contravention, carrying with it a subsequent demand under Section 73 or Section 74 if the tax with interest is not voluntarily paid.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Palavakkam businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Palavakkam, the cluster of residential, restaurants, hospitality businesses that defines Palavakkam's commercial fabric, which is why for the professional and salaried population of Palavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Palavakkam, the cluster of residential, restaurants, hospitality businesses that defines Palavakkam's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Palavakkam engagements look the way they do: Closer to Palavakkam, the cluster of residential, restaurants, hospitality businesses that defines Palavakkam's commercial fabric, which is why for the professional and salaried population of Palavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Palavakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
From 17th Street, 18th Street, 1st Cross street, 1st Main Road and East Coast Road through to Pandian Salai, Estate 1st Cross street, Estate 1st Main Road and Estate Main road, our team covers GST Audit Support for businesses right across Palavakkam and its main commercial roads.
Professional GST Audit Support in Palavakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.