End-to-end GST Audit Support for Chromepet education it residential corridor establishments — and a zero-penalty filing record
GST Audit Support for Chromepet firms under Chennai South (Tambaram Division) by qualified experts with a 15+ year, zero-penalty record. Call 9566-068-468.
Yes. ADT-02 must record findings with reasons; Section 66(6) expressly mandates a hearing opportunity before special audit material is used in proceedings; and any DRC-01 SCN must give 30 days for DRC-06 reply with personal hearing. Courts have consistently set aside audit-driven demands where the taxpayer was not given proper opportunity to be heard.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Chromepet — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
For Chromepet businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.
Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Chromepet, the business activity radiating outward from Madras Institute of Technology and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via Chromepet Suburban Railway and feeder routes connecting Chromepet to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Chromepet clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Chromepet, the cluster of it services, education, engineering businesses that defines Chromepet's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Chromepet: On the ground in Chromepet, for Chromepet IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSection 74 governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. The limitation is extended to five years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Penalty equal to the tax demanded is leviable. It is to be noted that the higher penalty regime under this provision requires the proper officer to specifically allege and establish one of the three jurisdictional triggers.
View sourceSub-section (5) of Section 65 obliges the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account or other documents as may be required, and to furnish such information as may be required and render assistance for timely completion of the audit. It is to be noted that non-cooperation under this sub-section can lead the proper officer to invoke best-judgment assessment under Section 62 or escalate to special audit under Section 66.
View sourceSection 73 governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed for reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Sub-section (1) requires the proper officer to issue a show-cause notice at least three months prior to the time-limit specified for issuance of order under sub-section (10). It is to be noted that post-audit adjudication frequently routes through Section 73 unless suppression is alleged.
View sourceRecords we prepare for Chromepet carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 12.9516, 80.1462, which map each submission back to this locality. Statutory correspondence for Chromepet businesses routes through the Tambaram Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Chromepet businesses tie back to the Tambaram Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. We keep a cycle-by-cycle record of how the Tambaram Division of the Chennai South handles Chromepet filings and approvals.
Commercial activity in Chromepet runs high, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Chromepet desk accordingly. Freight and foot traffic from the Chromepet Suburban Railway hub pull steady daily commerce through Chromepet, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this education it residential corridor pocket. Each GST Audit Support cycle for Chromepet reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Chromepet Railway Station, expenses routed through the Chromepet Suburban Railway freight network. The education it residential corridor mix of Chromepet shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of engineering activity and the commercial pulse around Chromepet Railway Station.
For a retail business in Chromepet, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. The retail firms we serve in Chromepet value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. The business mix in Chromepet centres on retail, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. The retail character of Chromepet commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs.
Document intake for Chromepet clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. The Chromepet GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. A Chromepet client sees the same GST Audit Support cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. Working papers for Chromepet GST Audit Support engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer.
From the same Chromepet team we also serve Tambaram and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Proximity to Tambaram means a Chromepet engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. GST Audit Support clients in Tambaram are handled by the same practitioners who run our Chromepet desk. Serving Chromepet and Tambaram from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster.
Patterns we track for Chromepet include education documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Tambaram Division tends to raise. Because we work repeatedly across Chromepet, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Chromepet are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Each engagement in Chromepet adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file.
For a new business incorporating in Chromepet or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. A startup setting up near MIT Industrial Estate in Chromepet gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Tambaram Division from day one. Shifting principal place of business to Chromepet means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. We onboard new Chromepet entities onto a GST Audit Support cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Chromepet businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Chromepet prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Chromepet businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
It can. Surrender or cancellation under Section 29 leaves the Section 36 retention duty intact; records for periods running up to the cancellation effective date must remain available for six years from the GSTR-9 due date for that year and can be examined within that window.
Form ADT-04 is the order conveying the special audit report to the registered person under Rule 102, marking the conclusion of the Section 66 process. Subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act 2017 if any short payment is established.
Yes, but Section 74 requires recorded satisfaction of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Where ADT-02 findings rest on tabular variance alone without these ingredients, the proceedings are vulnerable to downgrade to Section 73 on Kranti Associates speaking-order grounds.
Section 107(6) requires pre-deposit of ten per cent of the disputed tax leg only. The Madras High Court ratio in Tvl Sri Murugan Trading confines the obligation to disputed tax, leaving interest and penalty components outside the pre-deposit computation.
Yes. A written request citing genuine reasons such as auditor unavailability, partner illness or pendency of board records reconciliation is generally accommodated by the proper officer, provided the rescheduling does not breach the three-month completion window under Section 65(4).
Yes. The e-way bill register under Rule 138 is reconciled with outward supplies in GSTR-1 and inward consignment receipts. Audit teams flag Part-B late generation, validity-period breaches and consignor-consignee GSTIN mismatches as potential Section 129 exposures.
What Chromepet clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Chromepet, on the Tambaram-Pallavaram corridor that passes through Chromepet.
Reading this guide locally — In Chromepet, in the education-it residential corridor micro-market of Chromepet.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Where one or more ADT-02 findings are disputed, the registered person prepares for the SCN under Section 73 or Section 74. The SCN response should be filed within thirty days of receipt of DRC-01; extensions are available under Section 73(8) or 74(8). The response should address each allegation with: (i) the factual position; (ii) the legal position with cited provisions and circulars; (iii) cited case law (Goetze, Bharti Airtel, Suncraft Energy, Aap and Co, GKN Driveshafts, Kranti Associates, Pradeep Goyal, Tapas Dutta — only where load-bearing); (iv) the quantum-mitigation argument (Section 73 versus Section 74 framing, limitation, computational errors). The personal-hearing under Section 75(4) is the consolidation step. The DRC-07 order then issues; first appeal under Section 107 follows for adverse outcomes.
Where the ADT-02 findings, the SCN under Section 73/74, or the DRC-07 adjudication order suffers from jurisdictional infirmity — absence of Commissioner approval for Section 66 special audit, breach of Section 65(4) audit-completion timeline, denial of Section 75(4) opportunity of hearing, absence of Section 75(6) reasoned order, absence of DIN under Pradeep Goyal, breach of natural justice under audi alteram partem — the registered person can file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) line of authority offers guidance on writ entertainability in tax matters. The writ remedy is extraordinary and reserved for jurisdictional questions, not for merit-based challenges which belong in the statutory appellate hierarchy.
Section 84 of the CGST Act provides for the continuance and validation of certain recovery proceedings; it does not provide a formal settlement scheme akin to the income-tax Settlement Commission framework which existed pre Finance Act 2021. However, the GST Council has periodically recommended amnesty schemes for specific compliance categories — Notification 03/2023-CT and the surrounding family of notifications on late-fee waiver, the GSTR-9 late-fee amnesty, the registration-revocation amnesty under Notification 03/2023-CT, and the periodic Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme equivalent for legacy excise / service tax cases. The registered person facing an adverse audit closure should monitor GST Council recommendations (47th Chandigarh, 50th, 53rd and subsequent meetings) for amnesty windows that may offer settlement at reduced penalty quantum. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration recognises amnesty-and-voluntary-disclosure programmes as compliance-architecture tools.
Section 65(1) of the CGST Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, at such frequency and in such manner as may be prescribed. Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules read with Section 65(3) requires that the registered person be given not less than fifteen working days prior notice of audit through Form GST ADT-01. The ADT-01 intimation specifies the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year, occasionally a longer span) and the documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, declarations, returns, GSTR-9C reconciliation statement, internal-audit reports if any. The fifteen-day window is the registered person's opportunity to gather records and seek extension on documented grounds; Rule 101(3) implicitly contemplates such extensions where genuinely warranted.
Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.
Section 65(4) requires that the audit under Section 65 shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of audit. The Commissioner is empowered to extend this period by a further six months for reasons recorded in writing; the maximum total audit-cycle is therefore nine months from commencement. 'Commencement of audit' is defined in the Explanation to Section 65(4) as the date on which records and documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. This definition is significant for the registered person — timely document submission tightens the audit timeline and prevents prolonged uncertainty; the OECD Forum on Tax Administration best-practice benchmarks similarly emphasise audit-cycle time as a taxpayer-rights consideration.
The income-tax framework has a parallel under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 — special audit can be directed where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the nature and complexity of the accounts, the volume of accounts, doubts about the correctness of the accounts, multiplicity of transactions in the accounts or specialised nature of business activity, is of the opinion that it is necessary in the interests of revenue. Pre-GST excise had Section 14A; service tax had Section 72A. The architectural unity across these provisions is that special audit is a complexity-triggered intervention requiring a substantive opinion plus a procedural safeguard. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents a similar 'specialist audit' tier in several mature tax jurisdictions, reserved for complex high-revenue cases.
Section 66(1) of the CGST Act provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, any officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with the prior approval of the Commissioner, direct such registered person by communication in writing to get his records including books of account examined and audited by a Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant as may be nominated by the Commissioner. The trigger requires both a substantive opinion (value mis-declaration or abnormal credit) and a procedural pre-condition (Commissioner's prior approval); the registered person can challenge either limb in a Section 75 representation.
Once the Section 66(1) opinion is formed and Commissioner's approval obtained, Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit a report duly signed and certified, in such form as prescribed (Form ADT-04), within ninety days; this period can be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the CA/CMA, with the Commissioner's permission. Section 66(3) requires that the registered person be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on the basis of the special audit and proposed to be used in any proceeding against him. Section 66(4) clarifies that the expenses of the examination and audit, including remuneration of the CA/CMA, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner. Section 66(5) preserves the proper officer's power to take further proceedings (SCN under Section 73 / 74) on the basis of the special audit findings.
What Chromepet clients usually ask next: On the ground in Chromepet, for Chromepet IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Personal hearing under sub-section (4) of Section 75 is the opportunity granted by the proper officer or appellate authority to the registered person to present his case orally. Three adjournments at the option of the person sought to be heard are permitted on sufficient cause. Denial of personal hearing is a procedural infirmity.
Cross-examination is the right of the registered person, as part of the opportunity of being heard, to examine the witnesses or officers whose statements are relied on against him in adjudication. The right is sought through a written application during personal hearing. Denial is a recognised ground in first appeal under Section 107.
Reasons to believe is the jurisdictional threshold under sub-section (1) of Section 67 for inspection, search and seizure, and is invoked also in the special-audit context. The reasons must be recorded in writing and must rest on tangible material; subjective satisfaction without material is open to challenge.
Commissioner approval is the substantive condition for invoking special audit under sub-section (1) of Section 66. The proposing officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner must obtain prior approval of the Commissioner before issuing the direction in ADT-03. Approval without recorded reasons is open to challenge.
Officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner is the designation threshold under sub-section (1) of Section 66 for proposing the special audit. The rank requirement is a jurisdictional condition; a direction issued by a lower-ranked officer is vitiated for want of authority.
Records-availability test is the practical examination at the commencement of departmental audit of whether the registered person has produced books of account, invoices, contracts and reconciliations called for in ADT-01. The test sets the date of commencement of audit under the Explanation to Section 65(4) and the ninety-day clock runs from then.
Table 4 of GSTR-3B captures details of input tax credit. Sub-tables capture eligible ITC, ineligible ITC and reversals. Audit observations on Table 4 typically focus on mismatches between GSTR-2B-driven eligibility and credit availed in GSTR-3B, blocked credits under Section 17(5) and ITC on inward supplies under reverse charge.
Outward supply reconciliation is the comparison of turnover declared in GSTR-1, turnover declared in GSTR-3B, turnover declared in GSTR-9 and turnover as per audited financial statements. The reconciliation is the focal table of GSTR-9C and is a recurring audit observation area.
Sub-clause (aa) of sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the CGST Act conditions input tax credit on the details of the invoice or debit note being furnished by the supplier in GSTR-1 and communicated to the recipient. Departmental audit observations under this provision typically address ITC availed in respect of invoices not reflected in GSTR-2B.
Sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the CGST Act lists blocked credits — motor vehicles below thirteen-seater capacity, food and beverages, club membership, works contract for immovable property and others. Audit observations on Section 17(5) frequently require itemised reconciliation of ITC against the negative list.
Reverse charge audit is the subset of audit observations examining whether tax has been correctly paid by the recipient under sub-section (3) or (4) of Section 9 on notified supplies — goods transport agency, advocate services, sponsorship and others. The audit also tests whether ITC on RCM-paid tax has been availed only after payment of tax.
Composition audit is the audit of taxpayers paying tax under Section 10 of the CGST Act. The audit verifies turnover slabs, prohibited supplies (inter-State, e-commerce, ice-cream, pan masala, tobacco), maintenance of CMP filings and the rate of composition applied. CMP-08 quarterly statements and GSTR-4 annual return are the principal documents.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Chromepet businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Chromepet, the business activity radiating outward from Madras Institute of Technology and nearby commercial pockets; for Chromepet IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Chromepet, the business activity radiating outward from Madras Institute of Technology and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Chromepet engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Chromepet, the cluster of it services, education, engineering businesses that defines Chromepet's commercial fabric; for Chromepet IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Chromepet clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Across Chromepet we look after firms on Hanumar Koil Street, Hastthinapuram Main Road, NSR Road, Naidu Shop Road and Nehru street as well as the PTC Workshop Street, Periyar Street, Grand Southern Trunk Road and Pallavaram - Thoraipakkam Road corridors — local GST Audit Support without the cross-city travel.
Professional GST Audit Support in Chromepet, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.